Vox Patrum最新文献_第10页

Doroczna Konferencja Północnoamerykańskiego Towarzystwa Patrystycznego (NAPS) (Chicago, USA, 26-28.05.2022)

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14836

M. Wysocki

引用次数: 1

The Catalogue of Virtues in the "Ecclesiastical History" of Sozomen of Bethelia 伯特利亚的索佐门的“教会历史”中的美德目录

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14012

S. Bralewski

{"title":"The Catalogue of Virtues in the \"Ecclesiastical History\" of Sozomen of Bethelia","authors":"S. Bralewski","doi":"10.31743/vp.14012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.14012","url":null,"abstract":"On the one hand, in his Ecclesiastical History, Sozomen presented the qualities of the ruler he held in high esteem – Theodosius II; on the other, he listed characteristics of the ascetics he admired, the new sages, living – in his view – according to the principles of the best philosophy. Interestingly, in this presentation, he applied an almost identical set of virtues that he attributed to both rulers and monks. In both cases he equated piety with wisdom and made them the most important, leading virtues. They were the ones that conditioned the subsequent qualities. Thus, in Sozomen’s account, one can trace the theory of the unity of virtues characteristic of Socrates of Athens. It claimed that one cannot possess a particle of virtue without possessing the whole, nor can one possess one specific virtue without possessing all of them. It seems that the order of virtues used by Sozomen in the catalogue of virtues ascribed to Theodosius II is not accidental, and reflects their hierarchy: εὐσέβεια-σοφία φιλανθρωπία, ἀνδρεία, σωφροσύνη, δικαιοσύνη, φιλοτιμία, and μεγαλοψυχία. This hierarchy stems from the Christian values adopted by Sozomen.","PeriodicalId":23994,"journal":{"name":"Vox Patrum","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89426913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Umiarkowanie i roztropność Symeona, władcy bułgarskiego w listach Mikołaja Mistyka, patriarchy Konstantynopola. Kilka uwag

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14045

Mirosław J. Leszka

引用次数: 0

Enemy of All Virtues: Once Again on the Image of Simeon the Great in the Oration “On the Treaty with the Bulgarians”

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14058

Kirił Marinow

{"title":"Enemy of All Virtues: Once Again on the Image of Simeon the Great in the Oration “On the Treaty with the Bulgarians”","authors":"Kirił Marinow","doi":"10.31743/vp.14058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.14058","url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the Bulgarian Tsar Simeon I the Great (893-927), who in the second half of his reign entered into a protracted military and ideological conflict with the Byzantine Empire. He wished not only to extend his dominions at the expense of his southern neighbour, but also to equal him in titular power, and it is possible - although scholars differ on this point - that his aspirations reached even further, namely Constantinople itself. Either way, Bulgaria under his reign posed a serious threat to Byzantium and its main antagonist. The death of the Tsar in 927 and the conclusion of peace with the Empire by his son, Peter I (927-969), finally put an end to the conflict between both the states. The celebrations marking the conclusion of the agreement provided an opportunity to take stock. In a rhetorical speech written for the occasion, Simeon's actions and aspirations were severely criticised – through comparisons to figures from ancient literature and biblical texts, the Byzantine speaker discredited the attitude of this ruler. Comparisons to those of them who aroused negative connotations in listeners and readers deprived Simeon of all the virtues belonging to a Christian ruler and, above all, of the cardinal ones by which he should, above all, legitimise himself.","PeriodicalId":23994,"journal":{"name":"Vox Patrum","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73546757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Could a Caliph Be Virtuous? Selected Aspects of the Image of Muslim Rulers in the "Chronography" of Theophanes the Confessor 哈里发能有德行吗?忏悔者提奥法尼“年表”中穆斯林统治者形象的若干方面

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14057

Błażej Cecota

引用次数: 1

Pamięć. Sposoby i cel pamiętania w chrześcijaństwie antycznym (XLVIII Spotkanie Badaczy Antyku Chrześcijańskiego, Instytut Patrystyczny Augustynianum, Rzym, 5-7.05.2022)

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14838

M. Wysocki

引用次数: 0

Karol Piotr KULPA, Tyconius’ Theological Reception of 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12, seria History of Biblical Exegesis 4, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2022, ss. XIX + 319 库尔帕:《太古尼乌斯对帖撒罗尼迦后书2:3-12的神学理解》，《圣经释经史4》，莫尔·西贝克，<s:1>宾根2022，页19 + 319

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14677

D. Budzanowska-Weglenda

引用次数: 1

Posiedzenia naukowe Komisji Badań nad Antykiem Chrześcijańskim KUL w latach 2017-2022

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14667

P. Wilk

引用次数: 1

Cyryl Aleksandryjski, Komentarz do Pierwszego Listu św. Pawła do Koryntian, z języka greckiego, syryjskiego i armeńskiego przełożył, wstępem i objaśnieniami opatrzył Konrad F. Zawadzki, Edycja Świętego Pawła, Częstochowa 2022, ss. 261

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14628

Józef Pochwat

引用次数: 0

The Lost Cameo, the Vanished Statue of the Emperor and Constantine as a New Alexander 失落的浮雕，消失的皇帝雕像和新亚历山大的君士坦丁

Vox Patrum Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.31743/vp.14119

P. Grotowski

{"title":"The Lost Cameo, the Vanished Statue of the Emperor and Constantine as a New Alexander","authors":"P. Grotowski","doi":"10.31743/vp.14119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.14119","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to propose a reinterpretation of the meaning of the lost colossus of Constantine the Great from the Forum of his name in Constantinople, in the light of the iconography of the emperor on the cameo from the cathedral in the Pomeranian town of Cammin. Although the gem was lost during the last war, it is known to us thanks to archival photographs and the plaster cast housed at Göttingen University. On this basis, Gerda Bruns associated the jewel with the statue of Constantine on the porphyry column in the New Rome, and her identification has since been widely accepted by the scholarly milieu. In recent years one has been able to observe growing popularity of this interpretation among researchers, who however refrain in their studies from pointing to the consequences of such a reconstruction of the statue’s form. \u0000 The author of this paper points out that Constantine purposefully chose the iconographical type of Alexander-ktistes as a model for his own representation in order to allude to his great predecessor and the founder of a number of cities which bore his name. The iconography of the statue became then a part of the programme of the celebrations arranged on the occasion of the dedication of Constantinople, in which numerous references to Alexander played the key role. This new understanding of the colossus, placing its significance within the frames of political propaganda, better matches the actual historical circumstances and the ruler’s attitude towards Christendom than traditional interpretations which recognised the statue as Helios or Apollo, and thus introduced an incoherence — difficult to explain — in Constantine’s attitude towards the new religion. This cumbersome question, which baffled the inquisitive minds already in the Constantinople of the Byzantine era, will be considered unsubstantial if we correctly interpret the monument on the Forum solely in the political and propagandistic context.","PeriodicalId":23994,"journal":{"name":"Vox Patrum","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74686534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1