Reproductive Health Matters最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
5 Disputing Evidence: Canadian Health Professionals’ Responses to Evidence about Midwifery 有争议的证据:加拿大卫生专业人员对助产证据的回应
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.3138/9781487536961-005
{"title":"5 Disputing Evidence: Canadian Health Professionals’ Responses to Evidence about Midwifery","authors":"","doi":"10.3138/9781487536961-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487536961-005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87782264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
6 “Tell Me Where It Hurts”: A Case Study of the Impacts of Structural Violence, Syndemic Suffering, and Intergenerational Trauma on Indigenous Peoples’ Health “告诉我哪里疼”:结构性暴力、疾病痛苦和代际创伤对土著人民健康影响的案例研究
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.3138/9781487536961-006
{"title":"6 “Tell Me Where It Hurts”: A Case Study of the Impacts of Structural Violence, Syndemic Suffering, and Intergenerational Trauma on Indigenous Peoples’ Health","authors":"","doi":"10.3138/9781487536961-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487536961-006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75606762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
11 Seeking Disability Politics in Disability and Health-Related Non-profit Organizations 在残疾和与健康有关的非营利组织中寻求残疾政治
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.3138/9781487536961-011
{"title":"11 Seeking Disability Politics in Disability and Health-Related Non-profit Organizations","authors":"","doi":"10.3138/9781487536961-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487536961-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73484595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
10 Making Sense of Vaginal Mesh 了解阴道网的意义
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.3138/9781487536961-010
{"title":"10 Making Sense of Vaginal Mesh","authors":"","doi":"10.3138/9781487536961-010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487536961-010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81618043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal barriers to access abortion services through a human rights lens: the Uruguayan experience. 从人权角度看获得堕胎服务的法律障碍:乌拉圭的经验。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1422664
Lucía Berro Pizzarossa
{"title":"Legal barriers to access abortion services through a human rights lens: the Uruguayan experience.","authors":"Lucía Berro Pizzarossa","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1422664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1422664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) has increasingly gained importance in the field of international human rights law. The work of the United Nations (UN) bodies, in particular the recently adopted General Comment 22 (GC 22), has been instrumental in signalling the importance of the SRH legal framework and in setting clear guidelines to steer countries into enacting/modifying/repealing national laws in order to comply with their international obligations vis-à-vis SRH. Although within the region Uruguay is regarded as a pioneer in terms of women's status and rights, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, evidence points to a number of challenges. This article explores the extent to which the Uruguayan abortion law complies with the country's international human rights obligations as conceptualised by GC 22. It uses the Uruguayan abortion law, its regulatory decree, and the highest administrative court's decision in Alonso et al v. Poder Ejecutivo as the main pivots for the discussion. The results reveal that - in spite of the praise it receives at the international level and the adoption of a less restrictive abortion law - Uruguay has fallen short in adopting a legal framework that complies with the international standards and guarantees effective access to abortion services.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1422664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1422664","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35740843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Irish voters repealed the eighth: now it's time to ensure access to abortion care in law and in practice. 爱尔兰选民废除了第八项法案:现在是时候在法律和实践中确保堕胎护理的可及性了。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271
Ben Kasstan
{"title":"Irish voters repealed the eighth: now it's time to ensure access to abortion care in law and in practice.","authors":"Ben Kasstan","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary discusses Ireland's 25 May 2018 Referendum result to repeal the Eighth Amendment and has two key aims. Firstly, it encourages policy-makers to grasp the full potential of legislative reform by enabling and protecting women's access to abortion care within a continuum of sexual and reproductive healthcare options. Secondly, it calls for urgent clarity about access to abortion care in the interim period of legislative transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1513271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36510280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Dualities between Tunisian provider beliefs and actions in abortion care. 突尼斯提供者在堕胎护理方面的信念和行动之间的二元性。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1472486
Sarah Raifman, Selma Hajri, Caitlin Gerdts, Diana Foster
{"title":"Dualities between Tunisian provider beliefs and actions in abortion care.","authors":"Sarah Raifman,&nbsp;Selma Hajri,&nbsp;Caitlin Gerdts,&nbsp;Diana Foster","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1472486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1472486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite Tunisia's historically progressive reproductive health policies, Tunisian women now face significant challenges accessing legal abortion. Through in-depth interviews with providers at six facilities, we explored factors influencing provider attitudes about abortion and provider perspectives about abortion morality, safety, and legality. We found that gatekeepers (counsellors and front office staff) generally believed abortion was immoral, while obstetricians and gynecologists were more likely to support an individual's right to access abortion. However, providers' actions do not necessarily align with their stated beliefs regarding abortion; some providers who said they support abortion access generally held personal beliefs about when and for whom abortion is appropriate which influenced their provision of care. System-level barriers to abortion provision, such as a lack of resources, hinder some providers who may otherwise be willing to provide the service. These system-level barriers may also account for inconsistencies between providers' beliefs and actions related to abortion. Illuminating the complexity in provider beliefs and attitudes about abortion can help us to better understand whether and why abortion care is provided, as well as the factors that ultimately determine whether a woman can obtain an abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1472486","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36339128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: translating the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission's global report to local action. 