English & Commonwealth Law eJournal最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Rule of Law and the Rule of Empire: A.V. Dicey in Imperial Context 法治与帝国统治:帝国语境中的A.V.戴西
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-08-31 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12363
Dylan Lino
{"title":"The Rule of Law and the Rule of Empire: A.V. Dicey in Imperial Context","authors":"Dylan Lino","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12363","url":null,"abstract":"The idea of the rule of law, more ubiquitous globally today than ever before, owes a lasting debt to the work ofVictorian legal theorist A. V Dicey. But for all of Dicey’s influence, little attention has been paid to the imperial entanglements of his thought, including on the rule of law. This article seeks to bring the imperial dimensions of Dicey’s thinking about the rule of law into view. On Dicey’s account, the rule of law represented a distinctive English civilisational achievement, one that furnished a liberal justification for British imperialism. And yet Dicey was forced to acknowledge that imperial rule at times required arbitrariness and formal inequality at odds with the rule of law. At a moment when the rule of law has once more come to license all sorts of transnational interventions by globally powerful political actors, Dicey’s preoccupations and ambivalences are in many ways our own.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121936623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
The Ultimate Creation Story: The Confidential Informant as a Creation of Law 终极创造故事:作为法律创造的秘密线人
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-08-24 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3238229
Lisa A. Silver
{"title":"The Ultimate Creation Story: The Confidential Informant as a Creation of Law","authors":"Lisa A. Silver","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3238229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3238229","url":null,"abstract":"Our laws have the power to create. Yet, not all it creates is welcome or desired. This article is about the creation of confidential informant or CI status through the strict application of the law of informer privilege. It is also a creation story of how a person, who is also an accused person, unwillingly became a CI, and with that designation became a non-entity in the eyes of the law. With that status the person, Named Person A, faces barriers. As an accused person, Named Person A’s lawyer is not within the circle of privilege and cannot access information which may identify Named Person A as a CI. The only other prospect is to pierce the privilege by fitting within one narrow exception, appropriated from solicitor-client privilege, known as “innocence at stake.” This confined exception provides little relief for the CI-accused and has the broader effect of limiting access to CI information where the accused is not a CI but is already privy to CI information. Although the courts, as recently as the Supreme Court decision of R v Brassington, have stayed firm on this ‘ancient and hallowed’ form of privilege, Named Person A’s story highlights the need to revisit this legal construction. This article takes the reader through the labyrinth of informer privilege to find a more flexible, modern and principled approach to the creation of this kind of legal status. It is in this ultimate creation story of Named Person A, we come to understand the need for a re-write in the law of informer privilege.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130937906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Revocability of Instruments of Withdrawal from Mulitlateral Treaties with Particular Emphasis on the United Kingdom's Article 50 TEU Notification 多边条约退出文书的可撤销性,特别强调联合王国第50条TEU通知
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-08-23 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3238431
P. Eden
{"title":"The Revocability of Instruments of Withdrawal from Mulitlateral Treaties with Particular Emphasis on the United Kingdom's Article 50 TEU Notification","authors":"P. Eden","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3238431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3238431","url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers whether the United Kingdom’s notification under Article 50 TEU on 29 March 2017 can be unilaterally revoked. The article also considers the right of states to revoke of unilateral notifications of withdrawal from multilateral treaties more generally due to the fact that the United Kingdom’s right to withdraw its Article 50 TEU notification is (at least in part) dependent on an applicable right of withdrawal in customary international law. \u0000The paper addresses the applicability of Article 68 the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties (VCLT) to the Article 50 TEU unilateral revocation debate paying particular attention to the drafting history of the article as well as the arguments for and against the customary status of any right of unilateral revocation of instruments of withdrawal from multilateral treaties. The article also examines whether Article 50 TEU, by express words or necessary implication, excludes the operation of any alleged customary right to unilaterally revoke an instrument of withdrawal before it takes effect.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115071883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Centralisation of Procurement and Supply Chain Management in the English NHS: Some Governance and Compliance Challenges 英国NHS采购和供应链管理的集中化:一些治理和合规挑战
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-08-09 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3232804
A. Sanchez-Graells
{"title":"Centralisation of Procurement and Supply Chain Management in the English NHS: Some Governance and Compliance Challenges","authors":"A. Sanchez-Graells","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3232804","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3232804","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a critical analysis of the new operating model for NHS procurement that is being implemented in 2018/2019 (the NOM). The government expects NOM to generate significant savings through centralised procurement and strategic supply chain management, which would then be dedicated to frontline NHS healthcare services through newly devised ‘sustainability and transformation plans’ (STPs). The paper stresses that the NOM rests on a complex network of contracts resulting in a layer of contractualised governance that obscures its architecture and decision-making processes. It maps the changes that the NOM introduces in the operation and governance of the NHS supply chain and identifies key challenges in ensuring that the NOM is subjected to adequate oversight and accountability mechanisms, in particular from the perspective of public procurement and competition law. The paper advocates for the location of all NOM relationships on the NHS Business Services Authority, especially to facilitate judicial review.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125927871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Law and (Some) Finance of Related Party Transactions: An Introduction 关联交易的法律与(部分)财务:导论
