{"title":"In Search for a Jurisprudential Justification for the Recognition of a Right of Publicity in Kenya","authors":"Moses Njoroge Muchiri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3201274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3201274","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Publicity rights fall in the intersection between classic intellectual property rights law, unfair trade practices law and privacy rights law. This is an area that has recently witnessed notable judicial decisions in Kenya which have not gained ample exposure and is therefore worth looking into as an area for potential emerging jurisprudence. A look at the existing practices across different jurisdictions in the world reveals various positions and approaches with respect to publicity rights. On one hand, there are jurisdictions in which publicity rights are categorized within the broad spectrum of personality rights, while in other jurisdictions these rights are treated as proprietary rights. Some jurisdictions also take a hybrid approach that amalgamates both proprietary and personality rights approaches. Publicity rights cut across four broad legal areas: tort, property, privacy and unfair trade practice law. These rights also have common similarities with copyright and trademark rights, although they are not synonymous. A significant number of countries which recognize a right of publicity have a mixture of elements of these areas, either as a form of common law approach based on the tort of passing off, or specific statutory enactments on publicity rights. Legal practice and development in each jurisdiction must be considered in the knowledge that each country has developed specific publicity rights mechanisms in response to the socio-economic needs and realities existing in its particular jurisdiction. This study surveys the legal landscape with respect to development of personality rights in Kenya. It also takes a brief look at several other select jurisdictions in an attempt to answer the question whether there is a jurisprudential justification for the recognition of a publicity right in Kenya.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116526777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"'Digital Due Process': A Need for Online Justice","authors":"F. Mostert","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa024","url":null,"abstract":"Social media platforms have evolved into the ‘modern public square’ - with all the legal complexities involved. Public discourse, free speech and global online crime prevention are all at present under extreme pressures, due, ironically, to both significant over-blocking and under-blocking by social media platforms. \u0000 \u0000At the one end of the spectrum, user-generated content is far too often subject to robo-takedowns. At the other extreme, clearly criminal activities such as online child sexual abuse runs rampant and is not blocked nearly enough throughout the world. These two extremes are to a great extent caused by an inadequate and unbalanced content moderation and legal architecture developed by the digital gatekeepers. Moreover, the manner in which the Internet’s so-called ‘attention merchants’ and ‘surveillance capitalists’ abuse personal privacy through the data-harvesting and micro-targeting of individuals who gather in the ‘modern public squares’ is of enormous public concern internationally. \u0000 \u0000There is a clear and present need to ensure justice is done within the international digital community as evidenced by the public outcry on these fundamental issues as they play out on the world’s social media platforms. \u0000 \u0000“Digital due process” might form the basis of an online infrastructure to restore fundamental freedoms and support the rule of law in the digital world.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125208877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The German Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2019","authors":"Ansgar Ohly","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3578381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3578381","url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces and analyses the German Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2019 (Geschaftsgeheimnisgesetz), which implements the EU Trade Secrets Directive 2016/943. It also addresses issues of interpretation left open by the Directive, which will have to be decided by the CJEU and the national courts.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122546032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Přírodní Léčitelství, Tradiční Vědění a Duševní Vlastnictví (Natural Healing, Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property)","authors":"I. Telec","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3206055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3206055","url":null,"abstract":"Czech Abstract: Podrobna pravni analýza problemu týkajiciho se otazek přirodniho lecitelstvi, tradicniho věděni a dusevniho vlastnictvi. Nahliženo pohledem platneho ceskeho pravniho řadu a z hlediska soucasneho ceskeho spolecenskeho prostředi. English Abstract: The detailed legal analyse of the topic concerning the issues of the natural healing, traditional knowledge and intellectual property especially from the recent Czech law point of view and the Czech social environment.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124680944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Philip Morris v Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation","authors":"Pratyush Nath Upreti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3125316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125316","url":null,"abstract":"Philip Morris v Uruguay is one of the first high profile cases where IPRs have been litigated in investor state dispute settlement (ISDS). The tribunal decision reaffirms the state’s sovereign right to regulate matters of public interest and held that public health measures do not amount to expropriation and violation of fair and equitable treatment under international investment law. The tribunal decision in favour of Uruguay and in general the success of tobacco plain packaging attracted countries to adopt such measures for unhealthy foods and drinks. This reflects that globally we are moving towards new IP system for health.