Idealism, Relativism, and Realism最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Metaontological Deflationism and Ontological Realism 论通缩主义与论实在论
Idealism, Relativism, and Realism Pub Date : 2020-05-05 DOI: 10.1515/9783110670349-007
{"title":"Metaontological Deflationism and Ontological Realism","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110670349-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670349-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300911,"journal":{"name":"Idealism, Relativism, and Realism","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114816810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jacobi’s Dare: McDowell, Meillassoux, and Consistent Idealism 《雅各比的挑战:麦克道尔、梅亚苏和一致的理想主义》
Idealism, Relativism, and Realism Pub Date : 2020-05-05 DOI: 10.1515/9783110670349-003
Anthony Bruno, Jacobi’s Dare
{"title":"Jacobi’s Dare: McDowell, Meillassoux, and Consistent Idealism","authors":"Anthony Bruno, Jacobi’s Dare","doi":"10.1515/9783110670349-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670349-003","url":null,"abstract":": Does Kant ’ s restriction of knowledge to phenomena undermine objectivity? Jacobi argues that it does, daring the transcendental idealist to abandon the thing in itself and embrace the “ strongest idealism ” . According to Bruno, McDowell and Meillassoux adopt a similar critique of Kant ’ s conception of objectivity and, more significantly, echo Jacobi ’ s dare to profess the strongest ideal-ism – what McDowell approvingly calls “ consistent idealism ” and Meillassoux disparagingly calls “ extreme idealism ” . After exposing the Cartesian projection on which Jacobi ’ s critique rests, Bruno shows that McDowell ’ s and Meillassoux ’ s critiques make the same projection. He argues that whereas McDowell offers an inconsistent alternative to Kant ’ s idealism, Meillassoux begs the question against it. Finally, Bruno sketches the account of objectivity that follows from Kant ’ s distinction between general and transcendental logic.","PeriodicalId":300911,"journal":{"name":"Idealism, Relativism, and Realism","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114540592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信