{"title":"INTERVENSI YUDISIAL DALAM ISU HUBUNGAN PUSAT–DAERAH: STUDI TERHADAP PRAKTIK MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI","authors":"Titon Slamet Kurnia","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.4081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.4081","url":null,"abstract":"The legal issue to be discussed in this article is the involvement of the Constitutional Court in adjudicating issues concerning the relationship between national – local government in general, and the distribution of power to the local government in particular. To be more specific, this article will criticise by delivering a casenote over the Constitutional Court decisions, i.e. Decision Number 87/PUU-XIII/2015, Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015, Decision Number 30/PUU-XIV/2016 and Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016. The casenote will notify the need to a deeper conceptual understanding of the differences between unitary State and federalism principles and its implication in giving prescriptions. This is a response to the Constitutional Court’s judicial opinion which tends weightier to federalism, instead of unitary State principle. According to this situation, it is recommended that the Constitutional Court should not review the constitutionality of laws which contain the legal issues concerning the relationship between national – local government in general, and the distribution of power to the local government in particular. This article uses conceptual and comparative approaches.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42028929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"GANTI KERUGIAN TERHADAP ANAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN","authors":"Achmad Murtadho","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.3954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3954","url":null,"abstract":"Children’s rights, as victim (of sexual offences) or perpetrator of crime, are not yet well secured or protected by law. This issue will be discussed by examining closely the substantive and procedural rules-regulation in the Law of Child Protection (no. 23 of 2002) and Law on Child Court (no. 11 of 2012). In addition, legal practice about children court shall also be highlighted. The author suggest that the prevailing substantive and procedural law has not yet be made adequately in response to the special needs of children victims of sexual abuse as well as accommodating the need for sufficient and fair compensation. It is as it is, due, amongst others, for the lack of victim perspective in the making of the children court system and how this system is being practiced.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42117479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION ON LARGE-SCALE INVESTMENT SCAM IN INDONESIA","authors":"Peter Jeremiah Setiawan, Hansel Ardison","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.3917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3917","url":null,"abstract":"Mass scale investment fraud (Ponzi) schemes result in protracted suffering for the victims. In this article the author investigates this crime from a juridical normative, case, and conceptual approach. From the very start potential victims may fall to promises of lucrative and safe investment schemes. In the eyes of the more prudent, it would or should be obvious that the collaborative business offers as presented contains logical flaws, running against common sense and is at the outset illegal. Notwithstanding, victims seems to fall easily into this trap, lured by the promise of getting easy, quick, and huge investment returns. In the end, even when this fraudulent investment scheme unravels, the government of law enforcement seems to be unable to act decisively and offer a satisfactory solution. Slow and ineffective government response in the end exacerbate economic loss and victims suffering.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42562333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"KEKUASAAN DISKRESI HAKIM PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL","authors":"Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.3843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3843","url":null,"abstract":"In this article the author discusses the discretionary powers granted to Labour Dispute Court judges. Better known, in comparison, are the discretionary powers of criminal court judges in determining penal sanctions or of Islamic court judges when granting dispensation to marry for underage couples. Using a juridical normative method, the discussion focusses on the principles underlying the Labour Dispute Court judge’ discretionary powers and its implementation. The analysis shows that Labour Dispute Court judges do have and enjoy discretionary powers in determining betterment of working conditions, how to best fill gaps or seek clarity in the face of ambiguous rules and regulations found in work contract, company regulations or collective work agreement.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43442832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ASPEK HUKUM PENAWARAN UMUM EFEK SECARA ELEKTRONIK","authors":"Niken Previanti","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.4248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.4248","url":null,"abstract":"The main issue discussed here, using a juridical normative method, regards the legal validity and implementation of, and legal protection given to investors, found in the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 41/POJK.04/2020 re. Electronic Public Offering of Equity, Debt Securities and/or Syaria’ Undivided Share. Important to note is the fact that the Financial Services Authority is established by virtue of Law No. 21 of 2011 to replace and take over the functions of the Capital Market and Financial Institution Supervisory Agency and the Central Bank in regulating and supervising Indonesian Banks and Capital Markets and lastly protect consumers in the financial services industry. Here should also mentioned the fact that the Capital Market Law (No. 8/1995) and its implementing regulations has yet to respond to how advances in information technology can be utilized to regulate-control and supervise public offering of shares or equity in the Capital Market.