意大利民粹主义领导人在Facebook和网络上分享的信息来源

Arturo Bertero
{"title":"意大利民粹主义领导人在Facebook和网络上分享的信息来源","authors":"Arturo Bertero","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media (Facebook, WhatsApp and YouTube) seem to be the key tool for accessing news in Italy. Coincidentally, they are also the key tool for communication and (internet-based) organisational aspects of two rather different populist parties (5SM and League) and their leaders, Di Maio (until January 2020) and Salvini. Salvini and Di Maio‘s FB pages shared contents that were not exactly analogous but still they present some similar characteristics. Among differences one can note that Salvini in contrast to Di Maio shared more frequently local content. Moreover, Salvini virtually ignored European sources. Network analysis showed that Salvini‘s FB page network was relatively far more extensive than Di Maio‘s. Interestingly, FB groups and pages sharing Di Maio’s posts were rather symbolic in numbers and mainly organized as bottom-up initiatives by small groups of militants that were not directly or formally linked to the 5SM. Conversely, those FB pages and groups more prone to share Salvini‘s contents tended to perceive themselves as local sections of the party. Both leaders tended to share content that supported their arguments, or at least content that they could use to support their own interpretation.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Bertero\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/sps.2021-2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media (Facebook, WhatsApp and YouTube) seem to be the key tool for accessing news in Italy. Coincidentally, they are also the key tool for communication and (internet-based) organisational aspects of two rather different populist parties (5SM and League) and their leaders, Di Maio (until January 2020) and Salvini. Salvini and Di Maio‘s FB pages shared contents that were not exactly analogous but still they present some similar characteristics. Among differences one can note that Salvini in contrast to Di Maio shared more frequently local content. Moreover, Salvini virtually ignored European sources. Network analysis showed that Salvini‘s FB page network was relatively far more extensive than Di Maio‘s. Interestingly, FB groups and pages sharing Di Maio’s posts were rather symbolic in numbers and mainly organized as bottom-up initiatives by small groups of militants that were not directly or formally linked to the 5SM. Conversely, those FB pages and groups more prone to share Salvini‘s contents tended to perceive themselves as local sections of the party. Both leaders tended to share content that supported their arguments, or at least content that they could use to support their own interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Politica Slovaca\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Politica Slovaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Politica Slovaca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

社交媒体(Facebook、WhatsApp和YouTube)似乎是意大利获取新闻的关键工具。巧合的是,它们也是两个截然不同的民粹主义政党(5SM和联盟)及其领导人迪马约(直到2020年1月)和萨尔维尼沟通和(基于互联网的)组织方面的关键工具。萨尔维尼和迪马约的FB页面分享的内容并不完全相似,但它们仍然呈现出一些相似的特征。在差异中可以注意到,与迪马约相比,萨尔维尼更频繁地分享当地内容。此外,萨尔维尼实际上忽视了欧洲的消息来源。网络分析显示,萨尔维尼的FB页面网络相对而言比迪马约的要广泛得多。有趣的是,分享迪马约帖子的FB群组和页面在数量上相当具有象征意义,主要是由与5SM没有直接或正式联系的少数武装分子组织的自下而上的倡议。相反,那些更倾向于分享萨尔维尼内容的FB页面和团体往往将自己视为该党的本地部分。两位领导人都倾向于分享支持他们论点的内容,或者至少分享他们可以用来支持自己解释的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders in Italy
Social media (Facebook, WhatsApp and YouTube) seem to be the key tool for accessing news in Italy. Coincidentally, they are also the key tool for communication and (internet-based) organisational aspects of two rather different populist parties (5SM and League) and their leaders, Di Maio (until January 2020) and Salvini. Salvini and Di Maio‘s FB pages shared contents that were not exactly analogous but still they present some similar characteristics. Among differences one can note that Salvini in contrast to Di Maio shared more frequently local content. Moreover, Salvini virtually ignored European sources. Network analysis showed that Salvini‘s FB page network was relatively far more extensive than Di Maio‘s. Interestingly, FB groups and pages sharing Di Maio’s posts were rather symbolic in numbers and mainly organized as bottom-up initiatives by small groups of militants that were not directly or formally linked to the 5SM. Conversely, those FB pages and groups more prone to share Salvini‘s contents tended to perceive themselves as local sections of the party. Both leaders tended to share content that supported their arguments, or at least content that they could use to support their own interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信