{"title":"Quantiferon Indeterminate Results: Understanding Their Impact on Tuberculosis Screening for SOT Candidates.","authors":"Guilherme Santoro-Lopes, Wanessa Trindade Clemente","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005238","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005238","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"584-585"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005195
Chia-Yu Chiu, Maryam Mahmood, Lisa M Brumble, Holenarasipur R Vikram, Elitza S Theel, Elena Beam
{"title":"Analysis of Indeterminate QuantiFERON Assay Results in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Proposed Management Algorithm.","authors":"Chia-Yu Chiu, Maryam Mahmood, Lisa M Brumble, Holenarasipur R Vikram, Elitza S Theel, Elena Beam","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005195","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mitigate the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. TB reactivation is higher in those with indeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) than those with negative results. Management of indeterminate QFT results in the pretransplant period remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, 18 y and older, who were screened with QFT assay pretransplantation at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and June 2023. We examined the frequency of indeterminate QFT results, results of repeat LTBI screening, treatment decisions, and rate of posttransplant TB infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13 008 patients screened for LTBI before SOT, 736 (6%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. Among these, 247 (34%) underwent a second LTBI screening test, and 39 (5%) received LTBI treatment. Among 247 patients with a repeat LTBI screening test, 185 (75%), 48 (19%), and 14 (6%) were tested by QFT, T-SPOT.TB, or TST, respectively. The repeat QFT remained indeterminate in 160 (86%) patients, whereas all T-SPOT.TB results were negative. Posttransplant TB infection occurred in 2 (0.3%) patients; neither had a second TB screening test pretransplant nor received LTBI treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In SOT recipients with indeterminate QFT results at pretransplant evaluation, opting for T-SPOT.TB as a second test may be preferable over repeat QFT. TB infection after transplantation in patients with a pretransplant indeterminate QFT result was rare. Patient management and LTBI treatment in those with indeterminate QFT pretransplant should account for epidemiological risk factors, and shared decision-making is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"729-735"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142155047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"TDO2 Deficiency Exacerbates the Immune Rejection Response in Rat Liver Transplantation via the Kyn-AHR Axis.","authors":"Shanbao Li, Lei Li, Junyong Weng, Zeping He, Jing Lu, Wanyue Cao, Fangbin Song, Zhonglin Zhu, Bingjie Guan, Jinyan Zhang, Junming Xu","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase2 (TDO2), a key enzyme in the L-tryptophan (Trp)-kynurenine (Kyn) pathway, in liver transplant immunity is unclear. This study aims to explore the role of TDO2 in liver transplant rejection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 to construct a TDO2 knockout rat model for liver transplant rejection. We validated the effects of TDO2 on acute rejection and survival, assessed TDO2 expression, and measured Trp and Kyn levels. We studied how TDO2 deficiency affects inflammatory cytokines, analyzed immune cell subtypes and their spatial distribution, and examined programmed death 1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PDL1) spatial distribution and expression using multiplex immunohistochemistry. We also validated the regulatory mechanism of TDO2 on transplant-related immune cells in vivo and in vitro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TDO2 deficiency in the allograft liver worsens acute rejection and reduces survival rates. During transplant rejection, TDO2 expression increases, enhancing Trp metabolism and elevating serum Kyn levels. TDO2 knockout mitigates this process. The TDO2-Kyn-aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway regulates acute rejection. TDO2 knockout reprograms immune cell distribution, decreasing regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages in the intermediate region while increasing CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages in the portal area, leading to M1 polarization. Additionally, TDO2 deficiency raises programmed death 1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression, varying with the spatial distribution and quantity of immune cells. TDO2 can regulate the proliferation and differentiation of various immune cells through the Kyn-aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, we elucidated the mechanism of TDO2 in liver transplant immune rejection and used spatial immunity to reveal the impact of TDO2 on liver transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143754631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-09-04DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005196
Junji Yamauchi, Divya Raghavan, Duha Jweehan, Suayp Oygen, Silviana Marineci, Isaac E Hall, Miklos Z Molnar
{"title":"Belatacept Versus Tacrolimus for Kidney Transplant Recipients of Deceased Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: US National Database Study.","authors":"Junji Yamauchi, Divya Raghavan, Duha Jweehan, Suayp Oygen, Silviana Marineci, Isaac E Hall, Miklos Z Molnar","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005196","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear whether kidney grafts from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) are more vulnerable to calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, and whether de novo use of belatacept is more beneficial than tacrolimus for recipients of these types of kidney transplants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study using the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we created 1:4 matches with highly similar characteristics for recipients of AKI-donor kidneys receiving belatacept versus tacrolimus for initial maintenance immunosuppression and compared outcomes for graft function, patient and graft survival, and rejection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohort consisted of 567 and 2268 recipients administered belatacept and tacrolimus, respectively. Posttransplant estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher in the belatacept group at 6 mo (58.2 ± 24.2 versus 54.6 ± 21.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001); however, the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance at 12 mo (57.2 ± 24.3 versus 55.7 ± 22.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.057). Median follow-up periods were 3.2 and 3.1 y for patient and graft survival, respectively. There were no significant differences between belatacept versus tacrolimus for mortality (hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.47], P = 0.14) or death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1.17 [0.85-1.61], P = 0.33). Rejection rate within 12 mo was significantly higher in the belatacept group (13% versus 7%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this matched cohort study, initial use of belatacept for AKI-donor kidney recipients was associated with small benefits in early graft function when compared with tacrolimus. Although rejection risk was significantly higher in recipients administered belatacept, patient and graft survival were not significantly different between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"691-700"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005391
