{"title":"5 The demarcation problem","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-006","url":null,"abstract":"§1 This chapter returns to the semantic web of terms related to science before modernity, coupling it with the problem of defining and demarcating science from similar human activities today. Chapter 3 has made clear that in Antiquity, science was not yet a clearly defined single concept – it bore several names – but that its principles were known and practised by some. One might say that the epicentre of what would be science for us today lay somewhere between ἐπιστήμη, φιλοσοφία, τέχνη, μάθημα, and ἱστορία. Although we do have a single name for ‘science’ from the twelfth century onward, science is, of course, still related to similar activities that mostly also go back to antique concepts. Viewed diachronically, this means that we can envisage a complicated and shifting web of concepts around what we tried to define as ‘science’ in the previous chapter. Today, the concept ‘science’ is related to and stands in some kind of contrast to activities such as religion, magic, philosophy, pseudo-science, and technology. It will be best not to look for a single criterion of demarcation to keep science apart from all these other activities, which is likely to be too wide or too strict. For instance, that of Popper uses falsifiability, which would seem to lead to the exclusion of much of even contemporary natural science. Today, the human activity most difficult to separate from science may well be what is variously called pseudo-, crackpot, or junk science. In contrast to the other concepts in figure 4, this one arose only after science had established itself as a crucially important category in life, one that had become worth imitating. Unfortunately, there is a lot of such junk science published these days. Gruenberger (1962) half-jokingly proposed an interesting measure for such ‘crackpotness’; the factors it takes into consideration are public verifiability, predictability, controlled experiments, Ockham’s Razor, fruitfulness, ability to communicate, humility, open-mindedness, Fulton non-sequitur paranoia, the ‘dollar complex’, and statistics compulsion. Each of these (or the lack of them) gets a score; the scores are then summed up. The higher the result, the more the author in question is a ‘crackpot scientist’. Occasionally, some established scholar or scientist makes fun of junk science tendencies in a field by deliberately publishing junk science that fits into a current mainstream narrative but is completely devoid of scientific content. The most famous example is Sokal (1996); more recently, a paper about ‘The Conceptual Pe-","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125427070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"11 University science: An Aristotelian Revolution","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129052591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"8 Foundations of Roman science in Latin","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-009","url":null,"abstract":"Man kann, vielleicht etwas überspitzt, sagen, dass die lateinische Literatur ihrer Wurzel und ihrem Wesen nach Übersetzungsliteratur im weiteren Sinne ist und dass die Sprachund Stilmittel der lateinischen Hochund Literatursprache in Poesie und Prosa weitgehend auf dem Boden der Übertragung aus dem Griechischen gewachsen sind und sich entfaltet haben. ‘It can be said, perhaps exaggerating somewhat, that Latin literature is, in its roots and nature, translation literature in a broad sense, and that the linguistic and stylistic devices of Latin standard and literary language in poetry and prose largely grew and developed on the ground of translations from Greek.’ Puelma (1980: 139)","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125559727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121462270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"14 The demise of Latin as language of science","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-015","url":null,"abstract":"§1 The chronological tour of authors and Denkstile in the preceding chapters will now be broken off: from the eighteenth century onward, most important authors no longer wrote in Latin. A comprehensive study of the circumstances of Latin’s demise in the sciences and at the universities has yet to be written. Only selected aspects of a topic that has only been studied for single cases can be presented here, with the goal of finding the major driving forces that led to the use of vernacular tongues in fields where Latin had been the only option for more than a millennium. At the advent of the printing press, Latin still had a very comfortable lead as the written language of Western Europe. 70 % of all incunabula were written in Latin. First, Latin’s demise in different contexts is studied (§2); some problems of the change of linguistic medium, which led to a group of three languages taking over Latin’s rôle, are then discussed (§3); some reasons for this change are considered (§§4–8); and finally, an excursus on artificial languages (§10), a topic that became important precisely when Latin’s hegemony was broken, concludes this chapter.","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132113641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"21 How are new scientific concepts expressed?","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-022","url":null,"abstract":"percrassus","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126302423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"24 On the relation between science, culture, and language","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110745832-025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745832-025","url":null,"abstract":"actuare, agibilis, appetibilitas, assumptibilis, campsorius, causali-tas, certitudinalis, cognoscibilitas, cognoscitivus, cointelligere, communicabilitas, concausa, condicionalis, condicionatus, condignativus, condignitas, condividere, connaturalitas, consi-liabilis, consiliativus, conspecialis, constrictivus, contiguatio, contrapassio, contrapassum, contumeliatio, contumeliativus, deratiocinari, deteriorativus, difformiter, dimensivus, dinoti-ca, discontinuare, discontinuatio, discontinuus, disputativus, divinativus, doctrinatio, executi-vus, exemplaritas, exercitivus, exigitivus, fontalitas, formalitas, gubernativus, habilitatio, ideare, ideatio, immediatio, immutativus, impotentialitas, improbabilitas, improcessibilis, in-communicabilitas, incompossibilis, incorporeitas, indisciplinabilis, individuare, individuatio, infiguratio, iniustificatio, inquisitive, intimativus, inventivus, iudicativus, iudicatorium, laesi-vus, latitatio, legispositivus, limpiditas, materialitas, meliorativus, nutrimentalis, oboedientia-lis, occasionare, partialitas, parvificentia, parvificus, parvipensio, per-vietas, postpraedicamentum, potentialitas, praeacceptio, praeconsiliatus, praedeterminatio, praevolatio, principativus, protestativus, quidditativus, regitivus, reminiscitivus, satisfactivus, speculabilis, sperativus, subactivus, subalternare, subauctoritas, sub-stantificator, substantivare, supersubstantialitas, tactivus, unitive, We review the history of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat) biol-ogy from its initial discovery through the elucidation of the CRISPR-Cas9 enzyme mechan-ism, which has set the stage for remarkable developments using this technology to modify, regulate, or mark genomic loci in a wide variety of cells and organisms from all three do-mains of life. These results highlight a new era in which genomic manipulation is no longer a bottleneck to experiments, paving the way toward fundamental discoveries in biology, with applications in all branches of biotechnology, as well as strategies for human therapeu-tics.","PeriodicalId":321723,"journal":{"name":"Latin as the Language of Science and Learning","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122244562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}