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46685498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"UPAYA PENCEGAHAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA PEKERJA DI SEKTOR FORMAL BERDASARKAN KEADAAN MEMAKSA PANDEMI COVID-19","authors":"Steven Suprantio","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.3921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3921","url":null,"abstract":"The business world everywhere including those in Indonesia cannot but felt the brunt of economic slowdown caused by the public health emergency (the COVID 19 pandemic). Quite a few national and local businesses have had to close their operation and lay off all its employees. Although the consensus between the government, workers (individuals and unions) as well as employers is to prevent and avoid termination of employment at all costs, the Law No. 11 of 2020, re. Job Creation allows massive dismissal of employees due to economic necessity or state of emergency. This article shall critically examine how the prevailing law, Law No. 11 of 2020 re. Job Creation regulates termination of employment in case of state of emergency.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47154088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"MAKNA MEDIASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA","authors":"Sudjana Sudjana","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.3716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3716","url":null,"abstract":"Art. 95(4) Law No. 28 of 2014 re. Copyright determines that mediation should be the preferred choice to settle copyright disputes, including those that relates to piracy and plagiarism. The issue to be discussed here is what would the legal consequence be in case this alternative dispute settlement is not utilized by disputants. This problem will be discussed using a juridical normative approach. Here, mediation is understood in the context of Law No. 30 of 1999 re. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 re. Mediation Procedure in Court Proceedings. The main finding of this legal research is that mediation, by law, should be offered in court or may be used out of court at any time by disputants, in civil dispute (claim for compensation) as well in criminal cases. Non utilisation does not have as consequence the cessation of existing court proceedings.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69458304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA","authors":"Rika Saraswati, Emanuel Boputra, Yuni Kusniati","doi":"10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066","url":null,"abstract":"In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children. Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody. Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49264578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERATURAN HUKUM DALAM ASPEK TRANSPARANSI TERHADAP RISIKO PADA LAYANAN PRIORITY BANKING","authors":"Renny Utaminingsih Harsanto","doi":"10.25123/vej.3381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3381","url":null,"abstract":"One of the new and innovative products offered in context of priority banking services is investment products. This research shall have a look at the transparency aspect of the risk management of this particular bank product offered to priority customers and will be conducted by a juridical normative method. In addition, the author also interviewed a number of key informants working in the banking industry at Bandung. The legal analysis conducted shows that while quite a number of rules and regulation in regard to risk management of bank investment products exist and are put in place, what it lacks, in terms of customer protection, is transparency.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43032062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PERLUASAN KEWENANGAN BPK DALAM MENGAWASI KEUANGAN NEGARA DI LINGKUP PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH","authors":"Dani Habibi, I. Hermawan","doi":"10.25123/vej.3512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3512","url":null,"abstract":"State budget management is tightly related to how the existing state law regulates fiscal relationship between the central government and the regional-local governments. The authority granted to regional-local government to manage their own budgeting more or less autonomously in practice results in mismanagement, misuse of available financial resources and even corruption. Unfettered and unchecked financial leakage at the regional government level may and have resulted in failure to realize and implement projects much needed by society. In light of this situation, a justified need arise for state intervention to monitor-control planning and realization of regional-local government budget. The author proposed the expansion of the Audit Board of the Republic Indonesia’s authority. They should not passively wait for financial reports to be submitted but actively assist regional-local government in planning their own budget, monitor the spending and realization of it and lastly, provide assistance in drafting the final report. ","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48537670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}