The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Patellar Tendinosis: A Follow-up Study of Surgical Treatment","authors":"A. Ferretti, F. Conteduca, Emanuela Camerucci, F. Morelli","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200212000-00009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200212000-00009","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patellar tendinopathy (jumper's knee) is an overuse syndrome that frequently affects athletes. A retrospective study was done to analyze the results at a minimum of five years after the performance of a surgical technique in competitive athletes.Methods: From 1985 to 1995, thirty-two patients (thirty-eight knees) affected by patellar tendinopathy were treated surgically after failure of nonoperative treatment. All knees were operated on by the same surgeon using the same surgical technique: longitudinal splitting of the tendon, excision of any abnormal tissue that was identified, and resection and drilling of the inferior pole of the patella. The results in twenty-seven patients (thirty-three knees), including twenty-two athletes (twenty-seven knees) who were still involved in sports activities (or wished to still be involved) at a competitive level at the time of final follow-up, were reviewed at a mean of eight years postoperatively. The results were evaluated according to symptoms and the ability to return to full sports activities.Results: The result was excellent in twenty-three knees (70%), good in five, fair in one, and poor in four at the time of the long-term follow-up. Eighty-two percent of the patients who tried to pursue sports at their preinjury level were able to do so, and 63% of those knees were totally symptom-free.Conclusions: The outcome of the described surgical treatment appears to be satisfactory; however, the results are less predictable in volleyball players.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"2179–2185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85874199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Synovial Entrapment: A Complication of Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"D. Pollock, D. Ammeen, G. Engh","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200212000-00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200212000-00008","url":null,"abstract":"Background: We observed a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty involving hypertrophy of tissue proximal to the patella associated with pain during active knee extension from 90° of flexion. The purpose of this paper was to describe synovial entrapment and to determine if design features of the prosthesis predispose patients to the complication.Methods: Between April 1990 and June 1999, we performed 459 consecutive posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasties using three prosthetic designs with different femoral intercondylar geometries. We identified twenty-six patients (twenty-seven knees) in whom arthroscopic débridement of the knee or open arthrotomy with débridement of the knee had been subsequently performed because of a diagnosis of synovial entrapment. We reviewed the records of these patients to identify the knee components that had been used and the symptoms and conditions that necessitated additional treatment.Results: Symptoms (grating, crepitation, and pain with active knee extension from 90°) necessitating subsequent débridement occurred in 13.5% (nineteen) of 141 knees treated with the Anatomic Modular Knee-Congruency implant, 3.8% (eight) of 212 treated with the Anatomic Modular Knee-Posterior Stabilized implant, and none of the 106 treated with the Press Fit Condylar Sigma-Posterior Stabilized implant. All patients had difficulty rising from a chair and climbing stairs; however, none had symptoms when standing or walking. No patient had a patellar clunk. The symptoms occurred at a mean of seven months after the arthroplasty in the patients with an Anatomic Modular Knee-Congruency implant and at a mean of twenty months after the arthroplasty in those with an Anatomic Modular Knee-Posterior Stabilized implant. Débridement of the frond-like hypertrophic synovial tissue at the distal aspect of the quadriceps tendon alleviated symptoms in all patients. No nodules were identified during the arthroscopy.Conclusions: Synovial entrapment is characterized by hypertrophic synovial tissue at the superior pole of the patella. Use of a posterior stabilized femoral component with a proximally positioned or wide femoral box is more likely to result in this complication.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"53 1","pages":"2174–2178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88265876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Osteolysis in Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Knees","authors":"Chun‐Hsiung Huang, Hon-Ming Ma, J. Liau, F. Ho, Cheng-Kung Cheng","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200212000-00015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200212000-00015","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Osteolysis is an important complication associated with total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of osteolysis after failed total knee arthroplasty with a mobile-bearing prosthesis and after failed arthroplasty with a fixed-bearing prosthesis.Methods: Eighty revision total knee arthroplasties performed between 1995 and 1998 were included in this study. All had radiographic evidence of advanced polyethylene wear. The mobile-bearing group consisted of thirty-four knees with a Low Contact Stress implant, and the fixed-bearing group included forty-six knees. The average time (and standard deviation) from the primary operation to the revision was 102.8 ± 26.5 months in the mobile-bearing group and 96.0 ± 30.1 months in the fixed-bearing group. The prerevision radiographs and operative findings were reviewed.Results: The prevalence of osteolysis