保密材料程序——是否应该扩大到保护国家安全以外的敏感利益?

Karl Laird
{"title":"保密材料程序——是否应该扩大到保护国家安全以外的敏感利益?","authors":"Karl Laird","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In November 2022 Sir Duncan Ouseley’s long-awaited report on the operation of closed material procedures (CMPs) under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (‘the JSA’) was published. Sir Duncan’s report examined various aspects of how the CMP regime operates in practice and made a number of recommendations which are intended to improve it. The report did not, however, consider whether CMPs should be used to protect not only the interests of national security, but also a wider range of sensitive interests, such as international relations. This article will consider whether there is a case to be made for expanding the definition of ‘sensitive material’ in s 6(11) of the JSA – which restricts CMPs only to material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security – to include a broader range of sensitive interests.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed Material Procedures – Should They Be Expanded to Protect Sensitive Interests Other Than National Security?\",\"authors\":\"Karl Laird\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. In November 2022 Sir Duncan Ouseley’s long-awaited report on the operation of closed material procedures (CMPs) under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (‘the JSA’) was published. Sir Duncan’s report examined various aspects of how the CMP regime operates in practice and made a number of recommendations which are intended to improve it. The report did not, however, consider whether CMPs should be used to protect not only the interests of national security, but also a wider range of sensitive interests, such as international relations. This article will consider whether there is a case to be made for expanding the definition of ‘sensitive material’ in s 6(11) of the JSA – which restricts CMPs only to material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security – to include a broader range of sensitive interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2200658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 2022年11月,邓肯·乌斯利爵士发布了期待已久的《2013年司法与安全法》(JSA)下的封闭材料程序(cmp)操作报告。邓肯爵士的报告检查了CMP制度在实践中如何运作的各个方面,并提出了一些旨在改进该制度的建议。然而,该报告没有考虑cmp是否应该不仅用于保护国家安全利益,还应用于保护更广泛的敏感利益,如国际关系。本文将考虑是否有理由扩大JSA第6(11)条中“敏感材料”的定义——该定义将cmp仅限于披露会损害国家安全利益的材料——以包括更广泛的敏感利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Closed Material Procedures – Should They Be Expanded to Protect Sensitive Interests Other Than National Security?
1. In November 2022 Sir Duncan Ouseley’s long-awaited report on the operation of closed material procedures (CMPs) under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (‘the JSA’) was published. Sir Duncan’s report examined various aspects of how the CMP regime operates in practice and made a number of recommendations which are intended to improve it. The report did not, however, consider whether CMPs should be used to protect not only the interests of national security, but also a wider range of sensitive interests, such as international relations. This article will consider whether there is a case to be made for expanding the definition of ‘sensitive material’ in s 6(11) of the JSA – which restricts CMPs only to material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security – to include a broader range of sensitive interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信