Recognition and Religion最新文献_第2页

Recognition and Religion Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429026089-6

N. Huttunen

引用次数: 0

The recognition of religion in public spaces 在公共场所对宗教的承认

Recognition and Religion Pub Date : 2019-02-28 DOI: 10.4324/9780429026089-2

S. Thompson

引用次数: 1

Theological and legal arguments for the non‑recognition and recognition of the rights of infidels in medieval sources 中世纪文献中对不承认和承认异教徒权利的神学和法律论证

Recognition and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429026089-11

V. Mäkinen

引用次数: 1

On the natural basis and ecological limits of recognition 对自然基础和生态界限的认识

Recognition and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429026089-15

Arto Laitinen, T. Kortetmäki

{"title":"On the natural basis and ecological limits of recognition","authors":"Arto Laitinen, T. Kortetmäki","doi":"10.4324/9780429026089-15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026089-15","url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, we will discuss the idea that social recognition requires natural resources, and examine its natural, ecological, or environmental aspects. We argue against a view, which would conceptualize social recognition (respect, esteem, trust etc) as conceptually and ontologically independent of its natural basis, which is captured nicely in Richard Sennett’s question “Unlike food, respect costs nothing. Why, then should it be in short supply?” We first examine the way in which recognition was materially mediated in Hegel’s dialectics of Master and Slave, and then proceed to analyze in more detail what mutual recognition is and in what sense it requires natural resources. It turns out that different forms of recognition are very deeply rooted in material redistribution, and satisfactory relations of recognition in a “society of equals” may require very radical global redistribution. We then raise the stakes by connecting recognition not only with social justice but environmental and ecological justice. We conclude by bringing up the notion of planetary limits. 1. “Unlike food, respect costs nothing. Why, then should it be in short supply?” 1.1. Sennett’s slogan vs. Hegel’s Master and Slave Richard Sennett has asked: “Unlike food, respect costs nothing. Why, then should it be in short supply?”. The question is important as such, as there certainly are mechanisms that prevent us from giving each other due recognition when we could materially or economically afford it.1 There may be psychological and existential “costs” such as having to admit one’s own vulnerability and dependence, and there may be human tendencies not to make any such admissions. We will not focus on such “costs” here. The idea that “respect costs nothing” expresses a view that social recognition (respect, esteem, trust etc) is conceptually and ontologically independent of its natural or material basis. It is a rather disembodied, unencumbered view of recognition, and we wish to contest it here. Hegel’s famous dialectic of the master and the slave communicates a vivid image of the material basis of recognition: in a struggle of life and death, it comes apparent that a dead person cannot give recognition.2 Mutual recognition costs at least as much as keeping someone alive. Of course, if the other already has plenty of resources, it may not cost in practice anything for me to form a relationship of mutual recognition – which creates the image that it costs nothing. Hegel further notes that the relationship between the master and the slave is materially mediated: the master holds the slave in chains, and the slave works on the material environment for the master.3 There are theories of recognition that have insightfully stressed this natural and embodied basis of recognition, drawing on Hegel (Deranty 2009, Testa 2009). Let us approach this in two steps: by asking what recognition is (1.2, 1.3), and then by asking what direct and indirect ways 1 See e.g. Ikäheimo, 2014. 2 Heg","PeriodicalId":269601,"journal":{"name":"Recognition and Religion","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129534111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Spinoza, religion, and recognition 斯宾诺莎，宗教，和承认

Recognition and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429026089-13

Ericka L Tucker

引用次数: 2