Tension Band Wiring Versus Precontoured Plate Fixation for 2-Part and Multifragmented Olecranon Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Kaare Sourin Midtgaard,Gunnar Birkeland Flugsrud,Kenneth B Jonsson,Greta Snellman,Marius Coucheron,Ane Djuv,Dag Grundel,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Espen Laudal,Knut Erik Mjaaland,Tor Nicolaysen,Jan Erik Madsen,Frede Frihagen,
{"title":"Tension Band Wiring Versus Precontoured Plate Fixation for 2-Part and Multifragmented Olecranon Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.","authors":"Kaare Sourin Midtgaard,Gunnar Birkeland Flugsrud,Kenneth B Jonsson,Greta Snellman,Marius Coucheron,Ane Djuv,Dag Grundel,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Espen Laudal,Knut Erik Mjaaland,Tor Nicolaysen,Jan Erik Madsen,Frede Frihagen, ","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the outcomes of tension band wiring and precontoured plate fixation for the treatment of 2-part and multifragmented isolated, displaced olecranon fractures.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe recruited 200 patients, 18 to 75 years of age, who had isolated, displaced olecranon fractures and randomly allocated them to tension band wiring (n = 100) or plate fixation (n = 100). The patients were followed at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial. The primary outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score at 12 months.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMore patients in the tension band wiring group were classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I; otherwise, the randomization groups were similar. Two patients in the tension band wiring group and 3 in the plate fixation group did not receive the allocated treatment. The duration of the surgical procedure was 64 and 88 minutes in the tension band wiring and plate fixation groups, respectively (p < 0.01). After 12 months, the median QuickDASH score was 5 for both groups, and the median of the differences was 0 (95% 1-sided confidence interval [CI], 2.3). There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups at any time point. In addition, there were no differences in outcomes in subgroup analyses of 2-part and multifragmented olecranon fractures. Complications and secondary surgical procedures were analyzed on the basis of the treatment received (tension band wiring = 101 patients, plate fixation = 99 patients). Sixty-four complications were recorded in 52 patients (tension band wiring, 30 patients; plate fixation, 22 patients; relative risk [RR], 1.20 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.58]; p = 0.23). In the tension band wiring and plate fixation groups, 49 and 34 patients (RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.74]; p = 0.04) required at least 1 additional surgical procedure, respectively. Hardware-related irritation was the most reported indication of secondary surgery.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWhen treating isolated, displaced 2-part and multifragmented olecranon fractures, tension band wiring was noninferior compared with plate fixation. The surgical procedure was quicker for tension band wiring, but the frequency of secondary surgical procedures was higher. The majority of secondary surgical procedures were removal of symptomatic hardware.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the outcomes of tension band wiring and precontoured plate fixation for the treatment of 2-part and multifragmented isolated, displaced olecranon fractures. METHODS We recruited 200 patients, 18 to 75 years of age, who had isolated, displaced olecranon fractures and randomly allocated them to tension band wiring (n = 100) or plate fixation (n = 100). The patients were followed at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial. The primary outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score at 12 months. RESULTS More patients in the tension band wiring group were classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I; otherwise, the randomization groups were similar. Two patients in the tension band wiring group and 3 in the plate fixation group did not receive the allocated treatment. The duration of the surgical procedure was 64 and 88 minutes in the tension band wiring and plate fixation groups, respectively (p < 0.01). After 12 months, the median QuickDASH score was 5 for both groups, and the median of the differences was 0 (95% 1-sided confidence interval [CI], 2.3). There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups at any time point. In addition, there were no differences in outcomes in subgroup analyses of 2-part and multifragmented olecranon fractures. Complications and secondary surgical procedures were analyzed on the basis of the treatment received (tension band wiring = 101 patients, plate fixation = 99 patients). Sixty-four complications were recorded in 52 patients (tension band wiring, 30 patients; plate fixation, 22 patients; relative risk [RR], 1.20 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.58]; p = 0.23). In the tension band wiring and plate fixation groups, 49 and 34 patients (RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.74]; p = 0.04) required at least 1 additional surgical procedure, respectively. Hardware-related irritation was the most reported indication of secondary surgery. CONCLUSIONS When treating isolated, displaced 2-part and multifragmented olecranon fractures, tension band wiring was noninferior compared with plate fixation. The surgical procedure was quicker for tension band wiring, but the frequency of secondary surgical procedures was higher. The majority of secondary surgical procedures were removal of symptomatic hardware. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
张力带钢丝与预塑形钢板固定治疗鹰嘴两部分多碎片骨折:一项前瞻性随机试验。
背景:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较张力带钢丝和预轮廓钢板固定治疗2部分和多碎片孤立、移位的鹰嘴骨折的效果。方法我们招募了200例18 ~ 75岁的鹰嘴孤立移位骨折患者,随机分配张力带钢丝组(n = 100)和钢板固定组(n = 100)。随访时间分别为6周、12周、12个月、24个月。该研究设计为非劣效性试验。主要结局指标是12个月时手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)评分。结果张力带钢丝组有更多患者被评为ASA(美国麻醉师学会)I级;除此之外,随机分组相似。张力带钢丝组2例,钢板固定组3例未按规定治疗。张力带钢丝组和钢板固定组手术时间分别为64分钟和88分钟(p < 0.01)。12个月后,两组的QuickDASH评分中位数为5,差异中位数为0(95%单侧置信区间[CI], 2.3)。两组在任何时间点均无临床相关差异。此外,两段式鹰嘴骨折和多段式鹰嘴骨折的亚组分析结果也没有差异。根据所接受的治疗,分析并发症及二次手术方法(张力带钢丝101例,钢板固定99例)。52例出现64例并发症(张力带钢丝30例;钢板固定22例;相对危险度[RR], 1.20 [95% CI, 0.88 ~ 1.58];P = 0.23)。张力带钢丝组和钢板固定组分别为49例和34例(RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.01 ~ 1.74];P = 0.04)分别需要至少1次额外手术。硬件相关刺激是二次手术最常见的指征。结论张力带内固定治疗孤立、移位、多碎片性鹰嘴骨折优于钢板内固定。张力带连接的手术速度更快,但二次手术的频率更高。大多数二次手术是去除有症状的硬体。证据级别:治疗性i级。参见《作者说明》获得证据级别的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信