Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Cape and Natal special partnerships limited liability acts. A statutory history 开普和纳塔尔特别合伙有限责任法。法定历史
Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2015/V21N2A3
J. Henning
{"title":"The Cape and Natal special partnerships limited liability acts. A statutory history","authors":"J. Henning","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2015/V21N2A3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2015/V21N2A3","url":null,"abstract":"The origins of the Cape Special Partnerships Limited Liability Act of 1861 and the Natal Special Partnerships Limited Liability Act of 1864 have been open to question for quite some time in South Africa. The view that it was taken over directly from the United Kingdom cannot be supported. This contribution traces the origins of this legislation through the limited partnership legislation of New Zealand and Australia, back to the influential New York Limited Partnerships Act of 1822, and even further back to the very first limited partnership legislation in a common-law jurisdiction, namely the Irish Anonymous Partnerships Act of 1781, French Code de Commerce and Louis XIV's Ordinance Pour le Commerce of 1673. This supports a conclusion that in the latter Ordinance, limited partnership legislation and the partnership encommandite ultimately share a remote ancestor. In addition, attention is drawn briefly to the fortunes of the Natal and, especially, the Cape legislation in South Africa and four other jurisdictions in Southern Africa.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127718306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Van Dongen, EGD: Contributory negligence - A historical and comparative study Van Dongen, EGD:共同过失——历史与比较研究
Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8
P. Plessis
{"title":"Van Dongen, EGD: Contributory negligence - A historical and comparative study","authors":"P. Plessis","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8","url":null,"abstract":"This interesting study is concerned with one of those perennial problems of the civilian tradition, namely the rise of \"contributory negligence\" in cases of delict. Van Dongen traces the history of this notion from Roman to contemporary law. The book is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1 contains an introduction in which the main topic of study, the method adopted and the structure are all set out. Diachronic studies of an aspect of legal history are tricky and the method and scope sections are well worth reading. The author does a good job of limiting and justifying the choices made further on in the volume. It is particularly interesting to see the comments about Roman law and how one should not merely see it as the starting point in a long line of development.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129736060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The constitutional right to fair labour practices : a consideration of the influence and continued importance of the historical regulation of (un)fair labour practices pre-1977 公平劳动做法的宪法权利:对1977年以前(不)公平劳动做法的历史规定的影响和持续重要性的考虑
Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N2A1
M. Conradie
{"title":"The constitutional right to fair labour practices : a consideration of the influence and continued importance of the historical regulation of (un)fair labour practices pre-1977","authors":"M. Conradie","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N2A1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N2A1","url":null,"abstract":"It is safe to state that the right to work - to provide labour in return for remuneration - has its origin in a person's right to existence. A person's right to physical and emotional existence is probably the most fundamental of all human rights. In primitive times this right was subdivided into seven categories: the right to fish, to hunt, to work land, to harvest, to associate, to be free from troubles and the right to loot. But an increase in the population on earth and a consequent decrease in natural resources led to the exchange of the first four rights (fishing, hunting, cultivation and harvesting) for a right where independent existence was lost forever: labour.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"13 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124685198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信