Command and Control Research Program最新文献_第2页

Intelligent Nodes in Knowledge Centric Warfare 知识中心战中的智能节点

Command and Control Research Program Pub Date : 2002-06-01 DOI: 10.21236/ada461953

E. Dawidowicz, Albert Rodríguez, J. Langston

引用次数: 3

Training Program Review: Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS) Training Program Evaluation 训练计划审查:战区战斗管理核心系统(TBMCS)训练计划评估

Command and Control Research Program Pub Date : 2002-05-01 DOI: 10.21236/ada402336

Marcie E. Zaharee

引用次数: 2

Complexity, Networking, & Effects-Based Approaches to Operations 复杂性、网络化和基于效果的操作方法

Command and Control Research Program Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21236/ada457293

Edward A. Smith

{"title":"Complexity, Networking, & Effects-Based Approaches to Operations","authors":"Edward A. Smith","doi":"10.21236/ada457293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ada457293","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Our world is a myriad of ever-changing, interdependent variables whose courses we can never entirely predict. The strength of an effects-based approach to operations is that it squarely addresses these complexities by concentrating on their most nonlinear aspects: humans, their institutions, and their actions. Indeed, the entire effects-based approach can be characterized by four things: a focus on the human dimension of competition and conflict; the consideration of a full spectrum of actions whether in peace, crisis, or hostilities; a multifaceted, whole-of-nation concept of power; and the recognition of the complex interconnected nature of the actors and challenges involved. The human dimension arises because all effects-based approaches are ultimately about shaping human perceptions and behavior, and because they depend heavily on human beings to make the complex estimates and decisions involved. The focus on an entire spectrum of actions means thinking holistically across a peace-crisis-hostilities spectrum. Finally, any effects-based approach must proceed from the recognition that all actions and the reactions they provoke are inextricably linked in a system of ever-changing and adapting human systems whose complexity shapes both the nature of the problem and the task of assessing, planning, and executing any operation. The central tenet of an effects-based approach to operations is that we can somehow purposefully shape the interactions of the actors in this complex security environment. Living systems theory offers a way of approaching this complexity. It sees the world in biological and sociological terms as an interlocking multilevel system of complex adaptive systems from which no individual system can be extracted without changing both its character and that of the system as a whole. In the model, interactions occur simultaneously on many different levels with each interaction tending to proceed at a pace dictated by local circumstances.","PeriodicalId":333539,"journal":{"name":"Command and Control Research Program","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131220253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 68

Dynamic Strike Force Asset Reallocation for Time Critical Targeting 针对时间关键目标的动态打击力量资产再分配

Command and Control Research Program Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21236/ada457981

J. McDonnell, N. Gizzi

引用次数: 4

A 'Trust But Verify' Design for Course of Action Displays “信任但需验证”的操作过程显示设计

Command and Control Research Program Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21236/ada461061

M. John, D. Manes, G. Osga

{"title":"A 'Trust But Verify' Design for Course of Action Displays","authors":"M. John, D. Manes, G. Osga","doi":"10.21236/ada461061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ada461061","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Automation, particularly of complex cognitive tasks, is bound to be incomplete, simplistic, or otherwise less than completely reliable. Recently, we have begun developing Trust but Verify techniques for increasing the effectiveness of even unreliable automation. The user's trust should be conditioned on known situational factors that affect the reliability of the automation, and users should be able to verify the automation results and operation to various qualitative degrees as the level of trust dictates. Here, we describe our preliminary work on these concepts in the domain of Course of Action (COA) selection for an Intruder Interception Task. This task involves deciding which of several available aircraft should be chosen to perform an interception of an unknown aircraft intruding into the air space. Based on repeated interviews with four subject matter experts, we identified and then distilled a set of factors essential to evaluating the optimal COA. We then designed a set of alternative displays to illustrate the factors based on the Trust but Verify concept and general human factors display guidance. Here we analyze the benefits and costs of two major design decisions: whether to display the COA factors using a tabular or graphic organization, and whether or how to integrate the COAs with the map or with each other in a common table.","PeriodicalId":333539,"journal":{"name":"Command and Control Research Program","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131222537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4