{"title":"Law of informational cosmic spacetime: E = i mc2","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.09","url":null,"abstract":"Combining mass and energy with information in the inseparable quantum equivalence of E=i mc2 has opened a new informational medicine to help patients maintain truth, good health and beauty (Klimek R., Threefold Material-InformationalEnergetic Reality:E=i mc2 ,Biocosmology–neo-Aristotelism, Vol. 4(4), 2014: 408-409; Klimek R., Information equation E =i mc2 of Cosmic Beings - 20 Questions to Professor Rudolf Klimek: The President, World Information University; In the Style of Socratic Dialogue, Biocosmology–neo-Aristotelism, Vol.9(3&4),2019:218-229).","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136377608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quantum Elliptic Curve","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.08","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper summarizes the author’s work on Elliptic Curve and its Rational Points. We derive new Quantum Mechanical Equation from the Quantum Mechanics first principles. We then describe the Quantum Entanglement Mechanism, based on the link between the two Quantum Elliptic Curves author first derived in the original version of the present paper in October 2020. The two Quantum Elliptic Curves represent states of the two entangled particles forming an EPR-pair (aka Bell state). Also we present two methods of manipulation of state of an EPR-pair. Together they provide algorithm for the Quantum Teleportation.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134971164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Necessity for Fair Evaluation of Objective Criticism of Physical Theories","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.06","url":null,"abstract":"There are many ways to prove that Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (SR) is not valid. For example, the mixing of space and time coordinates predicted by the Lorentz Transformation (LT) is not consistent with the Law of Causality. Moreover, the combination of the FitzGerald-Lorentz length contraction of objects in motion and the corresponding time dilation of moving clocks derived from the LT is not compatible with Einstein’s equal light-speed postulate of SR. The way in which different journals have reacted when presented with manuscripts that deal with these problems with SR is the subject of the present discussion. Some journals simply have promptly forwarded such manuscripts to referees and thereupon published them, but one of them has rejected the same papers without the benefit of outside advice. The possible reason for this distinctive behavior is analyzed and attributed to the reluctance of some mainstream journals to admit that their previously unqualified support for Einstein’s theory is not justified by the facts.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134972337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Proton, Gravity, and Black Hole Equations","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.07","url":null,"abstract":"In these papers, I presented and explained the Potential Energy Equation \"P.E.E.\"; this equation is about discovering how gravitation works, the cosmological facts for the Black Hole physics \"B.H.\", and the \"B.H.\" primary role in the gravitational energy at both the astronomical (planets: Earth, Sun, etc.) and microscopic atomic (Protons) levels. \"P.E.E.\" equation is uncovering a new concept for the Planck Constant and the Fine Structure, as an inhibition for the \"B.H.\" energy and as a convertor from one type of energy to another in the \"P.E.E.\" energies parts; this new concept is also explaining the \"Attractive Mass\" or \"central mass\" and redefining the Gravitational Potential Energy Ug ; and the Kinetic Energy as well; and it is clarifying the difference in apply between Ug and the Weak Potential Energy of mass (Attracted Mass) \"Ag \". I already defined the \"B.H.\" potential energy ( fs ) equation, the mass compressed \"Np \" with radius\"rs \" of the “B.H” equation, the mass compressing distance \"rc \" and the radius \"rs \" of the “B.H.” equation; and the gravitational and \"B.H.\" energy equations; I have also applied these equations on astronomical and microscopic dimensions.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134972185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Unified Quantum Picture of the World","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.05","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a model of Unitary Quantum Field theory where the particle is represented as a wave packet. The frequency dispersion equation is chosen so that the packet periodically appears and disappears without form changings. The envelope of the process is identified with a conventional wave function. Equation of such a field is nonlinear and relativistically invariant. With proper adjustments, they are reduced to Dirac, Schrödinger and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. A number of new experimental effects have been predicted both for high and low energies. Fine structure constant (1/137) was determined in 1988, masses of numerous elementary particles starting from electron were evaluated in 2007 with accuracy less than 1 % . 2 pentaquarks, θ^+barion, Higgs boson and particle 28 GeV were discovered 11 years later, all of them were evaluated with high accuracy before. The overall picture of the world is based on a unify field. These Equations allow for the beginning of a universe without a Big Bang. Gravity ceases to be a mystery. In principle, a completely new type of \"green\" energy is possible for mankind.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135786966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The universe generated by the explosion of the primordial cosmic vacuum!","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.04","url":null,"abstract":"Over all its epochs mankind always has put the fundamental question: When and why at all did the universe start its existence? Most cosmologists univocally do answer this question with the standard dogmatic answer: By the Big-Bang! - namely by the initial explosion of an extremely concentrated world matter system! This standard paradigm of a general and global explosion creating this world obviously appears to be highly suggestive, though such an explosive event unexpectedly turns out to be extremely hard to understand on purely physical grounds. This is because it is extremely hard to explain which pressures might be responsible to drive the initially highly compacted cosmic matter apart. The somewhat naive idea that the required explosion forces in view of the extremely high temperatures and the extreme highly compacted primordial cosmic matter, are due to extreme initial pressure forces does not solve the problem, because relativistically hot matter will be just an additional source of gravity, hence just contrary to the expectations impedes matter to fly apart. It can, however, be shown that the expected explosive BB- event can only physically occur, if the required pressure is not established by the temperature of gravitating matter, but by the cosmic vacuum. In fact we show that without this cosmic vacuuum pressure, the so-called Big-Bang never could have happened, even though vacuum pressure up to the present days of cosmology, still may be a rather speculative subject. In the following article we shall demonstrate that with a revised understanding of this highly speculative quantity one can explain the present universe as an explosion of the primordial cosmic vacuum followed by a succesive materialisation of this vacuum into cosmic matter at the ongoing cosmic expansion.