IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)最新文献_第3页

Methods of Intellectual Property Valuation 知识产权价值评估方法

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2008-10-21 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.909734

Susan J. Chaplinsky, G. Payne

引用次数: 19

Are Patents Discouraging Innovation? 专利阻碍创新吗?

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2007-09-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1014531

Soma Dey

引用次数: 2

Patents Pending: Patent Reform for the Innovation Economy 专利未决:创新经济的专利改革

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2007-05-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1004512

Julie A. Hedlund

引用次数: 6

Valuing Patents for Licensing: A Practical Survey of the Literature 评估专利许可:文献的实践调查

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2006-03-03 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1440292

A. Layne-Farrar, J. Lerner

{"title":"Valuing Patents for Licensing: A Practical Survey of the Literature","authors":"A. Layne-Farrar, J. Lerner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1440292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1440292","url":null,"abstract":"A number of methods exist for valuing a patent in order to license it to an external party. Several of these methods are well accepted in academic circles, others are merely tolerated as expedient. None of the existing methods, however, appears poised to easily accommodate software patent valuation in the face of open source software. Open source software distributors do not earn revenues directly from licensing source code. Even forprofit open source enterprises, such as Red Hat, provide software as part of a service bundle, not as an individually priced product. The problem of linking a patent to a stream of revenue generated by a bundle of goods holds for many service-oriented businesses, with open source as an extreme case. The increasing prevalence of service-based business models suggests that new thinking about how to put a price on patented innovations may be required. In addition to the basic problem of placing a dollar value on an innovation, new thinking on the incentives at play in license negotiations may also be necessary. In other words, do any unique principal-agent problems between patent holder and licensee surface as a result of the open source business model‘ Do any other licensing structure issues need to be worked through in order for existing theory to fit an open source environment. Before any of this 'new thinking' can begin (or is even warranted), though, an assessment of the current state of art is in order. This paper reviews the academic literature on valuing patent licenses.","PeriodicalId":337989,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132293456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

The Value of Certainty in Intellectual Property Rights: Stock Market Reactions to Patent Litigation. 知识产权确定性的价值:股票市场对专利诉讼的反应。

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2005-11-15 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.945009

Alan C. Marco

引用次数: 12

Are All Patent Examiners Equal? The Impact of Examiner Characteristics 所有专利审查员都是平等的吗?考官特征的影响

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2002-06-01 DOI: 10.3386/W8980

I. Cockburn, Samuel Kortum, Scott Stern

{"title":"Are All Patent Examiners Equal? The Impact of Examiner Characteristics","authors":"I. Cockburn, Samuel Kortum, Scott Stern","doi":"10.3386/W8980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W8980","url":null,"abstract":"Building on insights gained from interviewing administrators and patent examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we collect and analyze a novel dataset on patent examiners and patent outcomes. This dataset is based on 182 patents for which the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled on validity between 1997 and 2000. For each patent, we identify a USPTO primary examiner, and collect historical statistics derived from their entire patent examination history. These data are used to explore a number of hypotheses about the connection between the patent examination process and the strength of ensuing patent rights. Our main findings are as follows. (i) Patent examiners and the patent examination process are not homogeneous. There is substantial variation in observable characteristics of patent examiners, such as their tenure at the USPTO, the number of patents they have examined and the degree to which the patents that they examine are later cited by other patents. (ii) There is no evidence that examiner experience or workload at the time a patent is issued affects the probability that the CAFC finds a patent invalid. (iii) Examiners whose patents tend to be more frequently cited tend to have a higher probability of a CAFC invalidity ruling. The results suggest that all patent examiners are not equal, and that one of the roles of the CAFC is to review the exercise of discretion in the patent examination process.","PeriodicalId":337989,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130782599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 128

International Patenting and Technology Diffusion 国际专利和技术扩散

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 1994-11-01 DOI: 10.3386/W4931

J. Eaton, Samuel Kortum

{"title":"International Patenting and Technology Diffusion","authors":"J. Eaton, Samuel Kortum","doi":"10.3386/W4931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W4931","url":null,"abstract":"We model the invention of new technologies and their diffusion across countries. Our model predicts that, eventually, all countries will grow at the same rate, with each country's productivity ranking determined by how rapidly it adopts inventions. The common growth rate depends on research efforts in all countries, while research effort is determined by how much inventions earn at home and abroad. Patents affect the return to invention. We relate the decision to patent an invention internationally to the cost of patenting in a country and to the expected value of patent protection in that country. We can thus infer the direction and magnitude of the international diffusion of technology from data on international patenting, productivity, and research. We fit the model to data from the five leading research economies. The parameters indicate how much technology flows between these countries and how much each country earns from its inventions domestically and elsewhere. Our results imply that foreign countries are important sources of technology even though countries earn most of their return to innovation at home. For example, about half of U.S. productivity growth derives from foreign technology yet U.S. investors earn 98 per cent of the revenue from their inventions domestically.","PeriodicalId":337989,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123321024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 104

Economic Consequences of a Changing Litigation Environment: The Case of Patents 诉讼环境变化的经济后果:专利案例

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 1994-08-01 DOI: 10.3386/W4835

J. Lanjouw

引用次数: 28

Inequitable Conduct and Walker Process Claims After Therasense and the America Invents Act Therasense和《美国发明法》之后的不公平行为和沃克程序索赔

IRPN: Innovation & Patent Law & Policy (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3623312

Gideon Mark, T. L. Anenson

引用次数: 1