{"title":"Mapping the automation of Twitter communications on climate change, sustainability, and environmental crises — a review of current research","authors":"Stefan Daume , Petter Bjersér , Victor Galaz","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101384","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online social media such as the microblog Twitter are key digital arenas shaping the public discourse on important societal topics. Automated social media accounts, so-called ‘social bots,’ have emerged as a controversial phenomenon, proven to both disrupt and support online communications on topics such as political elections and public health. To what extent social bots also impact online conversations on climate change, environmental crises, and sustainability remains unknown however.</p><p>We present a review of current research on social bots and their potential impact on Twitter discourses around climate, environmental, and sustainability topics; we collect the methods used to detect social bots, approaches to determine their online impact, extract a high-level normative assessment of automation, and summarize the recommendations for stakeholders to manage the challenges created by automation. We note a lack of common, comparable methodologies to robustly assess the impacts of social bots, which contributes to simplistic causal claims about their impact on public opinion and behavior. We identify research needs and offer methodological recommendations for future research on this topic of growing importance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101384"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001318/pdfft?md5=5d802043517e8ef486a9a5d69fe67c8f&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001318-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138413129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amos Laar , Julia Tagwireyi , Habiba Hassan-Wassef
{"title":"From dialogues to action: commitments by African governments to transform their food systems and assure sustainable healthy diets","authors":"Amos Laar , Julia Tagwireyi , Habiba Hassan-Wassef","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101380","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The 2021 United Nations Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) and associated dialogues brought together diverse food system actors and stakeholders from across the globe to take action on transforming food systems. These actions included pledges and expression of commitments from both state and nonstate actors to transform their food systems. State actor commitments are visions of what governments expect of their food systems by 2030, and their aspirations to achieve those expectations. This paper reviews pledges made by African Heads of State at the 2021 UNFSS and examines how responsive those commitments are to three dimensions of sustainable healthy diets, namely, nutrition and health, socio-economic, and environmental. Second, the paper assesses how responsive the commitments are to the World Health Organization’s “priority food systems policy actions” that include nutrition labeling, marketing regulation, public food procurement, fiscal policies, food fortification, reformulation, and food safety. We operationally define responsiveness as alignment or relatedness of the commitments to the dimensions of sustainable healthy diets, or the priority policies. We contextualize our appraisals using available literature on the subject.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92065403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disaster resilience in conflict-affected areas: a review of how armed conflicts impact disaster resilience","authors":"Elisabeth Lio Rosvold","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101381","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The geographic overlap between disasters and armed conflict is substantial, making disaster resilience intrinsically linked to conflict exposure. Despite this, there is only a very small literature investigating how armed conflict impacts disaster risk and resilience in affected areas. This article reviews the most recent literature on armed conflict and disaster resilience and shows that while disasters can increase the risk of violent outcomes in contexts where governments and populations are particularly vulnerable to their impacts, these very features are also influenced by the presence of armed conflict. Thus, the relationship is circular, and conflict and disaster risk reinforce each other, and should not be dealt with separately. The review provides an overview for scholars and practitioners who wish to assess the current understanding of how disasters and conflicts impact affected communities’ resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101381"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001288/pdfft?md5=bb58f2c5e1015c558668fc411c08c049&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001288-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Monitoring agroecological transitions: how to measure complexity in an agile manner","authors":"Mark T van Wijk , James Hammond , Carlos Barahona","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101377","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently, a series of frameworks have been developed that aim to assess the agroecological performance of farming systems. These frameworks are characterized by a heavy load of dimensions and indicators, making application of these frameworks in the practical setting of agricultural development<span> projects difficult as well as expensive. In this position paper, we look at recent developments in agile data collection and how these can help to further improve the monitoring of agroecological transitions in general. More specifically, in this position paper, we i) outline a flexible and light approach to assess agroecological transitions in a given project setting, ii) provide examples of how it can be applied, and iii) highlight how it can help local agents to support transitions as well as can generate a generic information base for agroecology.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101377"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91989038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Holdsworth , Simon Kimenju , Greg Hallen , Amos Laar , Samuel O Oti
{"title":"Review of policy action for healthy environmentally sustainable food systems in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Michelle Holdsworth , Simon Kimenju , Greg Hallen , Amos Laar , Samuel O Oti","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101376","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are experiencing multiple burdens of malnutrition. Rising overweight/obesity coexist alongside persistent burdens of under-nutrition and multiple micronutrient deficiencies. Poverty and social inequity remain key drivers of unhealthy diets and malnutrition. Diets in SSA are increasingly transitioning towards unhealthy (energy-dense, nutrient-poor and unsafe) and environmentally unsustainable diets. Healthy, sustainable food systems are required to deal with these considerable challenges equitably, so policy action needs to balance the health, environmental and economic dimensions of diets and food systems. We review evidence in recent literature for which policy actions have the best chance of success in SSA by appraising their likely impact, relevance, cost/affordability and feasibility to help guide policymakers and researchers in their development and evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101376"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001239/pdfft?md5=f4eecd476182b7d8b980cdb238cb628f&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001239-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trent Blare , Soraya Roman , Cesar del Pozo Loayza , Ross Mary Borja , Pedro J. Oyarzun , Mariana Alem Zabalaga
