Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal最新文献_第9页

Populizm, autorytaryzm, Polska. Maciej Gdula o konsekwencjach polskiej transformacji liberalnej

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.7

Katarzyna Haremska

引用次数: 0

Pięćdziesiąt twarzy Graya. Uwagi na marginesie książki Beaty Polanowskiej-Sygulskiej John Gray i krytyka liberalnego legalizmu

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.6

Paweł Kłoczowski

引用次数: 0

Język filozoficznie odczarowany. O Przewodniku po filozofii języka

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.10

Grzegorz Trela

引用次数: 0

Przypływy i odpływy liberalizmu

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.5

Piotr Bartula

引用次数: 0

Konserwatyzm, ale jaki? Wokół książki Państwo znikąd Bronisława Łagowskiego

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.9

P. Tendera

引用次数: 0

Katolicy w państwie liberalnego pluralizmu. Miesięcznik Znak wobec sekularyzacji (lata 1989-2000)

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.2

Miłosz Puczydłowki

{"title":"Katolicy w państwie liberalnego pluralizmu. Miesięcznik Znak wobec sekularyzacji (lata 1989-2000)","authors":"Miłosz Puczydłowki","doi":"10.24917/20841043.8.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.8.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"Catholics in the liberal pluralism state. Facing secularisation in the monthly Znak (1989–2000): The aim of this paper is to analyse the philosophical, sociological, politological, theological and press articles on the issue of secularisation that were published in the monthly Znak during 1989–2000. A definition of secularisation is employed that was coined by Charles Taylor in A secular age (Taylor, 2007). It is understood as the endurance of religion in a plural society. The paper delineates three stands that the Znak Catholics have taken when facing secularisation: (1) an open catholicity; (2) a liberal faith; and (3) an ambiguous one. (1) The first approach involves confronting one’s liberal, secular partners in public debates, with a focus on finding some of their points acceptable according to the Church doctrine. Nevertheless, it is burdened with the anxiety of losing one’s own identity. (2) The second approach emphasises some of the connections between liberal and Christian ideas. A particular meaning of liberty and authenticity in human existence is stressed. (3) In the third approach, although it does not admit to its malevolence, the liberal ideas are treated with sharp criticism. Liberalism is accused of limiting the role of religion in a plural society. In the conclusion to the paper, an attempt is made to present the current relations between liberalism and Christianity in Po‑ land. A deep recent transformation is revealed. It is believed that Znak will lose its function as a continuity sustainer in the next few years.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84072378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ideowe zmagania Stefana Kisielewskiego z polskim komunizmem

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.8.1.1

Miłowit Kuniński

{"title":"Ideowe zmagania Stefana Kisielewskiego z polskim komunizmem","authors":"Miłowit Kuniński","doi":"10.24917/20841043.8.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.8.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"Stefan Kisielewski’s intellectual struggle with Polish communism: Stefan Kisielewski (1911–1991) a Polish novelist, composer, music critic, essayist, feature writer and a politician, was an exceptional personage in post‑World War II Poland. In his features, published in Tygodnik Powszechny since 1945, in a light, ironic and allusive way to prevent censorship, he described the Polish reality that his readers were acquainted with, in a way that revealed the real causes of the phenomena he observed. The truth was simple: the communist reality was the result of politico‑economic system that was imposed based on a Marxist theory of economy. Kisielewski’s criticism of communism was not just a matter of a keen observation and sensible conclusions; it was based on his studies of Marxism that he began before World War II. In turn, in Wilhelm Röpke’s Die Gesellschaftskrisis der Gegenwart (1942), he found an accurate characterisation of the socialist economy and an explanation for its non‑functioning. The second important reason for his criticism of communism was Kisielewski’s Catholicism, which operated as a counter‑balance to Marxism, combined with the idea of a liberal‑democratic regime. In his later years, Kisielewski criticised the social teachings of the Catholic Church, and suggested a new idea that they were based on “the theology of profit” (a prefiguration of the encyclical Centesimus Annus) as an ideological justification of the attitudes necessary for the functioning of the market economy in Poland. He even suggested the implementation of a dictatorship to avoid long parliamentary democratic procedures, and in this way to establish a quick and effective market economy on the ruins of socialism.","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84657279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Polemika przeciwko polemice. Plutarcha krytyka epikureizmu 反对争论的论据。普鲁塔克对美学的批判

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.7.2.1

Krzysztof Łapiński

引用次数: 0

Ist die Heideggersche Philosophie des Seyns Mystik 论海德格尔的神秘主义哲学

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.7.2.9

Łukasz Kołoczek

引用次数: 0

Kilka uwag na temat polemiki Plutarcha ze stoikami 关于普鲁塔克与斯多葛论战的几点评论

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.24917/20841043.7.2.2

Michał Damski

引用次数: 0