发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Psychology, Evolution & Gender最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Is male homosexuality maternally linked 男同性恋有母系关系吗
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660010024599
J. Mcknight, J. P. Malcolm
{"title":"Is male homosexuality maternally linked","authors":"J. Mcknight, J. P. Malcolm","doi":"10.1080/14616660010024599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660010024599","url":null,"abstract":"Is male homosexuality maternally linked? In 1993 Hamer et al. noted a preponderance of male relatives in the maternal lines of gay men relative to heterosexual controls, and then reported a possible X-chromosome linkage to male homosexuality. This paper is the first notice of an ongoing investigation measuring whether this is a maternal inheritance effect or a general fecundity effect through the female line. The test of Hamer's proposition is, first, in finding a difference in the numbers of gay uncles and male cousins between maternal and paternal parental lines; then, in finding a difference in the numbers of gay male cousins between the male and female maternal lines; and last, in finding an increased reproductive rate for maternal line relatives, particularly female ones. A genetic pedigree was taken of a matched sample of 60 straight and 60 homosexual men drawn from the gay population of Sydney, Australia, and the first two tests were not supported and only partial support was found for the third pr...","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124379813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
What concerns men? Women or other men?: A critical appraisal of the evolutionary theory of sex differences in aggression 男人关心什么?女人还是其他男人?对攻击性性别差异进化理论的批判性评价
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660110049564
A. Fischer, P. R. Mosquera
{"title":"What concerns men? Women or other men?: A critical appraisal of the evolutionary theory of sex differences in aggression","authors":"A. Fischer, P. R. Mosquera","doi":"10.1080/14616660110049564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660110049564","url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically evaluates the evolutionary proposition that men's greater aggressiveness is the result of male intra-sexual competition. For this purpose we review and discuss experimental psychological and survey studies, as well as sociological and cultural anthropological work on gender differences in anger and aggression. The reviewed studies do not support the idea that men's concern for women, reflected in the salience of intra-sexual competition, is the major cause for male's supremacy in violence. On the contrary, we argue that the fear of losing status and respect in the eyes of fellow men is the major concern that evokes male anger and aggression. The implications of our argument for the evolutionary theory are discussed.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127921808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
'I'm in and you're out . . . ' “我加入，你退出……”
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660050082906
L. Owens, R. Shute, P. Slee
{"title":"'I'm in and you're out . . . '","authors":"L. Owens, R. Shute, P. Slee","doi":"10.1080/14616660050082906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660050082906","url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a qualitative investigation of explanations for teenage girls' indirect aggression (e.g., spreading false rumours, excluding peers from the group) which is part of a larger study on the nature of teenage girls' indirect aggression. Focus groups were conducted with fifty-four 15-16-year-old girls. These focus group data were supplemented with interviews with six pairs of girls and a focus group discussion with a pilot group of eight 16-year-olds and separate individual interviews with ten key teachers. The overall aim of this part of the study was to explore why girls are indirectly aggressive to their peers. The key explanations proposed by the girls and their teachers were a desire to create excitement in girls' lives together with a range of friendship and group processes, centred around having close intimate relationships and belonging to the peer group. This study enriches our understanding of girls' indirect aggression and adds to earlier research conducted mainly using quantita...","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132932314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 128
A critique of evolutionary psychology 对进化心理学的批判
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/1461666031000063665
L. Gannon
{"title":"A critique of evolutionary psychology","authors":"L. Gannon","doi":"10.1080/1461666031000063665","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461666031000063665","url":null,"abstract":"Evolutionary psychology is a relatively new paradigm and an interdisciplinary one that has engendered considerable debate, conflict and controversy among scholars of various disciplines. The purpose of this paper is to examine the sources of this conflict and to articulate the contested issues. Emerging from methodological and inferential differences among the relevant disciplines is the question of whether or not falsifiability need be a prerequisite for theories to be considered ‘scientific.’ Although universal consensus may substitute for falsifiability, the assumptions underlying the evolutionary psychology paradigm are neither falsifiable nor do they command universal consensus. Assumptions addressed in this paper include the nature of natural selection, the unit of selection, sources of variation, and the structure of the evolved human brain. Furthermore, the paradigm suffers from inherent contradictions: (a) the claim by evolutionary psychologists that knowledge of ultimate causes is necessary to a...","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125627794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52
Special feature: the 'glass ceiling' 特色:“玻璃天花板”
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660050082924
P. Nicolson
{"title":"Special feature: the 'glass ceiling'","authors":"P. Nicolson","doi":"10.1080/14616660050082924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660050082924","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114569200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How shall I compare thee 我用什么来比较你呢