Daniel G Maluf, Nazia Selzner, Valeria R Mas
{"title":"Harnessing TDO2-mediated Metabolism to Modulate Immune Rejection in Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Daniel G Maluf, Nazia Selzner, Valeria R Mas","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005391","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005198
Olga Charnaya, Tanveen Ishaque, Andrew Hallett, Gerald P Morris, Myra Coppage, John L Schmitz, Olga Timofeeva, Eszter Lázár-Molnár, Aiwen Zhang, Scott Krummey, Luis Hidalgo, Dorry L Segev, Anat R Tambur, Allan B Massie
{"title":"The Impact of HLA-DQαβ Heterodimer Mismatch on Living Donor Kidney Allograft Outcomes.","authors":"Olga Charnaya, Tanveen Ishaque, Andrew Hallett, Gerald P Morris, Myra Coppage, John L Schmitz, Olga Timofeeva, Eszter Lázár-Molnár, Aiwen Zhang, Scott Krummey, Luis Hidalgo, Dorry L Segev, Anat R Tambur, Allan B Massie","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005198","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HLA-DQ mismatch has been identified as a predictor of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody formation and antibody-mediated rejection. There are insufficient data to guide the incorporation of DQ mismatch into organ allocation decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a retrospective longitudinal cohort of adult living donor kidney transplant recipients from 11 centers across the United States for whom high-resolution class II typing was available. HLA-DQαβ heterodimer allele mismatch was quantified for all donor-recipient pairs, and outcome data were obtained through linkage with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 3916 donor-recipient pairs. Recipient characteristics were notable for a median age of 51 (38-61) y, primarily unsensitized, with 74.5% of the cohort having 0% calculated panel-reactive antibody, and 60.4% with private insurance, for a median follow-up time of 5.86 y. We found that the HLA-DQαβ allele and HLA-DR antigen mismatch were each individually associated with an increased hazard of all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] DQ = 1.03 1.14 1.28 ; aHR DR = 1.03 1.15 1.328 ), death-censored graft failure (aHR DQ = 1.01 1.19 1.40 ; aHR DR = 0.099 1.18 1.39 ), and rejection. Having 2 HLA-DQαβ allele mismatches further increased the hazard of rejection even when controlling for HLA-DR mismatch (aHR 1.03 1.68 2.74 ).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HLA-DQαβ allele mismatch predicted allograft rejection even when controlling for HLA-DR antigen mismatch and were both independently associated with increased risk of graft failure or rejection in adult living kidney transplant recipients. Given the strong burden of disease arising from the HLA-DQ antibody formation, we suggest that HLA-DQαβ should be prioritized over HLA-DR in donor selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"720-728"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-19DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005262
Alvaro Rojas-Peña
{"title":"Normothermic Ex Vivo Heart Preservation: Assessment of Graft Viability Prior to Transplantation.","authors":"Alvaro Rojas-Peña","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005262","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005262","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"e188-e189"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142547672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TransplantationPub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005294
Mary Ann Simpson, Ming Valerie Lin
{"title":"Frailty in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Serious Issue That Would Benefit From a Redefinition of \"Successful\" Intervention.","authors":"Mary Ann Simpson, Ming Valerie Lin","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005294","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005294","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"580-581"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Perioperative Management During Liver Transplantation: A National Survey From the French Special Interest Group in \"Liver Anesthesiology and Intensive Care\".","authors":"Pauline Devauchelle, Anne Bignon, Isaure Breteau, Mylène Defaye, Laurianne Degravi, Cyrielle Despres, Alexandre Godon, Renaud Guérin, Laurence Lavayssiere, Benjamin Lebas, Axelle Maurice, Clément Monet, Antoine Monsel, Laurent Reydellet, Stéphanie Roullet, Romain Rozier, Céline Guichon, Emmanuel Weiss","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005264","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative management practices in liver transplantation (LT) evolve very quickly. There are few specific recommendations, often based on a low level of evidence, resulting in wide heterogeneity of practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a survey in all 16 French centers in 2021 by focusing on center organization, preoperative cardiovascular assessment, antimicrobial prophylaxis, hemostasis management, intraoperative use of hemodynamic monitoring and renal replacement therapy, immunosuppression, and postoperative prevention of arterial complications and compared it with current recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The organization of perioperative LT care involved 1 single team throughout the perioperative LT process in 7 centers (43.7%). The coronary evaluation was systematic in one-third of the centers and guided by risk factors in the other centers. Antibiotic prophylaxis was strictly intraoperative in only 7 centers (44%). Antifungal prophylaxis targeting high-risk LT recipients was administered in 15 centers (93%). Intraoperative coagulation assessment was based on standard coagulation tests in 8 centers (50%), on viscoelastic assays in 4 centers (25%), and both methods in 4 centers (25%). Hemodynamic monitoring practices greatly varied between centers.Concerning immunosuppression, molecules and dosages were heterogeneous. Aspirin was systematically administered in one-third of cases (6 centers; 37.5%). Of the 21 recommendations tested, the concordance rate was 100% for 3 recommendations and <50% for 7 recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study precisely describes French practices regarding LT in perioperative care and highlights the paucity of data in this setting, leading to very weak recommendations that are poorly followed in LT centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"671-680"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}