Canadian Law eJournal最新文献_第9页

Critical Condition: A Historian's Prognosis on Canada's Aging Healthcare System 危急状况:历史学家对加拿大老龄化医疗保健系统的预测

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-11-18 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1721097

M. Bliss

引用次数: 29

Benchmarking Canada’s Global Competitiveness Initiatives: How Canadian Economic Policy Compares to the German and United Kingdom Models 对标加拿大的全球竞争力倡议:加拿大经济政策与德国和英国模式的比较

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-08-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1969080

John M. Curtis, Dan Ciuriak

引用次数: 3

Does Listening to Music Excerpts Online Amount to Fair Dealing? 在线收听音乐节选是否构成公平交易?

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-07-08 DOI: 10.1093/JIPLP/JPQ089

Dr. Emir Crowne, Yonatan Rozenszajn

引用次数: 1

Instream Flow and Athabasca Oil Sands Development: Contracting Out/Waiver of Legal Water Rights to Protect Instream Flow -- a Legal Analysis 溪流流量和阿萨巴斯卡油砂开发:外包/放弃合法水权以保护溪流流量——法律分析

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-04-20 DOI: 10.29173/ALR162

Arlene J. Kwasniak

引用次数: 1

Rethinking the Sex Discrimination Act - Does Canada’s Experience Suggest We Should Give Our Judges a Greater Role? 重新思考性别歧视法——加拿大的经验是否表明我们应该赋予我们的法官更大的作用?

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-03-15 DOI: 10.22459/SDUT.09.2010.10

Belinda Smith

引用次数: 3

Subordination Agreements, Bankruptcy and the PPSA 从属协议，破产和PPSA

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-03-01 DOI: 10.7939/R3GF0N98F

R. Wood

引用次数: 1

Grand Juries and ‘Proper Authorities’: Low Law, Soft Law and Local Governance in Canada West/Ontario, 1850-1880 大陪审团和“适当的权威”:1850-1880年加拿大西部/安大略省的低法、软法和地方治理

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-01-13 DOI: 10.3138/9781442670051-014

M. Stokes

引用次数: 0

Public and Elite Policy Preferences: Gay Marriage in Canada 公众和精英的政策偏好:加拿大的同性婚姻

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI: 10.7202/1002175AR

D. Pettinicchio

引用次数: 15

Re-Visiting Meltsner: Policy Advice Systems and the Multi-Dimensional Nature of Professional Policy Analysis 再访Meltsner:政策咨询系统和专业政策分析的多维性

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2009-12-30 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1546251

Michael Howlett, A. Wellstead

{"title":"Re-Visiting Meltsner: Policy Advice Systems and the Multi-Dimensional Nature of Professional Policy Analysis","authors":"Michael Howlett, A. Wellstead","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1546251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1546251","url":null,"abstract":"Over thirty-years ago Meltsner (1976) observed in the case of the U.S. that analysts undertook a number of roles in the policy-making process, most of which did not involve neutral technical information processing. Contrary to the picture of carefully-recruited analysts trained in policy schools to undertake specific types of micro-economic-inspired policy analysis, investigators have continued to find little evidence of a predominance of ‘technicians’ employed in public policy bureaucracies. Page and Jenkins (2005) and Fleischer (2009) for example provided some empirical evidence that British and German policy-making typically features a group of ‘policy process generalists’ who rarely, if ever, deal with policy matters in the substantive areas in which they were trained and who had, in fact, very little training in formal policy analysis techniques such as cost-benefit analysis or risk assessment. However only very weak and partial, usually anecdotal, information exists on the situation found in most countries (Colebatch and Radin 2006) and taxonomies as a result remain thought-provoking but lacking empirical referents (see for example, Mayer, Bots and van Daalen 2004). This paper draws on a large-scale survey of provincial and territorial policy analysts in Canada to re-examine the duties and nature of professional policy analysts and analysis and reveals a complex and multi-sided set of practices which constitute contemporary policy work.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125375901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Producer Guidelines for Canadian Content Tax Credits 加拿大内容税收抵免制片人指南

Canadian Law eJournal Pub Date : 2009-12-04 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1554046

Raluca David

{"title":"Producer Guidelines for Canadian Content Tax Credits","authors":"Raluca David","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1554046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1554046","url":null,"abstract":"The government of Canada provides financial support for a movie filmed in Canada but it provides even greater tax incentives if the movie qualifies as a Canadian content production. Canadian content for tax credit purposes is regulated by the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO), a branch of the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), who jointly administer the Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit Program (CPTC) and the Film or Video Production Services Tax Credit Program (PSTC). Only one of these tax credits may be claimed for a particular production. Canadian content for broadcast purposes is regulated by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). The Canadian Film and Television Production Association (CFTPA) reviews the government guidelines and provides advice on topics regarding the film and television industry. The CPTC Guidelines set out the requirements for qualifying for Canadian content tax credits for films. The focus of this essay is on Appendix I of the CPTC Guidelines, the CAVCO Producer Control Guidelines, and specifically the requirement that the Canadian producer have 100% copyright ownership for at least 25 years. The three issues arising from this requirement are less investment opportunities for producers, an incongruity between CAVCO and CRTC guidelines and government goals. Finally, the first two problems are the result of the CAVCO Producer Control Guidelines not only being very strict but also being just a formality. I argue that 100% copyright ownership should not be a requirement of qualifying for Canadian content tax credits for films, or that the 25-year condition should be lowered, or both.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132012985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0