Rodrigo Zaldívar Del Águila, Valeria Betzabeth Duffóo Sánchez
{"title":"Dos siglos sin ti: La falta de un verdadero catastro en el Perú y sus consecuencias","authors":"Rodrigo Zaldívar Del Águila, Valeria Betzabeth Duffóo Sánchez","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1637","url":null,"abstract":"Poco se habla sobre la falta de un - verdadero - catastro predial en el Perú, aunque mucho se habla sobre la gran cantidad de problemas que tiene el país en parte causado por su ausencia: retrasos en proyectos de infraestructura, superposiciones registrales, falta de planeamiento territorial, baja recaudación tributaria municipal, entre otros. Este artículo pretende poner de relieve la situación catastral del país, a dos centenas de su independencia, y ofrecer recomendaciones para poder contar con un verdadero catastro de predios.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131469434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Propuestas para una agenda en materia de derechos de propiedad rumbo al Bicentenario","authors":"Raúl Ravina","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1634","url":null,"abstract":"El presente trabajo tiene como finalidad transmitir la importancia de la regulación de los derechos de propiedad en el Perú en los diferentes tipos de actividades por parte de personas naturales y jurídicas para el desarrollo de sus proyectos. En ese sentido, el lector podrá apreciar las principales críticas y oportunidades de mejora respecto a la regulación actual en nuestro país para lo cual se intentará detallar de forma didáctica y breve el “diagnóstico” de las principales instituciones para garantizar el acceso a los predios y cuál debiera ser su correcta interpretación en beneficio de la sociedad en general.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125682867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La tutela procesal penal de altos dignatarios por la comisión de delitos comunes: De la inmunidad parlamentaria al fuero privilegiado","authors":"Daniel O. Huamán Castellares","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V10I14.1635","url":null,"abstract":"El presente artículo analiza la legitimidad de las prerrogativas procesales- penales de los altos dignatarios del estado peruano para determinar la pertinencia de una reforma en dicho ámbito. De forma particular, se desarolla el concepto de inmunidad parlamentaria, junto a su reciente sustitución por el sistema de fuero privilegiado.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134456138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Armonizando tensiones: La necesidad de transparencia en el arbitraje sin destruir la confidencialidad","authors":"Nicolás Serván Eyzaguirre","doi":"10.21678/forseti.v8i12.1354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v8i12.1354","url":null,"abstract":"In the present article, the author analyses the classic paradigm of confidentiality in commercial arbitration and the regulations of the main arbitral institutions in the world. Then goes deeper into the need for transparency in arbitration. Finally, he puts forward a series of proposals that should be put into practice to develop transparency without neglecting confidentiality.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116923345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crónica de una muerte anunciada: La conveniencia de la arbitrabilidad de las patentes y marcas en el Perú","authors":"Silvia Silva Paredes, Adriana Ascue","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1100","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with some of the challenges of industrial property arbitration. The analysis focuses specifically on the arbitrability of disputes arising from the grant of trademark and patent rights. Based on a review of comparative experiences that have admitted the arbitrability of these rights and the different arbitrability criterias, the authors examine whether it is convenient to arbitrate these matters in the Peruvian context.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126084773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"¿Escuchando mercaderes o escuchando abogados? La regla sobre producción de documentos en el arbitraje comercial","authors":"H. Ezcurra, Eduardo Iñiguez","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1099","url":null,"abstract":"The authors express their concern for the way in which lawyers areestablishing arbitration’s rules by choosing as its main rule the full disclosure ofdocuments. Their approach consists in switching the criteria and adopting a detailed disclosure of documents instead as a way of making arbitration a more efficient mechanism and therefore more suitable for the clients, also known as “business men”.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126972284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fernando Cantuarias Salaverry, Nicolás Serván Eyzaguirre
{"title":"¿Arbitraje Procesal Civil? La necesidad de implantar buenas prácticas en el arbitraje","authors":"Fernando Cantuarias Salaverry, Nicolás Serván Eyzaguirre","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1097","url":null,"abstract":"The authors, concerned about the inclusion of procedural rules of the civil process in the arbitration field, discuss the best international practices for the organization of an arbitration, ranging the presentation of written memorials, passing through the evidentiary stage and the disclosure of documents, and the implementation of technology in arbitration.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121630929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mezclando manzanas con naranjas o cómo reconvenir violaciones de derechos humanos en arbitrajes de inversión","authors":"Uber López Montreuil, Adriana García, Eduardo Dibos Figueroa","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes potential counterclaims of a State in an investment arbitration. Thus, the authors make a general revision of the fundamental concepts of investment arbitration focus in ICSID proceedings. On that basis, they verify thepossibility to support the State’s counterclaim in the consent of the investor in its different manifestations. Finally, the authors develop the problems of invoke a violation of human rights as basis of the State counterclaim.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116036959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Las reglas de Praga no son tan malas como parecen","authors":"M. Saavedra, Eduardo Dibos Figueroa","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1096","url":null,"abstract":"With increasing frequency, it is pointed out that international arbitration has become a costly, long and inefficient dispute resolution system. As an attempt to solve this problem, in 2018 the so-called Prague Rules were launched, an instrument of soft law to conduct arbitration under the tradition of inquisitive civil procedure. Thus, the authors analyze the Prague Rules and compare them with the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence. The authors review the rules on the display of documents, hearings, witnesses, experts e inferences. They suggest that, although the premises on which the Prague Rules are based are not entirely correct, they can be useful for judicial litigants with lesser experience in international arbitration. They consider that exogenous variables, such as the skills of the arbitrators and the legal culture of the lawyers, will affect their success or failure.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121728738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Algunas notas (e interrogantes) sobre las nuevas reglas CIADI para mediar disputas entre estados e inversionistas","authors":"Carlos Augusto Rios Pizarro","doi":"10.21678/forseti.v11i17.2067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v11i17.2067","url":null,"abstract":"El mérito de este trabajo busca abordar un mecanismo de resolución de disputas entre inversionistas y Estado como lo es la mediación. Para dicha finalidad, intentaremos aclarar -dentro de la extensión que nos permite el presente artículo ciertos temas que pueden ser de utilidad, como que entender por mediación, su uso en materia de disputa de inversiones, y su funcionamiento bajo las actuales reglas del CIADI.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126337848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}