Intelligence tests and the individual: Unsolvable problems with validity and reliability

Q1 Social Sciences
Anouk van Hoogdalem, Anna MT Bosman
{"title":"Intelligence tests and the individual: Unsolvable problems with validity and reliability","authors":"Anouk van Hoogdalem, Anna MT Bosman","doi":"10.1177/20597991231213871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IQ scores are used in the Netherlands to determine whether an individual qualifies for special education or has access to healthcare. The term for this use of IQ is referred to as “slagboomdiagnostiek” (doorway diagnostics). Criticism has been voiced from the professional field regarding this policy. In this article, we will discuss whether the current Dutch policy is justified by examining the validity and reliability of IQ tests. Specifically, we will address whether the IQ test can be used in clinical decision-making regarding the individual. We argue that while the validity and reliability have been demonstrated at a group level, they do not hold true for the individual, leading to the conclusion that the current Dutch policy is not justified.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"59 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodological Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231213871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IQ scores are used in the Netherlands to determine whether an individual qualifies for special education or has access to healthcare. The term for this use of IQ is referred to as “slagboomdiagnostiek” (doorway diagnostics). Criticism has been voiced from the professional field regarding this policy. In this article, we will discuss whether the current Dutch policy is justified by examining the validity and reliability of IQ tests. Specifically, we will address whether the IQ test can be used in clinical decision-making regarding the individual. We argue that while the validity and reliability have been demonstrated at a group level, they do not hold true for the individual, leading to the conclusion that the current Dutch policy is not justified.
智力测验与个人:无法解决的有效性和可靠性问题
智商分数在荷兰被用来确定一个人是否有资格接受特殊教育或获得医疗保健。IQ的这种用法被称为“炉渣诊断”(门口诊断)。专业领域对这一政策提出了批评。在这篇文章中,我们将通过检验智商测试的有效性和可靠性来讨论当前荷兰的政策是否合理。具体来说,我们将讨论智商测试是否可以用于个人的临床决策。我们认为,虽然有效性和可靠性在群体层面上得到了证明,但它们对个人并不适用,从而得出结论,目前荷兰的政策是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methodological Innovations
Methodological Innovations Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信