was significantly higher in the mobile-bearing group (47%; sixteen of thirty-four knees) than in the fixed-bearing group (13%; six of forty-six knees) (p = 0.003). The distal part of the femur was involved in thirteen knees in the mobile-bearing group and in four knees in the fixed-bearing group. Seventeen knees had osteolysis in the posterior aspect of the femoral condyle, which was the most common site of osteolysis; however, twelve of them had no evidence of osteolysis on prerevision radiographs.Conclusions: The prevalence of osteolysis was higher in the knees with a mobile-bearing prosthesis than in those with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. The osteolysis was predominantly on the femoral side, adjacent to the posterior aspect of the condyle. Radiographic evaluation of osteolysis in the distal part of the femur may not be reliable and usually leads to an underestimation of the degree of osteolysis.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"85 1","pages":"2224–2229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78212679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radius Pull Test: Predictor of Longitudinal Forearm Instability","authors":"Adam M. Smith, Leah R Urbanosky, Jason A. Castle, J. Rushing, D. Ruch","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200211000-00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00010","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Longitudinal instability of the forearm (the Essex-Lopresti lesion) following radial head excision may be difficult to detect. This cadaveric study examines a stress test that can be performed in the operating room to identify injury to the ligamentous structures of the forearm.Methods: Twelve cadaveric upper extremities were randomized into two groups and underwent radial head resection. Group 1 underwent sequential transection of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the interosseous membrane. Group 2 underwent sequential transection of the interosseous membrane and the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Ulnar variance and radial migration were examined with use of fluoroscopy of the wrist before, during, and after the application of a 9.1-kg load via longitudinal traction on the proximal part of the radius.Results: Group 1 demonstrated no significant changes in proximal radial migration with load (compared with the findings after radial head resection alone) after transection of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. However, Group 2 demonstrated significant changes in proximal radial migration with load after transection of the interosseous membrane (p = 0.03; median, 3.5 mm). In both groups, transection of both the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the interosseous membrane resulted in significant changes in proximal radial migration with load (p = 0.001; median, 9.5 mm). When the load was removed, specimens were ulnar positive (median, 3.0 mm), with no specimen returning to the preload position of ulnar variance (p = 0.001).Conclusion: After radial head resection, 3 mm of proximal radial migration with longitudinal traction indicated disruption of the interosseous membrane. In all specimens, proximal radial migration of ≥6 mm with load indicated gross longitudinal instability with disruption of all ligamentous structures of the forearm.Clinical Relevance: Early detection of longitudinal instability of the forearm is essential for successful management. If radial head resection is necessary, longitudinal traction on the proximal part of the radius may provide useful information regarding the ligamentous support of the forearm and assist in deciding whether to simply excise or to repair or replace the radial head.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"1970–1976"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88223521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Anatomy of Tibial Eminence Fractures: Arthroscopic Observations Following Failed Closed Reduction","authors":"Joseph Lowe, G. Chaimsky, A. Freedman, I. Zion, C. Howard","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200211000-00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00004","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Failed manipulative reduction of avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament has been attributed to interposition of soft tissues, particularly the anterior horn of the medial meniscus. The objectives of the present report were (1) to show that the failure to reduce Meyers and McKeever type-III tibial eminence fractures was not due to interposition of soft tissues and (2) to discuss the relevance of the finding that the anterior third of the lateral meniscus was attached to the avulsed anterior cruciate ligament insertion site in all patients studied.Methods: Twelve patients who had had a failed manipulative reduction of a type-III tibial eminence fracture underwent arthroscopic reduction and fixation of the avulsed fragment.Results: A number of consistent findings were noted. The avulsed intercondylar eminence was displaced superiorly into the intercondylar notch. Attached to this fragment was not only the anterior cruciate ligament, but also, in all cases, the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The anterior third of the lateral meniscus had been torn from its tibial attachment and displaced together with the osseous fragment into the intercondylar notch. No interposition of bone or soft tissue was observed. Reduction of the osseous fragment was facilitated by traction on, or sutures passed around, the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Standard fixation methods were utilized.Conclusions: The concept that avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament cannot be reduced by manipulation because of soft-tissue interposition was not supported by the findings of the present study. The attachment of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the avulsed tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament may not be an irrelevant incidental finding. The observation that the displaced osseous fragment was attached simultaneously to the anterior cruciate ligament and to the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, both pulling in different directions, may explain why type-III tibial eminence fractures are irreducible by manipulation.