{"title":"安瑟姆的长篇大论","authors":"Y. Imbert","doi":"10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first goal of Anselm in the Proslogion is to encourage believers by demonstrating the absolute necessity of the existence of the God of the Bible. Anselm most likely succeeds as the definition of God that he adopts is faithful to the content of special revelation. Whether the argument can function as an argument for the existence of God can be doubted. In this article we look at the various aspects of the question.","PeriodicalId":269329,"journal":{"name":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","volume":"354 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PERENNITY OF ANSELM’S PROSLOGION\",\"authors\":\"Y. Imbert\",\"doi\":\"10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first goal of Anselm in the Proslogion is to encourage believers by demonstrating the absolute necessity of the existence of the God of the Bible. Anselm most likely succeeds as the definition of God that he adopts is faithful to the content of special revelation. Whether the argument can function as an argument for the existence of God can be doubted. In this article we look at the various aspects of the question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE\",\"volume\":\"354 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CURRENT DEBATES IN REFORMED THEOLOGY: PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35285/ucc4.2.2018.art11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The first goal of Anselm in the Proslogion is to encourage believers by demonstrating the absolute necessity of the existence of the God of the Bible. Anselm most likely succeeds as the definition of God that he adopts is faithful to the content of special revelation. Whether the argument can function as an argument for the existence of God can be doubted. In this article we look at the various aspects of the question.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
