{"title":"importancia de la abducción en la etapa de investigación criminal","authors":"L. Moscatelli","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22846","url":null,"abstract":"El artículo tiene como objetivo mostrar la relevancia de las discusiones sobre la abducción, que juega un papel central en el razonamiento probatorio existente en las primeras etapas de la investigación de un delito. A partir de la explicación de la estructura abductiva, se tomará como ejemplo un caso de investigación criminal ocurrido en Brasil, en el que la toma de decisiones por la policía fue precipitada y sesgada, dando lugar a la condena de un inocente. Tomando lo anterior como base, se presentarán algunas herramientas de inteligencia artificial existentes y otras propuestas de políticas públicas que pueden ser implementadas para formar a los responsables de la investigación criminal en la generación de mejores hipotesis de trabajo.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121252049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fundamentos à admissibilidade da metaprova no processo penal","authors":"Daniel DE RESENDE SALGADO","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22908","url":null,"abstract":"O presente artigo parte da premissa de que a metaprova objetiva reforçar ou debilitar a força inferencial de uma determinada prova, influenciando seu nível de fiabilidade. O caráter subsidiário e periférico da metaprova indica que a sua relevância deriva da relevância da prova, particularidade que influi na análise de sua admissão no curso do procedimento probatório","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126140198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Accuracy and fairness – Siamese twins?","authors":"Thomas Weigend","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22844","url":null,"abstract":"The author agrees with Sarah Summers’ view that a criminal judgment in a system of fair justice should be substantively accurate and at the same time should be the result of a fair process. The author argues, however, for keeping these two requirements apart because they are linked to different goals and may in individual cases conflict with each other.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128234133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"arrepentido: entre prueba y error","authors":"A. Richter","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22892","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22892","url":null,"abstract":"En los últimos años, la figura del arrepentido ha recibido un mayor interés, que también se refleja en su inclusión –de manera explícita o implícita– en diferentes ordenamientos jurídicos. Junto con ello aumentaron las discusiones alrededor de esta nueva herramienta de investigación de delitos y una de las preguntas más recurrentes versa sobre si y cómo se puede justificar la implementación de la delación premiada en nuestros ordenamientos jurídicos. En especial, me interesan dos cosas. Por un lado, intentaré ordenar y agrupar o sistematizar las diferentes posturas de aceptación o rechazo de la figura y por el otro lado buscaré formas para evaluar la aceptabilidad de sus argumentos. Espero que estas observaciones tentativas tengan utilidad para un problema recurrente en el análisis de los procedimientos y la prueba: el riesgo de aceptar o no ciertos errores y su vinculación con los estándares de prueba.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133934254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Truth, Proof, Rights and the Rule of Law in Criminal Adjudication","authors":"J. Jackson","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22838","url":null,"abstract":"A comment on S. J. Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights»","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116666618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What’s so Special about the Criminal Trial?","authors":"R. Duff","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22823","url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers some further support to Sarah Summers’ argument, in «The Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof, and Rights», that we cannot separate process from outcome in the criminal trial—that the justification and legitimacy of the verdict (especially of a conviction) depends crucially on the procedure through which it was reached. Intuitive support for this view is found by considering the case of a guilty person who is convicted after a trial that denied him the opportunity or means for «effective participation»; further support is found in the provisions made for those who are «unfit to plead», those who lack the capacities necessary for effective participation in their trial. A firmer grounding for this view is then found in a theory of the criminal trial as a process through which alleged public wrongdoers are called to account—a process in which they should be active participants.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126421442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Could Robot Judges Believe? Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial as we approach the Digital Age","authors":"Sabine Gless","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22849","url":null,"abstract":"Criminal proof is unique, in that it must be able to account for the justification of both: accurate fact-finding and a fair trial. This is Sarah Summers’ main message in her article on the epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial, which focusses on belief as a sort of proxy for societal acceptance of truth as a set of facts established by compliance to procedural rules. This commentary tests her finding by scrutinizing whether it is conceivable that robots, complying to all rules, assist in fact-finding with a specific form of legal belief based on a sophisticated probability weighting opaque to humans. The result is in accordance with Sarah Summers: as long as robots cannot explain their beliefs, any criminal proof based on them flounders as it can neither be part of a fair trial nor ensure acceptance in the existing institutional framework.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132589823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Explorando el razonamiento probatorio en Chile: un estudio preliminar de las intuiciones judiciales sobre el daño","authors":"Jonatan Valenzuela Saldías","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22790","url":null,"abstract":"El artículo presenta una aproximación al derecho probatorio en el campo del derecho de daños, a partir de los resultados de un trabajo empírico sobre intuiciones judiciales y de abogados respecto de la prueba del daño en la práctica judicial chilena. Se expone un estudio exploratorio en el que se aprecian concepciones vinculadas a la prueba del daño desde el punto de vista de los valores asociados a la decisión judicial, a los medios de prueba y a la regla de estándar de prueba que se estima aplicable en dicho campo.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115766185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intime conviction’ in Germany: Conceptual Foundations, Historical Development and Current Meaning","authors":"K. Ambos","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22839","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132473138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La identidad de género como objeto de prueba. Algunas reflexiones a propósito del caso SUP-JDC-304/2018 y acumulados","authors":"Marianela Delgado Nieves","doi":"10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22868","url":null,"abstract":"La cuestión relativa a la identidad de género, en especial en aquellos casos en que difiere del sexo que le fue asignado a una persona al nacer, ha supuesto importantes debates en distintos campos. Uno de ellos es precisamente el del proceso judicial. Este texto tiene por objeto analizar el criterio adoptado por la Sala Superior del Tribunal Electoral de Poder Judicial de la Federación de limitar el objetivo de búsqueda de la verdad, en aras de proteger un conjunto de derechos fundamentales, en aquellos casos en que se controvierte la identidad de género de una persona. Sobre el particular, sostendré, por un lado, que no está justificado el sacrificio de tal objetivo, al menos a la luz de las consideraciones del tribunal y, por otro, que, incluso admitiendo que lo está, dicho criterio enfrenta importantes problemas en materia de prueba que hacen dudar sobre la necesidad de buscar una alternativa distinta.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"8 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126071998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}