免税背景下不同投资者类别的处置效应:背后是团队动力和认知失调吗?

A. de Groot, Laura Núñez-Letamendia, Olivier de Groot
{"title":"免税背景下不同投资者类别的处置效应:背后是团队动力和认知失调吗?","authors":"A. de Groot, Laura Núñez-Letamendia, Olivier de Groot","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3824349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on recent literature and employing survival analysis on trading data, we document differences in the strength and direction of the disposition effect on distinct categories of investors: (i) individuals not receiving professional advice; (ii) individuals receiving it; (iii) professional managers of delegated retail portfolios; (iv) professional managers of funds/institutional portfolios. We also find that the disposition effect is contingent upon paper gain-loss magnitudes in a more complex way than the V-shape proposed by the literature, and that market ups-downs do not exert influence on the propensity to this bias. We interpret our results using alternative explanations of investor behavior.","PeriodicalId":234020,"journal":{"name":"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disposition Effect across Distinct Investor Categories in a Tax-Free Context: Are Team Dynamics and Cognitive Dissonance behind It?\",\"authors\":\"A. de Groot, Laura Núñez-Letamendia, Olivier de Groot\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3824349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on recent literature and employing survival analysis on trading data, we document differences in the strength and direction of the disposition effect on distinct categories of investors: (i) individuals not receiving professional advice; (ii) individuals receiving it; (iii) professional managers of delegated retail portfolios; (iv) professional managers of funds/institutional portfolios. We also find that the disposition effect is contingent upon paper gain-loss magnitudes in a more complex way than the V-shape proposed by the literature, and that market ups-downs do not exert influence on the propensity to this bias. We interpret our results using alternative explanations of investor behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3824349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEC Paris: Economics & Decision Sciences (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3824349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于最近的文献和对交易数据的生存分析,我们记录了处置效应对不同类别投资者的强度和方向的差异:(i)未接受专业建议的个人;(二)接收信息的个人;(iii)委托零售投资组合的职业经理人;(iv)基金/机构投资组合的职业经理人。我们还发现,处置效应以一种比文献中提出的v形更复杂的方式取决于账面损益幅度,并且市场起伏不会对这种偏见的倾向产生影响。我们使用投资者行为的替代解释来解释我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disposition Effect across Distinct Investor Categories in a Tax-Free Context: Are Team Dynamics and Cognitive Dissonance behind It?
Building on recent literature and employing survival analysis on trading data, we document differences in the strength and direction of the disposition effect on distinct categories of investors: (i) individuals not receiving professional advice; (ii) individuals receiving it; (iii) professional managers of delegated retail portfolios; (iv) professional managers of funds/institutional portfolios. We also find that the disposition effect is contingent upon paper gain-loss magnitudes in a more complex way than the V-shape proposed by the literature, and that market ups-downs do not exert influence on the propensity to this bias. We interpret our results using alternative explanations of investor behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信