{"title":"Navigating cultural and pedagogical challenges: An autoethnographic study of a Vietnamese EFL lecturer-researcher’s experiences in the Mekong Delta","authors":"Le Thanh Thao, Pham Trut Thuy","doi":"10.1177/20597991241264836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241264836","url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study presents an autoethnographic exploration of the challenges faced by a Vietnamese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) lecturer-researcher in conducting autoethnographic research. Situated in the complex socio-cultural landscape of Vietnam, particularly within the Mekong Delta region, this study provides an in-depth analysis of the unique interplay between personal experiences and broader educational and cultural contexts. The research employs reflective writings and self-recording videos as primary data sources, offering a rich narrative of the lecturer-researcher’s professional and personal journey. The findings reveal a multifaceted array of challenges. These include navigating cultural and personal biases in teaching practices, balancing traditional and student-centered pedagogies, and grappling with the role of English as both a global language and a potential agent of cultural dominance. The study also uncovers the emotional labor inherent in autoethnographic research and the complexities of maintaining professional identity in a postcolonial educational setting. Through its focus on a Vietnamese EFL context, the study contributes significantly to the discourse on critical pedagogy and postcolonial theory. It highlights the need for heightened cultural sensitivity and reflexivity in educational research and practice, advocating for pedagogical approaches that are both effective and culturally responsive. The findings and implications of this study are particularly relevant for educators, researchers, and policymakers in similar postcolonial and multicultural educational contexts.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"57 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141799218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Methodological confluence: Weaving Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) and Indigenous research methods","authors":"Tebogo B. Sebeelo","doi":"10.1177/20597991241256794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241256794","url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research methods have treated Western knowledge systems and Indigenous studies as polar opposites with asymmetrical power relations. Studies have documented the hegemonic dominance of Western science over Indigenous knowledge systems. Despite this tension, there is an opportunity to integrate Western science with Indigenous knowledges to bridge these discordant systems. This paper argues that Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT), a Western-based version of grounded theory can be weaved with Indigenous research. CGT’s emphasis on co-construction, relationality, value-free inquiry, and social justice align with Indigenous research principles. Using examples from both CGT and Indigenous scholarship, the paper argues that CGT with its pragmatist and constructivist orientation can exist alongside an Indigenous research agenda. Furthermore, the flexible, emergent, and relativist nature of CGT aligns with some aspects of Indigenous research. The paper demonstrates that both knowledge systems can be treated on an equal par, engender methodological reciprocity and provide mutual benefits to each other. Weaving CGT and Indigenous research might provide new avenues of thinking about doing research with Indigenous communities and other marginalized communities.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141365675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Systems dynamics and casual configurations: Using dynamic pattern synthesis for macroeconomic comparative research","authors":"David Alemna, Philip Haynes","doi":"10.1177/20597991241256791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241256791","url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic Pattern Synthesis (DPS) provides a new longitudinal method for evaluating the impacts of macroeconomic and public policy interventions. Situated within complexity theory and critical realism, it has evolved from the established methods of Cluster Analysis and Configurational Modelling approaches. Dynamic Pattern Synthesis identifies case convergence and divergence (using quantitative techniques), while remaining close to the qualitative uniqueness of each case. In this paper, the DPS approach is used to consider macroeconomic convergence across Sub-Saharan Africa during the Millennium Development Goals, and the possible impacts of IMF interventions in stimulating long-term macroeconomic outcomes. The findings reveal a high degree of economic instability experienced across the region and varying responses to an external shock. The importance of ‘outliers’ and inconsistency in country convergence are also observed. The DPS method highlights the importance of individual country experiences in relation to external shocks. When factoring in IMF interventions, the findings highlight multiple paths to a given policy outcome, rather than a single optimal economic strategy. This opens up the debate on policy issues associated with economic complexity, including how best to create an overall environment of stability that might promote convergence and reduce the instability that undermines planning and investment.