The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy最新文献_第2页

Han Fei’s Rule of Law and its Limits 韩非的法治思想及其局限性

The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781350007222.CH-007

A. Bárcenas

引用次数: 0

“Son of Heaven”: Developing the Theological Aspects of Mengzi’s Philosophy of the Ruler “天子”:孟子治国哲学神学方面的发展

The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781350007222.CH-011

Joshua R. Brown

引用次数: 1

The Problem of Anxiety in the Zhuangzi as Contrasted with Indian and Hellenistic Views 《庄子》中的焦虑问题与印度和希腊观点的对比

The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781350007222.ch-010

Alexus McLeod

引用次数: 0

Confucian Role Ethics: Issues of Naming, Translation, and Interpretation 儒家角色伦理:命名、翻译与解释问题

The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781350007222.ch-001

S. Mattice

{"title":"Confucian Role Ethics: Issues of Naming, Translation, and Interpretation","authors":"S. Mattice","doi":"10.5040/9781350007222.ch-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350007222.ch-001","url":null,"abstract":"manuscripts and chapters in English concerning Confucian ethics. Some of these have an overtly historical/textual approach, while others are explicitly comparative (often between Confucius 孔子 or Mencius 孟子 and Aristotle), and some seek to put ideas from the classical period into conversation with issues in contemporary ethics. Some projects begin from within a more “analytic” orientation, while still others identify themselves as belonging to the “continental” tradition. Theorists have argued that Confucian ethics is best understood as a species of deontology, as a distinctive form of virtue ethics, and as care ethics, to name a few. The project of trying to figure out the best alreadypresent Western category to use for Confucian ethics is one that has occupied a great deal of time and effort in contemporary circles, and which may, as Stephen Angle has argued, be an example of the “unhealthy hegemony” of Western frameworks in comparative or crosscultural philosophy.1 As I see it, the project of Confucian Role Ethics (CRE), however, is not trying to intervene in that discourse. While Roger Ames and others use CHAPTER ONE","PeriodicalId":246080,"journal":{"name":"The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Early Chinese Ethics and Political Philosophy","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126640615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5