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136241457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Weak Interaction and Radioactivity","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.03","url":null,"abstract":"The property of radioactivity was discovered in 1896 by the French physicist A. Becquerel. Further research showed that during the radioactive decay of elements, α-, β- and γ-rays are emitted. α-rays are helium nuclei, β-rays are electrons, γ-rays are electromagnetic waves.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136162102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stochastic Quantum Probability and Subatomic Particle Experiment Design","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.03.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.03.01","url":null,"abstract":"This article is the third of a trilogy of articles on the nature of probability in quantum mechanics. The first article [1] began by noting that superposed wavefunctions in quantum mechanics lead to a squared amplitude that introduces interference into the position probability density of an atomic particle, which happens nowhere else in probability theory. It went on to also note that there is an unexplained coincidence in quantum mechanics in that the interference term in the squared amplitude of superposed wavefunctions gives the squared amplitude the form of a variance of a sum of correlated random variables and went on to examine whether there could be an archetypical variable, in the Platonic sense of true form, behind quantum probability that would reconcile quantum probability with classic probability. This examination found such a variable, which can encompass both local and nonlocal quantum events. The second article [2] provided evidence that quantum probability has such a stochastic nature. This evidence was based on the number of electrons that need to be sent through a two-slit interferometer to gain a clear pattern of self-interference, which when compared with the number that would be expected to be sufficient in order for the position probability distribution of the self-interference wavefunction to take clear shape suggests that there is more variability present than that described by the formulation of quantum mechanics, which implies the presence of an underlying and as yet unrecognized physical process. This final article completes the trilogy by considering how a key aspect of experimental design would be affected by the increased variability that would be present if quantum probability is itself stochastic in the manner suggested in the previous two articles.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135756586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Urgent Call for Astronomer's Validation of “G-D’s Physics” Unique UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction!","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.02.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.02.07","url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics has undergone a major “Paradigmatic-Shift” from the Old “Material-Causal” Paradigm underlying General Relativity Theory (GRT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) to the New “G-D’s Physics” (“Computational Unified Field Theory”, CUFT) [1-47]. This “ParadigmaticShift” inevitably followed the appearance of a fundamental “Paradigmatic-Crisis” of the Old “Material-Causal” Paradigm signified by a basic “theoretical-inconsistency” between its (abovementioned) constituting Models (e.g., GRT & QM), as well as its principle inability to explain the accelerated rate of the universe’s expansion, e.g., assumed to be “caused” by purely hypothetical “dark-matter” and “dark-energy” concepts, but could not be detected experimentally (despite over twenty years of intensive experimental efforts to do so)?! Instead, the New “G-D’s Physics” (CUFT) has been shown capable of resolving this (apparent) “theoretical-inconsistency” between GRT & QM based on its discovery of a singular (higher-ordered) UCP which simultaneously computes the four basic physical features (e.g., of “space”, “energy”, ”mass” and “time”) of every exhaustive spatial pixel in the universe – in the incredible rate of “c2 /h” = 1.36-50 sec’(!) thereby producing an extremely rapid series of UF’s frames comprising the entire physical universe at every “minimal time-point”!","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136365876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Never there would have been a cosmic big-bang without the action of a vacuum pressure!","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/atcp.06.02.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/atcp.06.02.05","url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental and always resurrecting question of mankind, how this universe could ever have started its existence, is answered by most cosmologists with the standard dogmatic answer: By the Big-Bang! - that initial explosion of the world matter system! Perhaps this standard paradigm of a general and global explosion creating the world, especially in these days of wars and weapons all around, seems to be highly suggestive. Nevertheless such an event unexpectedly turns out to be extremely hard to explain as based on purely physical grounds. It indeed seems easy to imagine a granate explosion causing matter to fly apart in all directions, but it is extremely hard to explain which pressures might be responsible to drive the initially highly compacted cosmic matter apart of eachother. If the explosion forces are imagined as due to pressure forces then these pressures cannot be due to extremely high temperatures of matter, because relativistically hot matter will be just an additional source of gravity, hence just impeding matter to fly apart. As we shall show in the following article the explosive BB- event can only physically be explained, if the necessary pressure is not manifested by the gravitating matter, but by the cosmic vacuum. In fact without the cosmic vacuuum pressure, the so-called Big-Bang never could have happened. Vacuum pressure, however, up to the present days of cosmology, still is a fully speculative subject, but it will become evident in the following article, that without this highly speculative quantity there could not have happened a Big-Bang at all.","PeriodicalId":329309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics","volume":"436 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135672648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}