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141363438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A novel experimental vignette methodology: SMART vignettes","authors":"Jane Paik Kim, Hyun-Joon Yang","doi":"10.1177/20597991241240081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241240081","url":null,"abstract":"We motivate and present the methodology of vignette studies. The primary contribution of this paper is our proposal of a novel vignette study design: “SMART vignettes.” Our design has two notable features: the first is its use of sequential randomization, which conceptually originates from the sequential multiple assignment randomization trial (SMART) design developed by Murphy (2004). The second feature is adaptive allocation. These new features in vignette studies offer unique advantages not offered by traditional vignettes: (1) valid causal inferences on the conditional distributions of the primary outcome of interest, given other factors, (2) balanced allocations across groups, and (3) a greater degree of interactivity for the survey respondent. We illustrate the utility of our method using a case example of a vignette study used to probe physicians’ attitudes toward an AI-embedded clinical system. In this example, a SMART vignette was used to randomize hypothetical scenarios to gain a better understanding of the causal impact of physician attitudes, given emerging evidence that a range of factors including previous decisions, play a role in influencing clinical decisions. We simulated hypothetical vignette studies under both SMART and conventional (i.e. single randomization at baseline) designs. We varied the number of factors for each study and fixed each factor to have two levels. Relative loss was used to compare the degree of imbalance between groups. Both designs had smaller relative losses with larger sample sizes. The SMART study design had lower loss than its conventional counterpart for all values of [Formula: see text] for all studies, indicating better balance. As demonstrated by the relative loss in our simulations, our proposed SMART vignette design has an advantage over the conventional design. This method holds promise in generating new knowledge in decision making scenarios occurring over multiple and discrete time points.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"325 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140703735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A dual debrief-based co-autoethnography of a humanitarian delegation member: Supporting Ukraine refugee mothers through ambiguous loss","authors":"Bilha Paryente, Rivi Frei-Landau","doi":"10.1177/20597991241241845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241241845","url":null,"abstract":"Autoethnography—a combination of autobiography and ethnography—focuses on the intersection of personal experiences and the culture in which they take place and is considered a viable method for exploring human experiences. The Russo-Ukrainian war has resulted in millions of forcibly displaced asylum-seeking refugees facing ambiguous loss. Whereas much is known about refugees’ support needs, little is known about the needs and experiences of the humanitarian delegation members (HDM) who assist them. Through a debrief-based co-autoethnographic account of a female HDM who supported Ukrainian refugee mothers and children on the Polish borders, we explored the lived experiences involved in such a mission. Specifically, we conducted a transnational dyadic autoethnography debrief-based co-autoethnography which included both verbal and photo-based debriefing (eight 2-hour sessions) alongside a reflexive (10-day) field diary analysis. Content analysis revealed cognitive dilemmas, emotional struggles, and practical adaptations occurring within the HDM’s three identity-related domains: personal, professional (psychologist), and ethnic. The methodology presented and demonstrated in this paper enhances our theoretical understanding of the challenges faced by HDMs and may contribute to better future design of HDM training.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"51 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140363312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth Wagemann, Natalia Donoso-Pardo, Germán Guzmán-Gundermann, Matías Quiroz-Torres
{"title":"Bridging architecture and social sciences to study home-based work: A socio-spatial representation method","authors":"Elizabeth Wagemann, Natalia Donoso-Pardo, Germán Guzmán-Gundermann, Matías Quiroz-Torres","doi":"10.1177/20597991241228978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241228978","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a methodology that combines methods of architectural representation with qualitative social science research to study housing, particularly, home-based work. Studies of home-based work have specialised in discussing the complexities of sharing the domestic and productive spaces. However, the literature shows that there is a methodological gap in approaching these complexities. Specifically, both social science and architectural techniques separately fail to represent the relationships and conflicts between these two spheres. This article addresses the following question: how to achieve a representation that corresponds to the complexity of the relationship between domestic and productive space in dwellings? To answer this question, our methodology combines the techniques of architecture (sketches, plans, maquettes and axonometries) and social science (observation, interviews and focus groups) to capture the relationship between domestic (reproductive) and work (productive) spaces in households. The method presents three scales of analysis: the micro (household), the meso (part of the neighbourhood) and the macro (neighbourhood). These different scales of analysis were applied in two case studies to test the performance of the method. These are the transitional emergency neighbourhoods built after the 2015 floods in Atacama (Chile). These cases were selected because, for many families, housing is also a place of income generation, and often emergency housing is a place of work, contributing to the economic recovery process after a disaster.