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-07-15 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3214101
L. Enriques, Tobias H. Troeger
{"title":"The Law and (Some) Finance of Related Party Transactions: An Introduction","authors":"L. Enriques, Tobias H. Troeger","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3214101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3214101","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the introductory chapter of Luca Enriques and Tobias Troger (eds.), The Law and Finance of Related Party Transactions (Cambridge University Press: forthcoming). Its goal is to sketch out the individual chapters’ contributions to the scholarly and policy debates on the adequate regulation of related party transactions (RPTs). For that purpose, we scope the issue by highlighting the principal costs and benefits of shareholder control, which allows both the implementation of entrepreneurial vision and various forms of rent-seeking. We next proceed by putting the challenges of regulating RPTs into the broader context of conflicts of interest and tunneling techniques. Against this background, we then turn to the main regulatory options available for legislators (independent/disinterested director approval, majority of the minority approval, ex post fairness review, and involvement of supervisory agencies), highlighting some of the key insights on each of them from individual chapters. Finally, we show how the chapters in the book can also inform European legislators who are currently in the process of implementing the revised Shareholder Rights Directive rules on RPTs.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127077201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
How to Resolve Disputes Arising from Brexit: Comparing International Models 如何解决英国脱欧引发的纠纷:比较国际模式
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-06-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3193892
J. Odermatt
{"title":"How to Resolve Disputes Arising from Brexit: Comparing International Models","authors":"J. Odermatt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3193892","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3193892","url":null,"abstract":"The question of how disputes arising from Brexit are to be resolved, and by which body, is one of the most sensitive issues in the negotiations on the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union and the envisaged future relationship between the UK and the EU. The legal issues related to withdrawal are further magnified in complexity due to the nature of the EU itself, which does not neatly fit into the category of a traditional international organization. The UK has repeatedly stated that it will not accept the continued role of the EU Court of Justice in the UK legal system after withdrawal. Any dispute settlement system must also respect the constitutional requirements of the EU legal order, most notably, by not infringing on the autonomy of EU law. This paper discusses some of the various models from international dispute settlement that could be used to inspire a dispute settlement system in the Brexit context. It discusses dispute settlement in the withdrawal agreement and the role of the Court of Justice during and after a transition period. It then discusses the challenges of designing a dispute settlement system for the future relationship agreement. While aspects of these various models could be replicated, there is no dispute settlement system that is fully appropriate to deal with the various complexities and challenges of Brexit. The paper discusses the possibility of setting up a standing international tribunal to resolve disputes arising from Brexit.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"1660 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129329390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
What's Offered in an ICO? Digital Coins as Things ICO提供了什么?作为物品的数字货币
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-03-14 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3140499
J. Allen
{"title":"What's Offered in an ICO? Digital Coins as Things","authors":"J. Allen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3140499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140499","url":null,"abstract":"Digital tokens — variously intended to function as currency, as securities, or as vouchers for deferred goods and services — have burst into the mainstream over the past 12 months in high-worth ‘Initial Coin Offerings’ (‘ICOs’). Prior to the important questions of legal characterization that digital tokens raise as ‘money’ or ‘securities’ for the purposes of prudential, capital markets, tax, or other regulations, we must establish how the law takes cognizance of a digital token at all. In this article I argue that no legal system deals adequately with immaterial objects, which include digital tokens but also more traditional money and securities; establishing a satisfactory legal category for immaterial objects as objects of property law is therefore a necessary first step. Using the English law of money as an entry point into this complex of questions, I explore the ontology of digital immaterial objects and set out the conceptual basis for a new category of property. I argue that such a category is long overdue and will be increasingly important in the future.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130037550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Independent Directors in Asia: Theoretical Lessons and Practical Implications 亚洲独立董事:理论教训与实践启示
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/9781316819180.014
S. Kozuka, L. Nottage