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/1461666031000063674
D. Schmitt
{"title":"How shall I compare thee","authors":"D. Schmitt","doi":"10.1080/1461666031000063674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461666031000063674","url":null,"abstract":"Gannon (this issue) has critiqued several features of evolutionary psychology. Gannon concluded that because the assumptions of evolutionary psychology are not falsifiable - and in her view many of them are wrong - evolutionary psychology should not be considered a truly scientific enterprise. In this article, several reasons are presented for why evolutionary psychology should be considered a science. For one, the falsifiability criterion invoked by Gannon was incorrectly applied to the paradigmatic level of science. Instead, falsifiability should be used to evaluate low-level empirical predictions, not high-level paradigms. Moreover, a mounting body of evidence supports the utility of using evolutionary theories to generate hypotheses and their accompanying falsifiable predictions concerning much of human behavior. Finally, rationale is provided for why evolutionary psychology may be considered a more valuable science than competing alternatives. For example, the paradigm of evolutionary psychology cont...","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114675820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The evolution of sex discrimination 性别歧视的演变
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/1461666021000013733
R. Hopcroft
{"title":"The evolution of sex discrimination","authors":"R. Hopcroft","doi":"10.1080/1461666021000013733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461666021000013733","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I use evolutionary psychology to develop a new theory of sex discrimination. This theory suggests that a cognitive bias toward low task-related self-esteem in young women when comparing themselves to men, and for high task-related self-esteem in men when comparing themselves to young women, may have evolved as it was in the reproductive interests of both males and females. Low task-related selfesteem vis-a-vis males may have been adaptive for young females in the evolutionary environment because it advertised both youth and future controllability , features highly attractive to prospective mates. High task-related self-esteem vis-a-vis young females may have been adaptive for males because it advertised capabilities as providers and protectors, also features attractive to mates. Both biases are predicted to end for females beyond the reproductive years. Predictions from this theory are tested and supported with data from twenty-nine countries, including the US.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126418465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
An adaptive glass ceiling 适应性玻璃天花板
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660050082942
V. Grant
{"title":"An adaptive glass ceiling","authors":"V. Grant","doi":"10.1080/14616660050082942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660050082942","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"317 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120945018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Gender differences in homework and test scores in Mathematics, Reading and Science at tenth and twelfth grade 十年级和十二年级数学、阅读和科学作业和考试成绩的性别差异
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660050200904
W. Mau, R. Lynn
{"title":"Gender differences in homework and test scores in Mathematics, Reading and Science at tenth and twelfth grade","authors":"W. Mau, R. Lynn","doi":"10.1080/14616660050200904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660050200904","url":null,"abstract":"Gender differences in maths, reading, science and the amount of homework done out of school were obtained for tenth and twelfth graders from the American National Educational Longitudinal Study. Males obtained significantly higher mean scores in maths and science, and females obtained significantly higher mean scores in reading and amount of homework. There were significant correlations between test scores and amount of homework, suggesting that amount of homework contributes to test scores.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"78 5 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133636092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97
Are men really more 'oriented' toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research 男性真的比女性更“倾向于”短期交配吗?对理论和研究的批评性评论
Psychology, Evolution & Gender Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/14616660110119331
D. Schmitt, T. Shackelford, D. Buss
{"title":"Are men really more 'oriented' toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research","authors":"D. Schmitt, T. Shackelford, D. Buss","doi":"10.1080/14616660110119331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660110119331","url":null,"abstract":"According to Sexual Strategies Theory (D.M. Buss and D.P.Schmitt 1993), both men and women possess psychological adaptations for short-term mating. However, men may possess three adaptations that make it seem as though they are generally more 'oriented' toward short-term mating than women: (1) Men possess greater desire for short-term sexual relationships than women; (2) Men prefer larger numbers of sexual partners over time than women; and (3) Men require less time before consenting to sex than women. We review a wide body of psychological theory and evidence that corroborates the presence of these adaptations in men's short-term sexual psychology. We also correct some recurring misinterpretations of Sexual Strategies Theory, such as the mistaken notion that women are designed solely for long-term mating. Finally, we document how the observed sex differences in short-term mating complement some feminist theories and refute competing evolutionary theories of human sexuality.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122175656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 170
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信