HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)最新文献

Disposition Effect across Distinct Investor Categories in a Tax-Free Context: Are Team Dynamics and Cognitive Dissonance behind It? 免税背景下不同投资者类别的处置效应:背后是团队动力和认知失调吗?

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-04-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3824349

A. de Groot, Laura Núñez-Letamendia, Olivier de Groot

引用次数: 0

Asset Purchase Bailouts and Endogenous Implicit Guarantees 资产购买救助和内生隐性担保

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-09-18 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3105470

Eric Mengus

引用次数: 2

Updating Confidence in Beliefs 更新信念的信心

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-05-08 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3385116

Brian Hill

引用次数: 5

The Present and Future of Judgement Aggregation Theory. A Law and Economics Perspective 判断聚合理论的现状与未来。法律与经济学视角

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3224608

P. Mongin

{"title":"The Present and Future of Judgement Aggregation Theory. A Law and Economics Perspective","authors":"P. Mongin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3224608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224608","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter briefly reviews the present state of judgment aggregation theory and tentatively suggests a future direction for that theory. In the review, we start by emphasizing the difference between the doctrinal paradox and the discursive dilemma, two idealized examples which classically serve to motivate the theory, and then proceed to reconstruct it as a brand of logical theory, unlike in some other interpretations, using a single impossibility theorem as a key to its technical development. In the prospective part, having mentioned existing applications to social choice theory and computer science, which we do not discuss here, we consider a potential application to law and economics. This would be based on a deeper exploration of the doctrinal paradox and its relevance to the functioning of collegiate courts. On this topic, legal theorists have provided empirical observations and theoretical hints that judgment aggregation theorists would be in a position to clarify and further elaborate. As a general message, the chapter means to suggest that the future of judgment aggregation theory lies with its applications rather than its internal theoretical development.","PeriodicalId":234020,"journal":{"name":"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114868569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Decision Theory Made Relevant: Between the Software and the Shrink 决策理论的相关性:在软件和收缩之间

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3178715

I. Gilboa, Maria Rouziou, O. Sibony

{"title":"Decision Theory Made Relevant: Between the Software and the Shrink","authors":"I. Gilboa, Maria Rouziou, O. Sibony","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3178715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178715","url":null,"abstract":"Decision theory offers a formal approach to decision making, which is often viewed and taught as the rational way to approach managerial decisions. Half a century ago it generated high hopes of capturing and perhaps replacing intuition, and providing the “right” answer in practically all managerial situations. Today it seems fair to say that decision theory has not lived up to these expectations. Behavioral science provides ample evidence that managers fail to follow the dicta of decision theory, even when these are explained to them. As a result, executives often find decision theory frustrating and useless and prefer to rely on their intuition. This paper suggests that this extreme conclusion is unwarranted and calls for a re-appraisal of decision theory. We propose that it should not always be regarded as a mathematical tool that produces the answer; rather, it can be viewed as a framework for a dialog between the decision maker and the decision theorist. In one extreme, the decision theorist studies the problem and provides the “correct’’ answer. But in another, the decision theorist only challenges the decision maker’s intuition and logic. In between, a whole gamut of possible dialogs exists, in which decision theory doesn’t replace intuition, but supports and refines it.","PeriodicalId":234020,"journal":{"name":"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125938089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Input Substitutability, Trade Costs and the Product Cycle 投入可替代性、贸易成本与产品周期

HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic) Pub Date : 2011-01-19 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2240138

T. Michalski

引用次数: 0