{"title":"把苹果和橘子混在一起,或者如何在投资仲裁中谴责侵犯人权","authors":"Uber López Montreuil, Adriana García, Eduardo Dibos Figueroa","doi":"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes potential counterclaims of a State in an investment arbitration. Thus, the authors make a general revision of the fundamental concepts of investment arbitration focus in ICSID proceedings. On that basis, they verify thepossibility to support the State’s counterclaim in the consent of the investor in its different manifestations. Finally, the authors develop the problems of invoke a violation of human rights as basis of the State counterclaim.","PeriodicalId":248636,"journal":{"name":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mezclando manzanas con naranjas o cómo reconvenir violaciones de derechos humanos en arbitrajes de inversión\",\"authors\":\"Uber López Montreuil, Adriana García, Eduardo Dibos Figueroa\",\"doi\":\"10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes potential counterclaims of a State in an investment arbitration. Thus, the authors make a general revision of the fundamental concepts of investment arbitration focus in ICSID proceedings. On that basis, they verify thepossibility to support the State’s counterclaim in the consent of the investor in its different manifestations. Finally, the authors develop the problems of invoke a violation of human rights as basis of the State counterclaim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forseti: Revista de Derecho\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forseti: Revista de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forseti: Revista de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21678/FORSETI.V0I10.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mezclando manzanas con naranjas o cómo reconvenir violaciones de derechos humanos en arbitrajes de inversión
This article analyzes potential counterclaims of a State in an investment arbitration. Thus, the authors make a general revision of the fundamental concepts of investment arbitration focus in ICSID proceedings. On that basis, they verify thepossibility to support the State’s counterclaim in the consent of the investor in its different manifestations. Finally, the authors develop the problems of invoke a violation of human rights as basis of the State counterclaim.