Judicial Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour 坦率义务的司法新透视
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2267400
Cassandra Somers-Joce, Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin
{"title":"Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour","authors":"Cassandra Somers-Joce, Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2267400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2267400","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135883107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Public Law Climate Litigation: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and Australia 公法气候诉讼的发展趋势:英国与澳大利亚的比较分析
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2231320
James P. Barrett, Hannah Lau
{"title":"Trends in Public Law Climate Litigation: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and Australia","authors":"James P. Barrett, Hannah Lau","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2231320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2231320","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132306671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vox Populi or Vox Curiae? Some Possible Consequences of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organisation on Abortion in the European Court of Human Rights “人民之声”还是“人民之声”?欧洲人权法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织关于堕胎的一些可能后果
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2223456
James E. Hurford
{"title":"Vox Populi or Vox Curiae? Some Possible Consequences of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organisation on Abortion in the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2223456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2223456","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121454223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Begum Question: The Scope of Deprivation of Citizenship Appeals in Cases of Fraud 贝古姆问题:欺诈案件中剥夺公民权上诉的范围
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2272429
Edward Arash Abedian
{"title":"The Begum Question: The Scope of Deprivation of Citizenship Appeals in Cases of Fraud","authors":"Edward Arash Abedian","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2272429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2272429","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"164 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139364070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using the Duty of Candour as a Judicial Review Caseworker 司法审查个案工作者的坦率义务运用
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2218257
Gabriel Tan
{"title":"Using the Duty of Candour as a Judicial Review Caseworker","authors":"Gabriel Tan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2218257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2218257","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126169110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Analysis of the UK Government’s Closure of Schools in England in 2020 and 2021 – Part 2 英国政府在2020年和2021年关闭英格兰学校的法律分析-第2部分
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2218255
J. Maurici
{"title":"Legal Analysis of the UK Government’s Closure of Schools in England in 2020 and 2021 – Part 2","authors":"J. Maurici","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2218255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2218255","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134444791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Judicial Review of Public Data Gaps 公共数据缺口的司法审查
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2218256
J. Tomlinson, J. Meers, Cassie Somers-Joce
{"title":"Judicial Review of Public Data Gaps","authors":"J. Tomlinson, J. Meers, Cassie Somers-Joce","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2218256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2218256","url":null,"abstract":"1. The failure of public bodies to collect valuable data – what we call ‘data gaps’ – is a major problem of modern government. With government infrastructure becoming increasingly digitalised, the opportunities to collect data efficiently and at low cost are increasing exponentially. Yet, we often see public bodies making decisions which fail to capitalise on this opportunity. This may be for a range of reasons, and such failures can cause a range of serious problems. For public law practitioners, this is giving rise to an important question: are there routes to challenge decisions underpinning data gaps via judicial review?","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131197230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Judicial Review in the Tax Field: Not a Spent Force 税务领域的司法审查:没有用完的力量
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2215641
Dominic de Cogan
{"title":"Judicial Review in the Tax Field: Not a Spent Force","authors":"Dominic de Cogan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2215641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2215641","url":null,"abstract":"1. Concern about the width of tax authority powers and their effects on taxpayers is hardly confined to the UK or to modern times. Indeed, the relationship between the public imperatives of taxation (including revenue-raising, regulation and redistribution) and the private interests of taxpayers has long been deeply contentious not only in practical tax administration but also in constitutional and philosophical debates about taxation. Nevertheless, there is something distinctively worrying about the recent UK practice in which new statutory powers are conferred on HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in each annual Finance Bill, possibly as a way of demonstrating the government’s seriousness of purpose in tackling tax avoidance rather than because the powers are genuinely needed, and certainly without a consistent vision of what powers ought and ought not to be possessed by a tax authority. A number of investigations have been carried out by Parliamentary committees, research institutions and HMRC itself with a view to rationalising or at least reorganising HMRC’s powers, but these are typically overtaken by the conferral of even more powers. They have, in any case, not fully succeeded in fostering a culture of greater deliberation about how best to equip HMRC in carrying out its statutory functions of raising and managing taxes.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"20 S1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113978815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public Law in the Supreme Court 2020–2021 2020-2021年最高法院公法
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2200655
O. Jackson, Isabella Buono
{"title":"Public Law in the Supreme Court 2020–2021","authors":"O. Jackson, Isabella Buono","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2200655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2200655","url":null,"abstract":"1. After a two-year hiatus, the hit series ‘Public Law in the Supreme Court’ returns to Judicial Review. Its former authors, Christopher Knight and Tom Cross, have kindly passed the baton to us. We intend to adopt their tried-and-tested format by selecting our own idiosyncratic ‘ten most interesting public law judgments handed down by the Supreme Court in a legal year’ and summarising them for this journal.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124619128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Closed Material Procedures – Should They Be Expanded to Protect Sensitive Interests Other Than National Security? 保密材料程序——是否应该扩大到保护国家安全以外的敏感利益?
Judicial Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658
Karl Laird
{"title":"Closed Material Procedures – Should They Be Expanded to Protect Sensitive Interests Other Than National Security?","authors":"Karl Laird","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658","url":null,"abstract":"1. In November 2022 Sir Duncan Ouseley’s long-awaited report on the operation of closed material procedures (CMPs) under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (‘the JSA’) was published. Sir Duncan’s report examined various aspects of how the CMP regime operates in practice and made a number of recommendations which are intended to improve it. The report did not, however, consider whether CMPs should be used to protect not only the interests of national security, but also a wider range of sensitive interests, such as international relations. This article will consider whether there is a case to be made for expanding the definition of ‘sensitive material’ in s 6(11) of the JSA – which restricts CMPs only to material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security – to include a broader range of sensitive interests.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123143236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信