Van Dongen, EGD:共同过失——历史与比较研究

P. Plessis
{"title":"Van Dongen, EGD:共同过失——历史与比较研究","authors":"P. Plessis","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This interesting study is concerned with one of those perennial problems of the civilian tradition, namely the rise of \"contributory negligence\" in cases of delict. Van Dongen traces the history of this notion from Roman to contemporary law. The book is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1 contains an introduction in which the main topic of study, the method adopted and the structure are all set out. Diachronic studies of an aspect of legal history are tricky and the method and scope sections are well worth reading. The author does a good job of limiting and justifying the choices made further on in the volume. It is particularly interesting to see the comments about Roman law and how one should not merely see it as the starting point in a long line of development.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Van Dongen, EGD: Contributory negligence - A historical and comparative study\",\"authors\":\"P. Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This interesting study is concerned with one of those perennial problems of the civilian tradition, namely the rise of \\\"contributory negligence\\\" in cases of delict. Van Dongen traces the history of this notion from Roman to contemporary law. The book is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1 contains an introduction in which the main topic of study, the method adopted and the structure are all set out. Diachronic studies of an aspect of legal history are tricky and the method and scope sections are well worth reading. The author does a good job of limiting and justifying the choices made further on in the volume. It is particularly interesting to see the comments about Roman law and how one should not merely see it as the starting point in a long line of development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项有趣的研究关注的是民事传统中一个长期存在的问题,即在犯罪案件中“共同过失”的增加。Van Dongen追溯了这一概念从罗马到当代法律的历史。这本书分为六章。第一章为绪论,阐述了本文的主要研究课题、研究方法和结构。法律史的一个方面的历时性研究是棘手的,方法和范围部分非常值得一读。作者很好地限制和证明了书中进一步做出的选择。特别有趣的是看到关于罗马法的评论以及人们如何不应该仅仅把它看作是漫长发展历程中的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Van Dongen, EGD: Contributory negligence - A historical and comparative study
This interesting study is concerned with one of those perennial problems of the civilian tradition, namely the rise of "contributory negligence" in cases of delict. Van Dongen traces the history of this notion from Roman to contemporary law. The book is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1 contains an introduction in which the main topic of study, the method adopted and the structure are all set out. Diachronic studies of an aspect of legal history are tricky and the method and scope sections are well worth reading. The author does a good job of limiting and justifying the choices made further on in the volume. It is particularly interesting to see the comments about Roman law and how one should not merely see it as the starting point in a long line of development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信