2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)最新文献_第2页

Safe product design, forensic engineering, and Asimov's Laws of Robotics 安全产品设计，法医工程，以及阿西莫夫机器人定律

2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE) Pub Date : 2014-05-05 DOI: 10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6841995

L. F. Bilancia

{"title":"Safe product design, forensic engineering, and Asimov's Laws of Robotics","authors":"L. F. Bilancia","doi":"10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6841995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6841995","url":null,"abstract":"Isaac Asimov wrote a series of science fiction stories regarding failure analysis of complex systems: his fictional positronic brained robots. The stories revolved around his “Three Laws of Robotics”. One, a robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction allow a human being to come to harm. Two, a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. Three, a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. We are surrounded by automated systems that routinely violate these Three Laws, yet some systems, such as implanted pacemakers and defibrillators have specific and distinct circuitry and firmware that implement exactly these rules. Furthermore, as engineers we are called upon to evaluate systems that have failed, determine root cause, and assist the courts in determining culpability. This paper presents a series of examples of systems that are well implemented examples of Asimov's Three Laws, of systems that categorically fail to implement the Three Laws, tie the Three Laws into the Criticality and Severity Analysis (FMEA/CA/SA) Failure Modes and Effects Analysis standards, and examine the use of The Laws in forensic engineering and failure analysis.","PeriodicalId":262617,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128891445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Hazard based safety engineering in relation to injury epidemiology and etiology 基于危害的安全工程与伤害流行病学和病因学的关系

2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE) Pub Date : 2014-05-05 DOI: 10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6841999

T. Lanzisero

引用次数: 0

Residential solar and electric vehicle bonding and grounding methods for galvanic compatibility 住宅太阳能和电动汽车的电兼容性的粘接和接地方法

2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE) Pub Date : 2014-05-05 DOI: 10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6842001

D. Moongilan

{"title":"Residential solar and electric vehicle bonding and grounding methods for galvanic compatibility","authors":"D. Moongilan","doi":"10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6842001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6842001","url":null,"abstract":"Residential Photovoltaic (PV) panels are typically roof-top mounted and their accompanying DC/AC inverters are either collocated or installed inside the building. The PV panels and associated DC/AC inverter metal enclosures must be interconnected and grounded to a grounding-electrode according to NEC690.41-64. A small potential difference exists between the enclosure and its interconnection to the ground. The potential differences between a PV system enclosure and its ground wire, as well as, the potential differences between the inverter enclosure and its ground wire are at opposite polarities. Likewise, an Electric Vehicle (EV) controller enclosure and its ground interconnection, and a battery and its ground interconnection are also at opposite polarities. This observation can be generalized to any collocated generator and load DC power system. Since the interconnection potential difference and galvanic voltage are either at opposite or same polarities, the traditional galvanic compatibility rules can't be applied to the generator and load enclosures, where one side of the DC supply circuit is intentionally connected to earth ground at the source and load enclosures. This is because significantly less corrosive damage occurs under conditions of opposite polarity versus conditions of like (same) polarity. This article discusses galvanic compatibility issues of PV panels and EV groundings while providing a solution for this challenge using electrochemistry and electric circuit theory.","PeriodicalId":262617,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127619442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Equipotentiality and grounding Derivation of grounding resistance for equipment 设备接地电阻的等电位和接地推导

2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE) Pub Date : 2014-05-01 DOI: 10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6842003

R. Nute

引用次数: 1

Why 500VA for hipot testers? A TC66 investigation to explore the necessity of the 500VA hipot tester 为什么要给hipot测试者500VA ?一项TC66调查，探讨500VA高温测试仪的必要性

2014 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE) Pub Date : 2014-05-01 DOI: 10.1109/ISPCE.2014.6841998

Nicholas Piotrowski

引用次数: 0