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"269 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140472886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"All that glitters is not gold: Why randomized controlled trials are bronze standard (at best) in determining best practices for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder","authors":"Jennifer Rae Smith","doi":"10.1177/20597991241227844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991241227844","url":null,"abstract":"The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions or treatments across fields of physical and psychological medicine. While the RCT is well-placed for issues best addressed with a medical model approach—its origin story, the study and treatment of scurvy, an ideal exemplar—its stature and use must be challenged in cases of experiential phenomena, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where there is no one answer, treatment, or approach that suits all persons. Uncontested, its evidentiary superiority threatens to have deleterious effects on determining best practices for the treatment of PTSD.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140488856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review","authors":"Yi Zhou, Yuchun Zhou, Krisanna Machtmes","doi":"10.1177/20597991231217937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937","url":null,"abstract":"Mixed methods research (MMR) has been widely adopted in a plethora of disciplines. Integration is the pressing issue regarding the legitimation, the added value, and the quality of using MMR, though inadequate literature has discussed effective strategies used in the field of education, including school psychology, counseling, and teacher education. This study reviewed 119 recently published MMR articles in education using a four-dimension codebook with the goal to explore generic integration strategies and innovative strategies used by educational researchers in practice. As a result, three most commonly used generic integration strategies were identified, including (1) using a good mixed methods (MM) research question to guide research design, (2) using appropriate MM sampling strategy to obtain good data for achieving integration, and (3) using multiple MM data mixing strategies to facilitate integration. Moreover, five creative integration strategies were found at the method level: (1) using an innovative survey to collect both qualitative and quantitative data, (2) using visual support to collect data, (3) using high-tech methods to facilitate data collection, (4) using data visualization in mixing, and (5) quantitizing categorized QUAL data. This review summarizes and analyzes the effective integration strategies commonly used at the research design level and at the method level. It also provides valuable recommendations for educational researchers to explore creative strategies to achieve efficient integration when they conduct mixed methods research.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139158690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intelligence tests and the individual: Unsolvable problems with validity and reliability","authors":"Anouk van Hoogdalem, Anna MT Bosman","doi":"10.1177/20597991231213871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231213871","url":null,"abstract":"IQ scores are used in the Netherlands to determine whether an individual qualifies for special education or has access to healthcare. The term for this use of IQ is referred to as “slagboomdiagnostiek” (doorway diagnostics). Criticism has been voiced from the professional field regarding this policy. In this article, we will discuss whether the current Dutch policy is justified by examining the validity and reliability of IQ tests. Specifically, we will address whether the IQ test can be used in clinical decision-making regarding the individual. We argue that while the validity and reliability have been demonstrated at a group level, they do not hold true for the individual, leading to the conclusion that the current Dutch policy is not justified.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"59 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138587902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. van Veggel, Janet Allison, Sally Goldspink, H. Engward
{"title":"The presuppositional interview as a means of transparent reflexive practice in grounded theory","authors":"N. van Veggel, Janet Allison, Sally Goldspink, H. Engward","doi":"10.1177/20597991231212236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231212236","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how presuppositional interviews can develop reflexive transparency in grounded theory methodologies. Grounded Theory aims to generate understanding of a given socio-psychological process using a systematic methodology for gathering, analysing and interpreting data. As the researcher is intrinsic to this process, reflexivity is an essential tool to explore and challenge the researcher unknown presuppositions that influence the research process and findings. Reflexivity in practice is challenging as it aims at identifying unknown influences which are by nature, hidden. In this paper, we demonstrate how presuppositional interviews can be applied to Classic and Constructivist grounded theory, and to qualitative research in general. We illustrate this process with two practical case studies, demonstrating how the presuppositional interview can be utilised to enhance transparent reflexive practice. We suggest the presuppositional interview enables higher levels of reflexivity and subsequent positive impact on praxis and the research process.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139245065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}