{"title":"Independent Directors in Asia: Theoretical Lessons and Practical Implications","authors":"S. Kozuka, L. Nottage","doi":"10.1017/9781316819180.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819180.014","url":null,"abstract":"Independent director requirements have spread throughout Asia, generating diverse definitions, enforcement patterns and cadres of directors (Part I). Yet the proliferation itself, and some of its features, provide some support for convergence in corporate governance, especially in function rather than form. In particular, seemingly influenced by proposals from Australian reformers in the early 1990s, the definition of independence has departed from US and early UK roots by excluding (variously defined) substantial shareholders, except until recently Singapore. This fits with the historical reality of “blockholders” in Austral-Asian corporate governance, making a key corporate governance concern the tension between large and minority shareholders, rather than the traditional Anglo-American tension between dispersed shareholders and professional managers. Given the looser definition in Singapore, the function of independent directors there has extended to mediating disputes among family blockholders. This may also be found in India, for example, where enforcement has been problematic until recently (Part II). \u0000The comparative analysis further suggests that significant “legal transplants” are occurring, but with complex features and motivations (Part III). We find elements of Miller’s cost-saving transplants (as perhaps in Hong Kong), entrepreneurial transplants (recently in Japan), legitimacy-enhancing transplants (Singapore) or even sometimes externally-dictated transplants (Korea, after the Asian Financial Crisis). We also see elements of Frankenberg’s “IKEA” theory of legal transplants, whereby concepts are de-contextualised and stored in a global intellectual reservoir, and then taken out and reassembled – for better or worse – by the importing jurisdiction (Part III). Given these patterns, independent directors will probably continue to be the norm in Asian countries, notwithstanding growing academic critiques. It is also likely that the varieties of independent directors found among jurisdictions will not diminish significantly (Part IV).","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"60 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133391458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Regulating Complex Contracting: A Socio‐Legal Study of Decision‐Making Under EU and UK Law 规范复杂合同:欧盟和英国法律下决策的社会法研究
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12326
Eleanor Aspey, R. Craven
{"title":"Regulating Complex Contracting: A Socio‐Legal Study of Decision‐Making Under EU and UK Law","authors":"Eleanor Aspey, R. Craven","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12326","url":null,"abstract":"The article evaluates interview data on decision‐making under public procurement law using Halliday's analytical model on compliance with administrative law. In this study, unlike other studies on administrative compliance, the decisions faced by public bodies are not routine; they relate to the award of complex, high‐value contracts. Two contrasting decisions in the procurement process are discussed: the decision over the choice of procedure at the outset of the process, and the decision over the extent to which the public body should negotiate with the winning bidder towards the end of the process. The article considers the rationales behind decisions, and finds that, although public bodies are generally predisposed to comply, legal uncertainty means the relevance of commercial pressures and challenge risk impact heavily on approaches to compliance, even shaping understanding of what compliant behaviour actually is.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"33 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131018489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Crowdfunding and Public Interest Judicial Review: A Risky New Resource for Law Reform 众筹与公益司法审查:法律改革的风险新资源
English & Commonwealth Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-01-21 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3106355
Joe Tomlinson
{"title":"Crowdfunding and Public Interest Judicial Review: A Risky New Resource for Law Reform","authors":"Joe Tomlinson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3106355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3106355","url":null,"abstract":"In their influential work, Harlow and Rawlings defined “pressure through law” as the “use of the law and legal techniques as an instrument for obtaining wider collective objectives.” They observed that the use of the courts by civil society organisations seeking reform was not just an American trend and nor was it new. In recent years, there has been a growing literature which has shown how some civil society organisations deployed the law and legal techniques to pursue wider reform objective. Much of the debate around this “mobilisation of law” considers why groups turn to the courts and why they do not. A common thread in this literature is how the availability of financial resources often determines the fate of public interest litigation. \u0000In the context of judicial review in the UK, resources have become an increasingly tricky issue. The relationship between money and access to judicial review is a densely complex one, but many now claim that funding a judicial review is increasingly difficult. In this article, I explore whether crowdfunding—using an online platform to raise third party funding for a judicial review—is a possible answer to the issue of lack of resources in the context of public interest litigation. In other words, can crowdfunding support legal reform through the provision of resources for public interest litigation? I argue that crowdfunding can—in certain cases—solve the resource dilemma and be key in procuring reform via public interest litigation. However, it is far from a foolproof solution and there are multiple risks inherent in its use. The nature and extent of such risks are such that the crowdfunding of public interest litigation should be approached with great caution. In this respect, there is a role for civil society organisations that have engaged in public interest litigation to advocate for sensible and cautious use of crowdfunding methods.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"267 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116049756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信