{"title":"[Cardiovascular risk in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Evidence-based strategies for risk reduction in rheumatologic practice].","authors":"Stefan Kleinert","doi":"10.1007/s00393-026-01800-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00393-026-01800-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) have a persistently increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and higher mortality, independently of traditional CV risk factors. Effective control of inflammation reduces CV events, whereas glucocorticoids increase the risk in a dose- and duration-dependent manner, even at ≤ 5 mg prednisolone/day. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs especially tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, are largely protective through the reduction of systemic inflammation. For patients receiving Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or long-term glucocorticoid therapy, a structured CV risk assessment and guideline-based management of modifiable risk factors (including lipid optimization/statin therapy) are essential. Primary prevention should be based on the cardiovascular prevention guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Vaccinations (influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcus, respiratory syncytial virus, zoster) represent an effective pillar of CV prevention in populations at cardiovascular risk; however, evidence in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases is still lacking. The main challenge for CV prevention remains implementation: digital clinical reminders/decision support systems and multicomponent strategies can improve the implementation of recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"307-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147634423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Florian Schuch, Klaus Krüger, Anna Voormann, Dorothea John, Luisa Martens, Kirsten Hoeper
{"title":"[Professional situation of rheumatological specialist assistants (RFA, DGRh-BDRh) after training : Results of a nationwide survey in 2024].","authors":"Florian Schuch, Klaus Krüger, Anna Voormann, Dorothea John, Luisa Martens, Kirsten Hoeper","doi":"10.1007/s00393-026-01777-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00393-026-01777-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the introduction of the qualification for rheumatological specialist assistants (RFA) by the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh) in 2006, this advanced training has become an established component of rheumatological care. Although more than 2000 medical assistants have since completed the RFA qualification, only limited data have been available on their professional situation after completion of the program. The aim of the present nationwide online survey was to assess the current professional situation, areas of activity, job satisfaction and career paths of RFAs in Germany.In October 2024 all graduates from 2006-2024 known to the Rheumatism Academy (Rheumaakademie, n = 677) were invited via email. A total of 263 individuals completed the questionnaire (response rate 39%), of whom 243 provided complete responses.At the time of the survey 81% (n = 199/245) of respondents were still working as RFAs, mostly in rheumatology practices (71%). Independent RFA consultation hours were conducted by 44% (n = 86) of participants, with most offering their own appointments, using defined procedures and having separate consultation rooms available. The main reasons cited for leaving RFA work were high workload, lack of development opportunities, and insufficient recognition. Nevertheless, 96% of those who had left the RFA role remained employed in the medical field.The results show that the RFA has become firmly established as a key component of rheumatological care in Germany; however, due to voluntary participation and limited reachability of all graduates, selection bias is likely and particularly RFAs no longer working in the profession may be underrepresented.To sustainably strengthen and retain this professional group, structural improvements are necessary, especially legal clarification of delegable tasks, the establishment of reimbursement options for RFA consultation hours and the development of advanced qualifications and career pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"324-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"KI beim Publizieren: Was Ärzt*innen wissen und konkret beachten sollten.","authors":"Ines Wolff, Henning Schönenberger","doi":"10.1007/s00393-026-01817-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-026-01817-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":"85 4","pages":"259-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147783119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aiman Gamal Abdelrahim, Julian Schulze Zur Wiesch, Ulrike Schnoor, Stefan Schmiedel
{"title":"[Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: case report of a 32-year-old woman with lymphadenopathy and fever].","authors":"Aiman Gamal Abdelrahim, Julian Schulze Zur Wiesch, Ulrike Schnoor, Stefan Schmiedel","doi":"10.1007/s00393-025-01725-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00393-025-01725-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"320-323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Willm Uwe Kampen, Lutz S Freudenberg, Knut Liepe, Barbara Boddenberg-Pätzold, Norbert Czech, Christoph Neumann-Glück, Rigobert Klett, Manfred Fischer
{"title":"Wirkung und Stellenwert der Radiosynoviorthese im Behandlungskonzept entzündlicher Gelenkerkankungen.","authors":"Willm Uwe Kampen, Lutz S Freudenberg, Knut Liepe, Barbara Boddenberg-Pätzold, Norbert Czech, Christoph Neumann-Glück, Rigobert Klett, Manfred Fischer","doi":"10.1007/s00393-026-01791-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00393-026-01791-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"331-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147445393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Indirect comparative efficacy and safety of belimumab vs. anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Young Ho Lee, Gwan Gyu Song","doi":"10.1007/s00393-025-01760-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00393-025-01760-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Belimumab and anifrolumab are two biologic therapies currently employed in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Belimumab is approved for both SLE and lupus nephritis (LN), whereas anifrolumab is not currently approved for LN and has only been evaluated for LN in one published phase II trial. Direct head-to-head comparative data are lacking. This meta-analysis aims to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of belimumab and anifrolumab using evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Indirect comparative analyses were conducted using odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) derived from clinical trial data comparing both belimumab and anifrolumab with placebo for SLE and LN. Primary endpoints included SRI‑4 response, SELENA-SLEDAI ≥ 4 reduction, corticosteroid dose reduction, incidence of severe flares, normalization of anti-dsDNA, and normalization of C3/C4 in SLE as well as complete renal response (CRR), renal event-free survival, and immunologic biomarkers in LN. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of herpes zoster, serious infections, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs comprising 4332 patients treated with either belimumab or anifrolumab for SLE or LN were included in this meta-analysis. For SLE, belimumab demonstrated superior SRI‑4 response rates (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.25-3.16) relative to anifrolumab, whereas anifrolumab yielded greater benefit in steroid tapering (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.19-0.51) and immunologic normalization (anti-dsDNA: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.43-1.10; C3/C4: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.42-1.13). In LN, both agents improved CRR rates compared to placebo; however, indirect comparisons between the two agents were not definitive due to wide confidence intervals (CRR: OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.22-3.10). Safety profiles were similar in terms of serious infections and mortality, although anifrolumab was linked to higher rates of herpes zoster (7.2% vs. 3.2-4.6% for belimumab).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Belimumab confers greater benefit in terms of SRI‑4 response for SLE, while anifrolumab is more effective for corticosteroid tapering and immunologic parameter normalization. In LN, the comparative efficacy remains uncertain. Both agents exhibit similar safety profiles, but anifrolumab is associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster. Differences in study design, inclusion criteria, and assessment protocols among included trials may limit direct comparability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}