Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift最新文献_第5页

Faglig begrenset innflytelse, politisk begrenset legitimitet? 任何有限的影响力，政治上有限的合法性？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-04-05

Christine Magnussen

引用次数: 0

Mellom meritokrati og politisering? 在精英和政治之间？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-04-02

Jostein Askim, Tobias Bach

引用次数: 3

Faglig uavhengighet eller politisk lojalitet? 有独立性或政治忠诚度吗？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-04-04

D. Jacobsen, Harald Baldersheim, Nadja Sophia Bekkelund Kühn

引用次数: 0

Carl Henrik Knutsen: Demokrati og Diktatur

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-03

Lise Rakner

引用次数: 0

Johannes Bergh, Atle H. Haugsgjerd og Rune Karlsen: Valg og politikk siden 1945 – Velgere, institusjoner og kritiske hendelser i norsk politisk historie John Bergh、Atle H.Hauggerd和Rune Karlsen，1945年以来的选举和政治——挪威政治史上的选择者、制度和关键事件

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-02

Kari Tove Elvbakken

引用次数: 0

Strekk i laget for den ‘nordiske modellenʼ? 加入北欧模式团队？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-01

Eivor Vold Skjelbostad, Vilde Hernes

{"title":"Strekk i laget for den ‘nordiske modellenʼ?","authors":"Eivor Vold Skjelbostad, Vilde Hernes","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-01","url":null,"abstract":"Internationally, ‘the Nordic model’, with its comprehensive, institutionalized and universal welfare policies, is portrayed as unique; however, it faces challenges, particularly concerning the growth in immigration. Do the Nordic countries respond to these challenges with different solutions, and if so, why do some countries move further away from the basic principles of the Nordic model than others do? We investigate these questions through a comparative case study of Denmark and Norway’s historical development of welfare and integration policies, along with two political processes that resulted in different measures to promote refugees’ labor market integration after the refugee crisis in 2015. While Denmark introduced a particular ‘low wage’ track for refugees, Norway responded to the refugee crisis not by challenging the principle of universalism, but rather by embracing it. Denmark and Norway’s policy directions show clear traits of path dependency, further developing particular welfare and integration policies paths of the past. Copyright © 2021 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-03-01 Årgang 37, nr. 3-2021, s. 139–156 ISSN online: 1504-2936 VITENSKAPELIG PUBLIKASJON Additionally, the analysis reveals cross-national differences in the relevant actors’ self-interest along with the strength of the principle of universalism. Furtermore, the content of the principle of universalism in Denmark has developed to mostly involve Danish citizens – and exclude refugees and other immigrants. In summary, after the refugee crisis, Denmark drifted further from central principles in the Nordic model while Norway has embraced these same principles.","PeriodicalId":32253,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48563608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Geir Flikke: Russlands rebeller. Protest og reaksjon i Putins Russland (2011–2020) Geir Flnot，俄罗斯叛军。普京在俄罗斯的抗议和反应（2011-2020）

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-04

Helge Blakkisrud

引用次数: 0

Avgjerdsfelle eller tvitydig reform? 捍卫还是扭曲改革？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-02

Oddbjørn Bukve

{"title":"Avgjerdsfelle eller tvitydig reform?","authors":"Oddbjørn Bukve","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-02","url":null,"abstract":"The recent Norwegian local government reform showed a great deal of variation in the pace of amalgamations between counties and region types. The reform realized main objectives, such as a reduction in the number of small local government regimes and compliance between municipal borders and functional labor market regions, in a geographically uneven way. The article aims to explain this variation through two theoretical frameworks, Joint Decisions Traps (JDT) and Multiple Streams Framework (MSF). JDT expects that policymaking through cross level negotiations leads to the least common multiple, which is often status quo. Our analysis confirmed this. Where the outcome was different, it was mainly because local government regimes agreed on amalgamation and focused on problem-solving rather than negotiations. What JDT cannot explain is the variation of outcomes in time and space. For this purpose, MSF, which points out that complex policies and decision rules create ambiguity and make it possible to legitimize conflicting positions, seems more suitable. Ambiguity results in varying proposals among county governors and municipalities. This model also shows how variation in the political stream between different decision points in time and space leads to varying political process outcomes, a result we could find in the different phases of the local government reform.","PeriodicalId":32253,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41841206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Samarbeidsutvalgene mellom kommuner og helseforetak: Arena for maktkamp eller forum for deliberasjon?

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-03

Hilmar Rommetvedt

引用次数: 0

Hvem har makt i store utbyggingsprosjekter? 谁在大型开发项目中拥有权力？

Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2021-02-01

Baard Herman Borge, Elin Bårdsen, Grete Hagebakken

引用次数: 0