Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy最新文献_第7页

On Mexican Philosophy, For Example 以墨西哥哲学为例

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2019-01-25 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2019).100113

C. Pereda

引用次数: 2

Apophatic Community: Yannaras on Relational Being Apophatic社区:Yannaras论关系存在

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2019-01-25 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2019).100105

F. Dallmayr

引用次数: 0

Book Review on New Frontiers of Chinese Philosophy (edited & trans. by Nevad Kahteran) 中国哲学新前沿书评(编辑译)。内瓦德·卡特兰)

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090208

Jana S. Rošker

引用次数: 0

Two Paradigmatic Strategies for Reading Zhuang Zi's "Happy Fish" Vignette as Philosophy: Guo Xiang's and Wang Fuzhi's Approaches 庄子“喜鱼”小品哲学解读的两种范式策略——郭祥与王夫之的解读方法

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090207

John Williams

{"title":"Two Paradigmatic Strategies for Reading Zhuang Zi's \"Happy Fish\" Vignette as Philosophy: Guo Xiang's and Wang Fuzhi's Approaches","authors":"John Williams","doi":"10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090207","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most beloved passages in the Zhuang-Zi text is a dialogue between Hui Zi and Zhuang Zi at the end of the “Qiu-shui”chapter. While this is one of many vignettes involving Hui Zi and Zhuang Zi in the text, this particular vignette has recently drawn attention in Chinese and comparative philosophy circles. The most basic question concerning these studies is whether or not the passage represents a substantial philosophical dispute, or instead idle chitchat between two friends. This vignette has not only received much attention as of late, but commentators from at least Guo Xiang onward have taken the conversation as substantial rather than merely charming. Of the traditional readings that take the passage as substantial, there are two main strategies for taking Zhuang Zi as “winning” a substantial dispute: (1) One that argues Zhuang Zi is undermining Hui Zi’s position without offering a positive position, and (2) another that argues that Zhuang Zi is undermining Hui Zi’s position by offering a positive position. Guo Xiang’s “official commentary” is paradigmatic of the first “negative” strategy, while Wang Fuzhi’s reading is paradigmatic of the second “positive” strategy. The goal in the present article is to present these two strategies for reading the passage by translating and analyzing Guo’s and Wang’s annotations, thereby showing how the passage might be and has been taken as more than frivolous chitchat.","PeriodicalId":338148,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131820671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Early Pyrrhonism as a Sect of Buddhism? A Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy 早期皮龙主义作为佛教的一个教派?比较哲学方法论的个案研究

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090204

M. Johnson, B. Shults

{"title":"Early Pyrrhonism as a Sect of Buddhism? A Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy","authors":"M. Johnson, B. Shults","doi":"10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090204","url":null,"abstract":"We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy.","PeriodicalId":338148,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122066656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The [Not So] Hidden Curriculum of the Legalist State in the Book of Lord Shang and the Han-Fei-Zi 《尚书》与《汉非子》中法家国家的隐性课程

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090206

Brandon King

引用次数: 4

Dialetheism, Paradox, and Nāgārjuna’s Way of Thinking 辩证论、悖论与Nāgārjuna的思维方式

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090205

R. Jones

引用次数: 3

EDITOR's Words 编者的话

Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy Pub Date : 2010-07-08 DOI: 10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010204

Bo Mou

{"title":"EDITOR's Words","authors":"Bo Mou","doi":"10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010204","url":null,"abstract":"The current issue (volume 8, no.1, January 2017) consists of two parts: besides its regular “Articles” part containing four peer-reviewed articles, it also includes a “Constructive-Engagement Dialogue” section marking the tenth anniversary of the constructive-engagement project “Searle’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy” (the conference held at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2005, and the anthology volume published by Brill in 2008): it includes five authors’ furtherengagement articles, in response to Searle’s “reply” comments on their contributing essays in the volume. Let me say something more about this section. Around ten years ago, this project is actually a sister project with the nearly concurrent “constructive-engagement” project “Davidson’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy”; the latter project had been planned to take the similar engaging format with Davidson’s prospective replies to the contributions as well as his oral engaging dialogue on the scene of its Beijing conference. However, the SARS outbreak in Beijing in spring 2003 forced us to postpone the 2003 summer conference event to the next year; Davidson thus changed his 2003 summer schedule to carry out his knee-replacement operation; his passing away due to the operation was unfortunate and prevented the direct “constructive engagement” opportunity like the one we have with Searle. So we especially value various aspects of this constructive-engagement opportunity with Searle: Searle not only effectively responded to all the speakers’ engaging presentations in the two-day conference in Hong Kong (we can still vividly remember how John was exhausted after giving two days’ worth of replies to all the speakers), but also has given his very valuable and thought-stimulating “reply” writings to all the contributors of the volume. In this way, all the volume contributors and the conference participants have deeply treasured and appreciated the engaging opportunity with him. These contributions to this section collectively show such appreciation through further philosophical engagement. To my knowledge, Searle has loved this project’s emphasis on the critical engagement of his thought rather than mere celebration. I remember that, in 2004 when I first talked with him about this “engagement” idea explaining to him that we then didn’t have secured funding to cover his travel expenses for participating in the Hong Kong conference, although we endeavored to have it; so I asked him whether he still would like to go using his own resources; Searle’s answer is a firm “yes” because he likes the challenge and engagement, especially since these challenge and engagement resort to relevant rich resources from both Western and Chinese philosophical traditions.","PeriodicalId":338148,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131586313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3