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"1933–1938"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83423258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Three and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus","authors":"A. J. Wijgman, W. Roolker, T. Patt, E. Raaymakers, R. Marti","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200211000-00002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00002","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Controversy persists concerning the preferred treatment of displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the results of open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus and the functional limitations of patients in whom avascular necrosis of the humeral head develops as a complication of this fracture.Methods: We assessed the intermediate and long-term results for sixty patients with a three or four-part fracture of the proximal part of the humerus who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation with cerclage wires or a T-plate. The Constant score and a visual analog score for pain were calculated, and radiographs of the proximal part of the humerus were evaluated.Results: After an average of ten years of follow-up, fifty-two patients (87%) had a good or excellent result on the basis of the Constant score whereas eight patients (13%) had a poor result. Fifty-one patients (85%) were satisfied with the result at the time of the most recent examination. Twenty-two patients (37%) had development of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, and seventeen (77%) of these twenty-two patients had a good or excellent Constant score.Conclusions: Open reduction and internal fixation with cerclage wires or a T-plate yields good functional results in most patients. This option should be considered even for patients with fracture-dislocation patterns that are associated with a high risk for avascular necrosis of the humeral head, as this complication did not preclude a good result.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"56 1","pages":"1919–1925"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76634623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anconeus Arthroplasty: A New Technique for Reconstruction of the Radiocapitellar and/or Proximal Radioulnar Joint","authors":"B. Morrey, A. Schneeberger","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200211000-00009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00009","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Management of posttraumatic radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint dysfunction and pain is a challenging problem, often with more than one pathological feature, and to date there are no consistently reliable solutions. The unreliability of prosthetic replacement prompted us to develop an anconeus arthroplasty wherein the anconeus muscle is rotated into the radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint.Methods: Three interposition options were assessed in our laboratory and were employed clinically: interposition at the radiocapitellar joint (Type I), interposition at the radiocapitellar and proximal radioulnar joints (Type II), and proximal radioulnar interposition (wrap) (Type III). The clinical outcomes in fourteen patients who had been treated with one of the three types of anconeus interposition arthroplasty were reviewed at least two years (mean, 6.1 years) postoperatively.Results: Anatomic dissection of twenty-five specimens revealed that all three applications were possible. Of the fourteen patients, twelve (all six with a Type-I interposition, three of the five with a Type-II interposition, and all three with a Type-III interposition) had a satisfactory overall subjective result. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score averaged 63 points before the surgery and 89 points after it.Conclusions: Anconeus interpositional arthroplasty offers a reasonable likelihood of improved subjective and objective function in patients with the challenging problem of radiocapitellar and/or proximal radioulnar joint dysfunction and pain after trauma, even when there is Essex-Lopresti axial instability.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"1960–1969"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90539107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients","authors":"S. Stulberg, P. Loan, V. Sarin","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200200002-00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200200002-00011","url":null,"abstract":"The success of total knee replacement surgery depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, appropriate implant design, correct surgical technique, and effective perioperative care. The outcome of total knee replacement surgery is particularly sensitive to variations in surgical technique 1-9. Incorrect positioning or orientation of the implant and improper alignment of the limb can lead to accelerated implant wear and loosening as well as suboptimal functional performance. A number of studies have suggested that alignment errors of >3° are associated with more rapid failure and less satisfactory functional results after total knee arthroplasty 1,10-20. Recent studies have also emphasized that the most common cause for revision total knee replacement is error in surgical technique.