{"title":"The role of demand in the agroecological transition: an analysis of recent literature","authors":"Trent Blare , Soraya Roman , Cesar del Pozo Loayza , Ross Mary Borja , Pedro J. Oyarzun , Mariana Alem Zabalaga","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101378","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Much of the attention of the agroecological (AE) movement has focused on the adoption of AE farming practices. While the utilization of these practices is essential to the AE transition, AE food systems will only arise when the demand for AE products emerges. This review synthesizes the research that has examined the role of demand in the AE transition. We explore what lessons have been learned in understanding consumer interest in products with AE attributes and how demand for AE products has helped spur or hinder the AE transition. We conclude with an analysis of the next steps in advancing our knowledge to better understand how to enhance the demand for AE products to build AE food systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101378"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stefan Partelow , Furqan Asif , Christophe Béné , Simon Bush , Aisa O Manlosa , Ben Nagel , Achim Schlüter , Vishnumurthy M Chadag , Afrina Choudhury , Steven M Cole , Richard S Cottrell , Stefan Gelcich , Rebecca Gentry , Jessica A Gephart , Marion Glaser , Teresa R Johnson , Malin Jonell , Geshe Krause , Andreas Kunzmann , Holger Kühnhold , Giovanni M Turchini
{"title":"Aquaculture governance: five engagement arenas for sustainability transformation","authors":"Stefan Partelow , Furqan Asif , Christophe Béné , Simon Bush , Aisa O Manlosa , Ben Nagel , Achim Schlüter , Vishnumurthy M Chadag , Afrina Choudhury , Steven M Cole , Richard S Cottrell , Stefan Gelcich , Rebecca Gentry , Jessica A Gephart , Marion Glaser , Teresa R Johnson , Malin Jonell , Geshe Krause , Andreas Kunzmann , Holger Kühnhold , Giovanni M Turchini","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101379","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A greater focus on governance is needed to facilitate effective and substantive progress toward sustainability transformations in the aquaculture sector. Concerted governance efforts can help move the sector beyond fragmented technical questions associated with intensification and expansion, social and environmental impacts, and toward system-based approaches that address interconnected sustainability issues. Through a review and expert-elicitation process, we identify five engagement arenas to advance a governance agenda for aquaculture sustainability transformation: (1) setting sustainability transformation goals, (2) cross-sectoral linkages, (3) land–water–sea connectivity, (4) knowledge and innovation, and (5) value chains. We then outline the roles different actors and modes of governance can play in fostering sustainability transformations, and discuss action items for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to operationalize activities within their engagement arenas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101379"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001264/pdfft?md5=8c5d7894495519bc3e477f7aadce31bf&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001264-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Serious games in natural resource management: steps toward assessment of their contextualized impacts","authors":"Romina Rodela , Erika N. Speelman","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101375","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural resource management (NRM) is complex and often characterized by a multitude of stakeholders at different scales, each with their own goals. Increasingly, serious games are used in these contexts as (social) learning tools and boundary objects to facilitate collective learning and support local decision-making. However, despite the well-established interest, the scientific evidence of the impact of serious games remains a debated topic. Here, we present a brief overview of the most recent literature. Our aim is to contribute to that debate with a conceptual proposal based on the issue-attention cycle, we suggest to clearly linking game objective, desired learning, and associated impact assessment method to support researchers and practitioners in their efforts to move from knowledge to action while building scientific evidence about the impact of serious games.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001227/pdfft?md5=59e496c9bdf5aae3392f440a6cd9bb51&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001227-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meine van Noordwijk , Grace B Villamor , Gert Jan Hofstede , Erika N Speelman
{"title":"Relational versus instrumental perspectives on values of nature and resource management decisions","authors":"Meine van Noordwijk , Grace B Villamor , Gert Jan Hofstede , Erika N Speelman","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101374","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Instrumental and relational values of nature to people affect what is considered and portrayed as rational and aligned with moral foundations. Decision-making on natural resources involves individuals, collectives, and their modes of communication. Effective science-policy interfaces — to change the game and transform development trajectories — need to speak to both instrumental and relational rationality. It requires salient, credible, and legitimate syntheses of knowledge on recognized (or emerging) issues for public concern. Beyond the ‘instrumental’ aspects of avoidable harm (nature as protector) and cost-effective care provided to people by nature-based solutions, ‘relational values’ invoke further foundations of morality and of human priorities beyond physiological needs and primary security. Effective communication in issue-attention and policy decision cycles involves acknowledging the plurality of value perspectives and (associated) decision-making modes. We propose hypotheses on how the interaction of values and decision-making modes can be further understood and used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101374"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001215/pdfft?md5=d50891aecba4b5adc304328dd0414dda&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001215-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meine van Noordwijk , Grace B Villamor , Gert Jan Hofstede , Erika N Speelman
{"title":"Editorial overview: Values and decisions: How can development trajectories transform","authors":"Meine van Noordwijk , Grace B Villamor , Gert Jan Hofstede , Erika N Speelman","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101365","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiple ways of communicating values of nature interact with human decisions in natural resource management. The relative emphasis on relational and instrumental values of nature changes with variation in any of the nested social scales: individual motivation, rationality, morality, sociality, culture, and worldviews. This collection of papers reviews how values and decisions interact in the forest–water–people nexus, suggesting conclusions for current policy discourse on transforming development trajectories. Rationality (taking steps to meet goals) and relationality (taking steps to maintain relations) differ in their reference to explicit (short-term) and implicit (long-term) goals. Relational rationality, and the relational value concept it infers, complements instrumental rationality and goal-oriented, instrumental values. Three progressive tipping points in how, historically, human and social systems relate to nature are 1) technological control over nature, 2) nature strikes back, driving environmental institutions and policies controlling technology, and 3) relational values of nature complementing instrumental ones in policy design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101365"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92014274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}