Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal最新文献_第4页

“EVERYTHING IS DONE IN THE MOST HONEST WAY...”: FRANZ KAFKA AND PASCALE KASANOVA ON THE PHENOMENON OF “SMALL LITERATURES” “一切都以最诚实的方式完成……——卡夫卡、卡萨诺瓦论“小文学”现象

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.12

引用次数: 0

“I’M A PEOPLE TOO”: ALEXEI KONSTANTINOVICH TOLSTOY AND THE SLAVOPHILES “我也是一个民族”:阿列克谢·康斯坦丁诺维奇·托尔斯泰与斯拉夫主义者

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03

A. Fedorov

{"title":"“I’M A PEOPLE TOO”: ALEXEI KONSTANTINOVICH TOLSTOY AND THE SLAVOPHILES","authors":"A. Fedorov","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the complex relationship of A.K. Tolstoy to the Slavophiles and their teachings. These relationships have been reflected in creativity and have undergone significant changes over time. Relative proximity - mid-1850 s, dialogue - late 1850 s-early 1860 s, polemic -late 1860 s-1870 s. The period of unity was associated with his interest as an artist in folk song stylistics and the idea of Slavic reunification. Then the desire to explain his aesthetic position matures in him, which is at odds with the ideas of the Slavophiles about the meaning and purpose of art (a poetic message to “I.S. Aksakov”). Subsequently, the dialogue develops into a polemic with a wider range of issues - Tolstoy does not accept a utilitarian attitude to literature, defends his understanding of the people, rethinks the role of Peter the Great in Russian history, exposes the painful consequences of the “Moscow” period, stigmatizes “Tatarism” as a dream of a new khan and an apology for tyranny and slavery, does not want to recognize superiority over the West in moral and religious terms, finally, paradoxically brings nihilists and Slavophiles closer, showing the destructive consequences of their ideas (“Potok-bogatyr”).","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121230892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

WHY IS THERE A HORROR OF THE FLOOR/SEX IN THE LIGHT BULB? TO THE INTERPRETATION OF THE POEM BY JOSEPH BRODSKY “I SAD FATE PLAYS A GAME WITHOUT A SCORE.” 为什么灯泡里有对地板/性的恐惧?对约瑟夫·布罗茨基的诗的解读“命运是一场没有分数的游戏。”

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.05

A. Ranchin

引用次数: 0

“SWORN ENEMIES”: ON THE QUESTION ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEREZHKOVSKII AND ROZANOV “不共戴天的敌人”:关于梅列日科夫斯基和罗扎诺夫之间关系的问题

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.08

引用次数: 0

SEMANTICS AND SYMBOLISM OF THE SQUARE IN THE POEM “LETTER” BY MARINA I. TSVETAEVA 茨维塔耶娃诗歌《信》中广场的语义与象征意义

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.03

Irina M. Logvinova

引用次数: 0

IRONIC PARADOXES IN A HERO OF OUR TIME 我们这个时代英雄身上的讽刺悖论

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.07

引用次数: 0

“THEN THERE WAS THE ARTICLE. ARTICLE BY THE TUR BROTHERS”: AN ATTEMPT OF COMMENTARY ON ONE LINE BY M.M. BAKHTIN 然后就有了那篇文章。《特尔兄弟的文章》:对巴赫金一行文字的评论

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.05

引用次数: 0

“NEXT TO GENIOUS”: G. FLAUBERT IN M.M. BAKHTIN’S THINKING “近乎天才”:巴赫金思想中的福楼拜

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09

Vitaliy Makhlin

{"title":"“NEXT TO GENIOUS”: G. FLAUBERT IN M.M. BAKHTIN’S THINKING","authors":"Vitaliy Makhlin","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes Bakhtin’s 1944 notes on Flaubert. Under discussion is, first, some general background of Bakhtin’s philosophical and scientific methodology as expressed in the notes, secondly, the notes themselves. Bakhtin’s views on Flaubert and the novel of the 19th century are re-presented in connection with the Russian thinker’s theories of the “grotesque realism” and “novelization”as opposed to the “ideological culture of the new times”. The article discusses some principal methodological difficulties of Bakhtinian approach to literary texts as expressed in his notes on Flaubert. In contrast to most philosophical approaches to literature, Bakhtin always treats any text, in his own expression, “in the liminal spheres” of different disciplines, that is, as both a philosopher and literary critic, a theorist and a historian of literature and culture. In these notes this specificity of the Bakhtinian methodology is expressed drastically, but in principal it is quite typical to his thinking “on the borders”. In the subsequent parts of the article Bakhtin’s approach to Flaubert’s “realism” is commented on, from the point of view of those elements of his artistic vision and his world view, which, according to Bakhtin, are not congruous with the concept of the so-called “critical realism”. These elements, Bakhtin implies, belong not so much to the classical novel of the 19th century, but, rather, to what he calls “grotesque realism” before the new times and in the 20th century. These elements are: mutual reversal of “short” and “long” (or “great” time in the images of the day, Flaubert’s artistic opposition to the “straightforwardness” of the idea of “progress” typical for the European Enlightenment and the modernity at large., the artist’s interest in the “elemental life” of human beings and animals. These and some other elements characteristic of Flaubert’s art and ideology, Bakhtin treats as if from within “creative consciousness” of the author.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123116515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

DEATH AS AN EXISTENTIAL CATEGORY IN FEDOR TYUTCHEV’S POEMS AND LETTERS 死亡是费多尔·秋切夫诗歌和书信中的一个存在范畴

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.08

引用次数: 0

MODEL OF RUSSIAN CULTURE IN S.P. SHEVYREV’S WORKS OF EARLY 1840'S 十九世纪四十年代初舍维列夫作品中的俄国文化模式

Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.02

N. Tsvetkova

引用次数: 0