\u0000\u0000Mechanical alignment guides have improved the accuracy with which implants can be inserted. Although mechanical alignment systems are continually being refined, errors in implant and limb alignment continue to occur. It has been estimated that errors in tibial and femoral alignment of >3° occur in at least 10% of total knee arthroplasties, even when performed by experienced surgeons using mechanical alignment systems of modern design. Mechanical alignment systems have fundamental problems that limit their ultimate accuracy. The accuracy of preoperative planning is limited by the errors inherent in standard radiographs. It is difficult to determine accurately, with standard instrumentation, the correct location of crucial alignment landmarks (e.g., the center of the femoral head, the center of the ankle). Moreover, mechanical alignment and sizing devices presume a standardized bone geometry that may not apply to a specific patient. Even the most elaborate mechanical instrumentation systems rely on visual inspection to confirm the accuracy of limb and implant alignment and stability at the conclusion of the total knee replacement procedure.\u0000\u0000Computer-based alignment systems have been developed to address the …","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"S90–S98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89346266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What's New in Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"M. Huo","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200509000-00029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200509000-00029","url":null,"abstract":"There were numerous papers, abstracts, and presentations on the topic of adult hip reconstructive surgery during the past year. I elected to review the published articles from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume), Journal of Arthroplasty, and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. In addition, I reviewed all of the abstracts from major meetings focusing on hip reconstructive surgery, including the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the annual meeting of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, and the open meeting of the Hip Society. I also reviewed several abstracts from the meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society. The time-interval for the review was June 2001 to April 2002. The review involved more than 165 papers and 250 abstracts. I have organized the data into eight categories: (1) results of primary total hip arthroplasty, (2) results of revision total hip arthroplasty, (3) outcome measures, (4) metal ion release, (5) implant liability, (6) osteolysis, bone-remodeling, and bearing surface, (7) osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and (8) complications. Last year’s review included extensive data regarding the clinical results of a variety of surgical techniques, disease entities, and associated complications. In the current review, I have focused principally on newer data that were presented over the past year.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":"1894–1905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88163561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dislocation After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Treatment Options","authors":"G. Alberton, W. High, B. Morrey","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200210000-00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200210000-00008","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dislocation is a leading and underemphasized cause of failure in revision total hip arthroplasty. Although this fact is generally well recognized, we are aware of no detailed assessments of this problem to date. Our purpose therefore was to evaluate the risk factors leading to instability after revision as well as the expected outcome of various treatment strategies. Methods: Data were obtained from 1548 revision arthroplasties in 1405 patients who were followed for a minimum of two years (range, 2.0 to 16.4 years; mean, 8.1 years) or until dislocation occurred. Revisions specifically performed because of instability were excluded from the analysis. Risk factors were recorded along with treatment strategies and their success. The statistical relevance of both sets of variables was calculated. Results: A dislocation occurred after 115 (7.4%) of 1548 revision hip arthroplasties. The use of an elevated rim liner was associated with significant decreases (p < 0.05) in dislocation following revision of femoral and acetabular components. The presence of trochanteric nonunion was a significant risk factor for subsequent dislocation (p < 0.001). Revisions with 32-mm and 28-mm-diameter femoral heads were both more stable than was revision with a 22-mm-diameter head (p < 0.05 for each). Surgery was the initial treatment for twelve of the 115 dislocations. Six of the twelve hips had no further instability. Of the 103 postoperative dislocations initially managed nonoperatively, only thirty-six did not redislocate. Thirty-eight of the sixty-seven hips that had an additional dislocation after closed treatment had repeat surgery for treatment of the instability. Only eleven of the thirty-eight hips were stable at one year after surgery. Overall, at the time of the final assessment, sixty-five (57%) of the 115 hips were stable, forty-one (36%) remained unstable, and the status of nine (8%) was unknown. Conclusions: The risk factors for instability after a total hip revision are not the same as those after a primary procedure. The extent of the soft-tissue dissection is probably the most important variable since head size and trochanteric nonunion are related to \"soft-tissue tension.\" Modular acetabular components with an elevated rim help to stabilize a hip undergoing a revision procedure.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"1788–1792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88536710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}