The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty最新文献

Thinking with Rorty about How to Make Philosophy more Livable 与罗蒂一起思考如何让哲学更宜居

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-15

Susan Dieleman

引用次数: 0

What Should Rorty Say about Relativism? 罗蒂应该对相对主义说些什么?

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-8

Carol Rovane

引用次数: 0

Rorty's Reconstruction of Epistemology 罗蒂对认识论的重构

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-9

R. Calcaterra

引用次数: 0

Rorty, Habermas, and Radical Social Criticism 罗蒂、哈贝马斯与激进社会批判

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-14

M. Bacon, Nat Rutherford

引用次数: 1

The Philosophy of Richard Rorty 理查德·罗蒂的哲学

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-1

G. Marchetti

引用次数: 0

Rorty as Liberal Ironist Peace Warrior 罗蒂是自由反讽主义者和平战士

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-3

S. Clough

引用次数: 0

The Rorty-Dworkin Debate 罗蒂-德沃金之争

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-4

Raff Donelson

{"title":"The Rorty-Dworkin Debate","authors":"Raff Donelson","doi":"10.4324/9780429324734-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324734-4","url":null,"abstract":"Ronald Dworkin and Richard Rorty are sometimes thought to be diametrically opposed philosophers, particularly in their approach to foundational questions in moral thought. Dworkin is a champion of truth and objectivity in morality. Rorty, by contrast, is a great pragmatist who subscribed to a defated vision of truth and unambiguously renounced objectivity, in favor of what he called “solidarity”.1 If their stated -isms and alliances were not evidence enough of discord, they also criticized one another in print, particularly on these foundational, or metaethical, questions. The point of this chapter is to show that things are not what they seem: Rorty and Dworkin largely agree on metaethics. The difference between them is largely a difference in emphasis. The layout of the chapter is as follows. In Section 1, I explain in further detail why Rorty and Dworkin are thought to disagree. I outline their commitments and summarize their direct criticisms of one another with respect to metaethics. In Section 2, I begin the rapprochement. I note that several scholars have identifed something “pragmatist” in Dworkin’s thought, particularly in his legal thought. This work, then, shows that he might be closer to Rorty than frst appearances suggest. Nevertheless, that work, taken as a whole, suffers from a few limitations. What pragmatism means for those various theorists is either too vague or too various to be helpful. Also, even when some of this work clearly explains a sense in which Dworkin is a legal pragmatist, it fails to explain how pragmatism also fgures in Dworkin’s moral philosophy. A further limitation is that this secondary literature confuses how specifcally Rortyan Dworkin’s moral thought turns out to be. That last limitation – not recognizing the specifcally Rortyan elements of Dworkin’s moral thought – this is examined and corrected in Section 3. In the fnal substantive part of the chapter, Section 4, I try to diagnose this faux fght between Rorty and Dworkin. I argue that the difference is largely a matter of emphasis. Dworkin stresses his continuity with traditional moral realism, while registering some complaints. Rorty castigates realism before admitting that he can assent to the basic structure of such a view. If this is a case of “six of one, and a half-dozen of the other”, one might be led to think any further comparison of what these thinkers say","PeriodicalId":298858,"journal":{"name":"The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126302596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Achieving Whose Country? Rorty and Baldwin on the United States 成就谁的国家?罗蒂和鲍德温论美国

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-18

S. Sullivan

引用次数: 0

Bildung, Unimportance, and Moral Progress 教养、不重要与道德进步

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-5

S. Marchetti

引用次数: 0

Rorty and Experience 罗蒂与经验

The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.4324/9780429324734-10

Christopher J. Voparil

引用次数: 1