Global Security Health Science and Policy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Trying to end the war on the world: the campaign to proscribe military ecocide 试图结束对世界的战争:禁止军事生态灭绝的运动
Global Security Health Science and Policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23779497.2016.1208055
P. Hough
{"title":"Trying to end the war on the world: the campaign to proscribe military ecocide","authors":"P. Hough","doi":"10.1080/23779497.2016.1208055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2016.1208055","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Military ecocide, the destruction of the natural environment in the course of fighting or preparing for war, has a long history and remains a regular feature of contemporary conflicts. Efforts to prohibit this in international law were initiated after the US’ notorious defoliation campaign in the Vietnam War in the 1960s and have advanced since then. Legal ambiguities and the defence of military necessity have limited the application of this body of law but the proscription of ecocide has, nonetheless, progressed and looks set to develop further. Normative change driven by scientists, environmentalists and legal experts has raised awareness of and stigmatised such practises to the extent that recourse to the worst excesses of ecocide now appears to have lessened and some recompense for past crimes has been made. Military activities, though, still inflict a heavy cost on the environment.","PeriodicalId":32212,"journal":{"name":"Global Security Health Science and Policy","volume":"37 1","pages":"10 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85117695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Acute toxicity of sea-dumped chemical munitions: luminating the environmental toxicity of legacy compounds* 海洋倾倒化学弹药的急性毒性:阐明遗留化合物的环境毒性*
Global Security Health Science and Policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23779497.2016.1219962
Ilias Mohammed Abdullah Christensen, Morten Swayne Storgaard, P. Fauser, Steffen Foss Hansen, E. Baatrup, H. Sanderson
{"title":"Acute toxicity of sea-dumped chemical munitions: luminating the environmental toxicity of legacy compounds*","authors":"Ilias Mohammed Abdullah Christensen, Morten Swayne Storgaard, P. Fauser, Steffen Foss Hansen, E. Baatrup, H. Sanderson","doi":"10.1080/23779497.2016.1219962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2016.1219962","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a result of the disarmament of Germany after the Second World War, 65,000 tons of chemical munitions were dumped in the Baltic Sea. Approximately 13,000 tons containing chemical warfare agents (CWAs) of which 11,000 tons were dumped in the Bornholm Basin east of Bornholm. This paper addresses the ecotoxicity of compounds actually present in the Bornholm dumpsite by obtaining novel acute ecotoxicity data. EC50 values were successfully obtained for 12 CWAs from acute tests using Allivibrio fischeri (Microtox™). The three most toxic compounds were α-chloroacetophenone, 2-chlorovinylarsonic acid and 1,2,5-trithiepane having EC50 values of 11.20, 31.20 and 1170 μg L−1, respectively. A. fischeri demonstrated hormesis when exposed to triphenylarsine and triphenylarsine oxide at concentrations of 100 and 50 mg L−1, respectively. Four different mixtures were assessed including compounds which were dissolvable; a mixture of sulphur mustard degradation products, a mixture of the three most toxic sulphur mustard compounds, a mixture of organoarsenical degradation products and a mixture of all compounds. The mixtures deviate by a factor of 1.5–2.5 from the prediction of the concentration addition model and hence, the mixtures demonstrate no sign of synergism or antagonism. The compounds presented in this study are mainly CWA.","PeriodicalId":32212,"journal":{"name":"Global Security Health Science and Policy","volume":"123 1","pages":"39 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77071146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书