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130175622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intellectual Property Licensing Tensions: In Utilizing Open Source Software in the Formal Standard Setting Context - The Case of Apache V.2 in ETSI As a Start","authors":"Jingze Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3083840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3083840","url":null,"abstract":"Open Source Software (OSS) is playing an increasing role in ICT standardizations on future technologies such as 5G and the Internet of Things. Formal standard settings organizations (SSOs) are exploring ways to utilize OSS. This paper depicts the difference between open source licenses and the current SSOs legal framework in dealing with intellectual property rights, mainly the FRAND license commitment for patented technologies and copyright guidelines for software in specifications. Such difference might cause tensions in the two scenarios of the interactions between SSOs and OSS: in the implementation phase and in the standardization activity phase. We argue that the current IPRs framework of SSOs shows gaps in utilization of OSS. Further, one recent example from the ETSI, hosting an open source project under Apache v.2, might enrich our findings and shed some light on how SSOs can avoid tensions by adjusting the governing framework.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115249370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Investing in Intellectual Property: A Real Asset for Institutional Portfolios","authors":"D. Reckling, Laurens Rensch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3471499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3471499","url":null,"abstract":"Over the centuries, the concept of intellectual property (IP) has been praised for protecting the rights of inventors and artists but also criticized for supposedly harming the public interest. Many academics, IP specialists, national and international agencies and financial and legal experts have all weighed in on the topic in one form or another. There is a large body of written work exploring IP from all angles philosophical, legal and financial but somewhat less attention has been given to the subject from an investment perspective. This book attempts to bring existing knowledge together, to separate myth from fact and to contribute to a better understanding of IP while paying specific attention to investment-related topics.<br><br>Starting with an overview of the main forms of IP, this book then moves on to discuss the interaction between these “intangibles” and the “real world.” The final part takes a close look at key topics and concepts related to investments in IP. <br>","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134429120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intellectual Property Protection Comes to the National Football League","authors":"J. Finger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3019591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3019591","url":null,"abstract":"Some useful and productive social systems would be destroyed by the policing of intellectual property “rights” within them. This note examines how US professional (gridiron) football would be affected.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125309307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spill Your (Trade) Secrets: Knowledge Networks as Innovation Drivers","authors":"Laura G. Pedraza-Fariña","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2944701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944701","url":null,"abstract":"Theories of intellectual property take the individual inventor or the firm as the unit of innovation. But studies in economic sociology show that in complex fields where knowledge is rapidly advancing and widely dispersed among different firms, the locus of innovation is neither an individual nor a single firm. Rather, innovative ideas originate in the informal networks of learning and collaboration that cut across firms. \u0000Understanding innovation in this subset of industries as emerging out of networks of informal information-sharing across firms challenges traditional utilitarian theories of trade secret law — which assume trade secret protection is needed to prevent excessive private, self-help efforts to preserve secrecy. Doctrinally, knowledge network research suggests that the scope of trade secret protection in these industries should be narrow. In these industries, strong trade secret rights that grant managers tight control over employee-inventors’ informal information-sharing practices are bad innovation policy. Rather, optimizing trade secret law requires tailoring the strength of protection to match industry characteristics, narrowing trade secret scope in those industries where informal information-sharing networks play a prominent role. In turn, because industry types tend to cluster around geographic centers, the importance of tailoring cautions against current trends towards uniformity by federalizing trade secret law and favors state experimentalism in designing trade secret law and policy.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123911040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Review of Russian Economic Legislation","authors":"I. Tolmacheva, Julia Grunina","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2330876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2330876","url":null,"abstract":"In July 2013, amendments were introduced into Part Four of the Civil Code as regards to state regulation of relations in the sphere of intellectual property. Procedure was specified for intestate succession of escheat property into ownership of a municipal entity and constituent entity of the Russian Federation. The age of a foreign national at which he/she has the right to work in the territory of the Russian Federation has been established. It is established that when a foreign national stays in the Russian Federation under an ordinary work visa he/she can study at an educational establishment in the Russian Federation without securing a change in the purpose of the visit to the Russian Federation. From September 1, 2013 the procedure for acknowledging of the documents on education and qualification issued by Russian educational establishments, as well as those of RSFSR and the USSR will be renewed.","PeriodicalId":242613,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124846917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}