人人享有性健康和生殖健康及权利:将古特马赫-柳叶刀委员会的全球报告转化为地方行动。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1487621
Laura Ferguson, Sapna Desai
{"title":"Sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: translating the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission's global report to local action.","authors":"Laura Ferguson,&nbsp;Sapna Desai","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1487621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1487621","url":null,"abstract":"The recently published report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (“The Commission”)1 has brought renewed vision and revived thinking around the sexual ...","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1487621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1487621","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36278080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
The Empower Nudge lottery to increase dual protection use: a proof-of-concept randomised pilot trial in South Africa. 提高双重保护使用率的 "赋权督促 "彩票:南非的概念验证随机试点试验。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1510701
Omar Galárraga, Jane Harries, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Diane Cooper, Susan E Short, Mark N Lurie, Abigail Harrison
{"title":"The Empower Nudge lottery to increase dual protection use: a proof-of-concept randomised pilot trial in South Africa.","authors":"Omar Galárraga, Jane Harries, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Diane Cooper, Susan E Short, Mark N Lurie, Abigail Harrison","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1510701","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1510701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to measure the preliminary efficacy of a pilot intervention, grounded in behavioural economics, increasing adherence of dual protection (simultaneous use of effective modern contraception and a barrier method, such as a condom) to protect against HIV, other sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancy. Between 2015 and 2016, 100 women aged 18-40 years, seeking post-abortion care in Cape Town, South Africa were recruited to Empower Nudge, a randomised controlled trial to test a lottery incentive intervention designed to increase dual protection. At baseline, the mean age of participants was 27 years; 82% of them were from South Africa; 58% self-identified as Black African; average education completed was 11.7 years. At three months, assignment to the lottery intervention was associated with higher odds of returning for study visits (OR: 6.0; 95%CI: 2.45 to 14.7, p < 0.01), higher condom use (OR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.43 to 14.1; p < 0.05), and higher use of dual protection (OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.01 to 9.9; p < 0.05). Only 60% of the study population returned after three months and only 38% returned after six months. Women who receive post-abortion care represent a neglected population with an urgent need for HIV and pregnancy prevention. Dual protection is a critically important strategy for this population. Lottery-based behavioural economics strategies may offer possible ways to increase dual protection use in this population. Further research with larger samples, longer exposure time, and more sites is needed to establish fully powered efficacy of lottery incentives for dual protection; using objective verification for monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1510701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/49/nihms-995210.PMC6242330.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36488678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stigma and agency: exploring young Kenyan women's experiences with abortion stigma and individual agency. 污名和代理:探索年轻的肯尼亚妇女堕胎污名和个人代理的经验。
Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1492285
Deeqa Mohamed, Nadia Diamond-Smith, Jesse Njunguru
{"title":"Stigma and agency: exploring young Kenyan women's experiences with abortion stigma and individual agency.","authors":"Deeqa Mohamed,&nbsp;Nadia Diamond-Smith,&nbsp;Jesse Njunguru","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1492285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1492285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although abortion is now legal in Kenya under expanded circumstances, access is limited and many providers and individuals still believe it is illegal. This study aimed to characterise Kenyan women's perceptions and experiences with abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) services in Nairobi regarding barriers to care, beliefs about abortion, and perceived stigma. We conducted 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews with Kenyan women aged 18-24 years who recently received abortion and PAC services at four Marie Stopes Kenya clinic sites in Nairobi. The most significant psychosocial barrier respondents faced in promptly seeking abortion and PAC was perceived stigma. In response to stigma, participants developed a sense of agency and self-reliance, which allowed them to prioritise their own healthcare needs over the concerns of others. To adequately address perceived stigma as a barrier to abortion- and PAC-seeking, significant cultural norm shifting is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1492285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1492285","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36356158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信