发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
BOOK REVIEW: DAVID GIBSON AND JONATHAN GIBSON, EDS. FROM HEAVEN HE CAME AND SOUGHT HER: DEFINITE ATONEMENT IN HISTORICAL, BIBLICAL, THEOLOGICAL, AND PASTORAL PERSPECTIVE 书评:大卫·吉布森和乔纳森·吉布森编。他从天上来找她:从历史、圣经、神学和教牧的角度来看，这是明确的赎罪
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV5
Thomas Haviland-Pabst
{"title":"BOOK REVIEW: DAVID GIBSON AND JONATHAN GIBSON, EDS. FROM HEAVEN HE CAME AND SOUGHT HER: DEFINITE ATONEMENT IN HISTORICAL, BIBLICAL, THEOLOGICAL, AND PASTORAL PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Thomas Haviland-Pabst","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127578474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
INTERVIEW WITH PETER OPITZ Peter opitz采访
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.INT
Peter A. Lillback
{"title":"INTERVIEW WITH PETER OPITZ","authors":"Peter A. Lillback","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.INT","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.INT","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130948852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE DOCUMENTS OF THE SYNOD OF DORT (1618–1619)—A NEW EDITION 波特主教会议文件(1618-1619)-新版本
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART10
D. Sinnema
{"title":"THE DOCUMENTS OF THE SYNOD OF DORT (1618–1619)—A NEW EDITION","authors":"D. Sinnema","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART10","url":null,"abstract":"A new project is underway to produce a ten-volume critical edition of all the documents of the Synod of Dort in their original languages (Latin [eighty percent of them], Dutch, German, English, and French) as close as possible to the anniversary years 2018 and 2019. It is published by Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Göttingen) and includes documents already published and those available only in manuscript. In contrast to the originally published Acta, the new edition contains the documents produced by the synod and its delegates and fully incorporates all the Remonstrant documents.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121356286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BOOK REVIEW: JONATHAN WILLIS. THE REFORMATION OF THE DECALOGUE: RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN ENGLAND, C. 1485–1625 书评:乔纳森·威利斯。十诫的改革:宗教认同和十诫在英国，约1485年至1625年
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV3
H. Perkins
{"title":"BOOK REVIEW: JONATHAN WILLIS. THE REFORMATION OF THE DECALOGUE: RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN ENGLAND, C. 1485–1625","authors":"H. Perkins","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.REV3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122913827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE THEOLOGY OF THE CANONS OF DORT: A REASSESSMENT AFTER FOUR HUNDRED YEARS 波特正典的神学:四百年后的重新评估
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART7
A. Huijgen
{"title":"THE THEOLOGY OF THE CANONS OF DORT: A REASSESSMENT AFTER FOUR HUNDRED YEARS","authors":"A. Huijgen","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART7","url":null,"abstract":"This article reassesses the value of the Canons of Dort, drafted at the Synod of Dort (1618–19). A picture with diverse shades emerges. After four hundred years, the Canons of Dort stand out when compared to the Remonstrant position for their pastoral tone, Reformed catholicity, emphasis on the efficacity of divine grace, an infralapsarian stance on the decrees of God, and their biblical character. In retrospect, however, the Canons also show theological limitations such as allowing the dominance of the Arminian agenda, the potentially problematic nature of complex, causal logic, the deficiency of certain important biblical notions, and a deficiency as to the centrality of Christ. Christ as the mirror of election in particular deserves a more central place in the doctrine of election.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125362572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ABUNDANT SUFFICIENCY AND INTENTIONAL EFFICACY: PARTICULAR REDEMPTION AT THE SYNOD OF DORT 充足的充分性和有意的功效:特别的救赎
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART9
Lee Gatiss
{"title":"ABUNDANT SUFFICIENCY AND INTENTIONAL EFFICACY: PARTICULAR REDEMPTION AT THE SYNOD OF DORT","authors":"Lee Gatiss","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART9","url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at the background to the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) and examines the debate there on the issue of particular redemption or definite atonement, with a specific focus on the use of the classic distinction between sufficiency and efficacy made famous by Peter Lombard’s Sentences. It also looks at the variety of Reformed responses to the Remonstrants, including those on the death of Christ that might be categorized as hypothetical universalist. It calls into question the usefulness of the terminology of “four-point Calvinists” to describe delegates such as John Davenant.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123170613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
UNIO CUM CHRISTO AND REFORMED COMPLEMENTARITY
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART5
N. Brand
{"title":"UNIO CUM CHRISTO AND REFORMED COMPLEMENTARITY","authors":"N. Brand","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART5","url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the reticence of the Reformed community toward spirituality, which is devastating in light of our chief end “to glorify God and enjoy him forever” (Westminster Shorter Catechism 1). Reformed spirituality, seemingly short of a lively biblical contemporary expression, needs to be rekindled in a way consistent with its heritage. An increased complementarian practice among the Reformed will assist in such a spiritual reanimation, in the form of a corporate Reformed spirituality founded upon union with Christ. An initial trace of a feminine enjoyment of union with Christ demonstrates this proposal, and, in the spirit of semper reformanda, a discussion of areas for an improved complementarity in the pastoral care and employment of women and of the absence of Reformed female scholars follows.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"167 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116271277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BOOK REVIEW: JAMES P. EGLINTON, ED. AND TRANS. HERMAN BAVINCK ON PREACHING AND PREACHERS 书评:詹姆斯·p·埃格林顿，编辑和翻译。赫尔曼·巴文克关于讲道和传道人
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.rev6
Sinclair B. Ferguson
{"title":"BOOK REVIEW: JAMES P. EGLINTON, ED. AND TRANS. HERMAN BAVINCK ON PREACHING AND PREACHERS","authors":"Sinclair B. Ferguson","doi":"10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.rev6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.rev6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129911686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TRANSGENDER: TRANS-ITION TO NOWHERE 跨性别者:无处可去
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART2
Peter Jones
{"title":"TRANSGENDER: TRANS-ITION TO NOWHERE","authors":"Peter Jones","doi":"10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/UCC4.2.2018.ART2","url":null,"abstract":"Based on Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (ESV), the apostle Paul in Romans 1:25 gives an amazingly com- plete definition of the only two ways of existing in the world: “they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.” I call these two ways of existing Oneism and Twoism.\u0000In Oneism, if you worship creation, you will believe that the world is self-created, self-explanatory, and all made of the same stuff (matter, spirit, or a mixture). Paganism is the worship of nature. If everything shares the same divine substance, then all distinctions are eliminated and everything is god. In Twoism, if you worship God, you will believe that he is the Creator—an external, intelligent, personal God. There are two kinds of existence—the Creator who is uncreated, and everything else, which is created. He has placed distinctions in his creation, making what I call Twoism a worldview based on the binaries of otherness and difference.\u0000From living under the cultural canopy of biblical truth, our world has changed in the last one or two generations. This becomes especially evident in the modern views of sexuality—in particular, transsexuality, where human beings now self-define and reject the creational binary of male/female sexuality.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115559948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE PERENNITY OF ANSELM’S PROSLOGION 安瑟姆的长篇大论
CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11
Y. Imbert
{"title":"THE PERENNITY OF ANSELM’S PROSLOGION","authors":"Y. Imbert","doi":"10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11","url":null,"abstract":"The first goal of Anselm in the Proslogion is to encourage believers by demonstrating the absolute necessity of the existence of the God of the Bible. Anselm most likely succeeds as the definition of God that he adopts is faithful to the content of special revelation. Whether the argument can function as an argument for the existence of God can be doubted. In this article we look at the various aspects of the question.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"354 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132554391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信