Comparative Legilinguistics最新文献_第7页

Motivation and Electronic Media in LSP Translation Teaching LSP翻译教学中的动机与电子媒体

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.40.4

Ljubica Kordić

{"title":"Motivation and Electronic Media in LSP Translation Teaching","authors":"Ljubica Kordić","doi":"10.14746/cl.2019.40.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2019.40.4","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Expansion of IT-media in every field of human activity is one of the essential characteristics of modern time. This paper aims at presenting the role of electronic media in teaching translation in the field of law at the University of Osijek, Croatia, and analysing their impact on the motivation of the target group of students in the teaching process. The paper endeavours to provide some insight into the modern teaching practice and to analyse the interconnectedness of the use of electronic media and student motivation rather than to present some empirical research in the field. In the first part of the paper, a theoretical approach to teaching legal translation today is offered. In the main part, teaching legal translation by using modern media is presented on the examples of the Lifelong Learning Programme for Lawyer-Linguists at the Faculty of Law Osijek, and the course on legal translation within the German Language and Literature Studies at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of Osijek. The usage of electronic media in translation teaching is discussed with reference to the courses Introduction to the Theory of Legal Translation and Online Translation Tools and EU Vocabulary. Specific types of online materials, translation tools and sources are discussed from the point of view of student motivation. New media are also discussed from the perspective of their efficiency at different stages of translation teaching. In the concluding part, application of modern technologies in teaching legal translation is compared with other teaching methods, approaches and techniques. Finally, the author questions using IT as motivation tools in the higher education teaching discourse and argues for application of “moderate approach” in the teaching of legal translation.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":"40 1","pages":"67 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49269829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

LEX.CH.IT: A Corpus for Micro-Diachronic Linguistic Investigations of Swiss Normative Acts in Italian 瑞士语规范行为的微历时语料库研究

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.40.3

Paolo Canavese

引用次数: 1

REFERENCYJNA TRANSPARENTNOŚĆ MOTYWOWANYCH NAZW ORGANÓW PAŃSTWOWYCH W PRZEKŁADACH 国家机关名称在翻译中的参考透明度

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-11-28 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.38.2

Łukasz Iluk

引用次数: 0

Working by the Light of the Moon: The Translation of ‘Moonlighting’ in Multilingual Official Documents. A Review. 月光下的工作:多语种官方文件中“兼职”的翻译。复习一下。

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.39.1

Pietro Manzella

引用次数: 1

Badania Polonistyczne w Zakresie Legilingwistyki 波兰法律学研究

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.39.4

A. Kubacki

引用次数: 1

Judicial Complex Strategies in Hungarian Courtroom Interrogation 匈牙利法庭审讯中的司法综合体策略

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.39.3

Marianna Varga

引用次数: 2

The BoLC for Legal Translations: A Trial Lesson 法律翻译的BoLC:一个试训

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2019.39.2

Patrizia Giampieri

引用次数: 1

Legal-Linguistic Profiling in Institutional Contexts: The Case of EU Staff Representation Bodies 制度背景下的法律语言分析:欧盟工作人员代表机构的案例

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2020.41.2

Colin D. Robertson

引用次数: 0

The Transposition of International Criminal Law Concepts Into National Jurisdictions: The Case of Genocide 国际刑法概念在国家管辖范围内的转换:种族灭绝案

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-08-21 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2020.41.4

Marie Girard

引用次数: 0

Epistemic Modality: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Epistemic Markers in EU and Polish Judgments 认知情态:基于语料库的欧盟和波兰判决的认知标记分析

Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-08-21 DOI: 10.14746/cl.2020.41.3

Dariusz Koźbiał

{"title":"Epistemic Modality: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Epistemic Markers in EU and Polish Judgments","authors":"Dariusz Koźbiał","doi":"10.14746/cl.2020.41.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2020.41.3","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this paper is to establish the repertoire and distribution of verbal and adverbial exponents of epistemic modality in English- and Polish-language judgments passed by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and non-translated judgments passed by the Supreme Court of Poland (SN). The study applies a model for categorizing exponents of epistemicity with regard to their (i) level (high-, medium- and low-level of certainty, necessity or possibility expressed by the markers; primary dimension), (ii) perspective (own vs. reported perspective), (iii) opinion (based either on facts or beliefs) and (iv) time (the embedding of epistemic markers in sentences relating to the past, present or future) (contextual dimensions). It examines the degree of intra-generic convergence of translated EU judgments and non-translated national judgments in terms of the employment of epistemic markers, as well as the degree of authoritativeness of judicial argumentation, and determines whether the frequent use of epistemic markers constitutes a generic feature of judgments. The research material consists of a parallel corpus of English- and Polish-language versions of 200 EU judgments and a corpus of 200 non-translated domestic judgments. The results point to the high salience and differing patterns of use of epistemic markers in both EU and national judgments. The frequent use of high-level epistemic markers boosts the authoritativeness of judicial reasoning.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":"41 1","pages":"39 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48177053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5