Nordic Wittgenstein Review最新文献_第8页

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2019-01-29 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V8I1.3511

Yrsa Neuman

引用次数: 0

?? Wittgenstein to Sraffa: Two newly-discovered letters from February and March 1934 ?？维特根斯坦致斯拉法:两封新发现的1934年2月和3月的信件

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2019-01-29 DOI: 10.15845/nwr.v8i1.3512

A. Pichler

引用次数: 1

Review of "Wittgenstein and Modernism" edited by Michael LeMahieu and Karen Zumhagen-Yekplé 《维特根斯坦与现代主义》书评，作者:Michael LeMahieu和Karen zumhagen - yekpleve

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3519

Olli Lagerspetz

引用次数: 0

Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Nachlass in the UNESCO Memory of the World register 路德维希·维特根斯坦的《纳赫拉斯》被联合国教科文组织列入世界记忆名录

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3517

A. Schmidt

引用次数: 0

Stanley Cavell’s Argument of the Ordinary 斯坦利·卡维尔的《平凡之辩

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3521

A. Baz

{"title":"Stanley Cavell’s Argument of the Ordinary","authors":"A. Baz","doi":"10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3521","url":null,"abstract":"My overall aim is to show that there is a serious and compelling argument in Stanley Cavell’s work for why any philosophical theorizing that fails to recognize what Cavell refers to as “our common world of background” as a condition for the sense of anything we say or do, and to acknowledge its own dependence on that background and the vulnerability implied by that dependence, runs the risk of rendering itself, thereby, ultimately unintelligible. I begin with a characterization of Cavell’s unique way of inheriting Austin and Wittgenstein – I call it “ordinary language philosophy existentialism” – as it relates to what Cavell calls “skepticism”. I then turn to Cavell’s response to Kripke in “The Argument of the Ordinary”, which is different from all other responses to Kripke’s Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language in that Cavell’s response, while theoretically powerful, is at the same time also existentialist, in the sense that Cavell finds a way of acknowledging in his writing the fundamental fact that his writing (thinking) constitutes an instance of what he is writing (thinking) about. This unique achievement of Cavell’s response to Kripke is not additional to his argument, but essential to it: it enables him not merely to say, but to show that, and how, Kripke’s account falsifies what it purports to elucidate, and thereby to show that the theoretical question of linguistic sense is not truly separable, not even theoretically, from the broadly ethical question of how we relate to others, and how we conduct ourselves in relation to them from one moment to the next.","PeriodicalId":31828,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Wittgenstein Review","volume":"37 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72956939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Social Criticism, Moral Reasoning and the Literary Form 社会批评、道德推理与文学形式

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3512

Leonidas Tsilipakos

引用次数: 3

"Give Me an Example": Peter Winch and Learning from the Particular “给我一个例子”:彼得·温奇和从特殊中学习

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3466

O. Beran

引用次数: 3

Wittgenstein on British Anti-Nazi Propaganda 维特根斯坦论英国反纳粹宣传

Nordic Wittgenstein Review Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI: 10.15845/NWR.V7I2.3518

Nuno Venturinha, Jonathan A. Smith