ERN: National Security & War (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Copying and Learning from Outsiders? Assessing Diffusion from Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars 抄袭和向外人学习?评估车臣战争中跨国叛乱分子的扩散
ERN: National Security & War (Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139179089.005
Kristin M. Bakke
{"title":"Copying and Learning from Outsiders? Assessing Diffusion from Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars","authors":"Kristin M. Bakke","doi":"10.1017/CBO9781139179089.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139179089.005","url":null,"abstract":"Transnational terrorism is presumed to both foster and feed on intrastate conflicts. Yet few studies have examined the ways in which transnational insurgents — be they terrorists or not — matter. This article theorizes and traces the diffusion mechanisms through which transnational insurgents affect domestic challengers to the state, drawing on the literatures on transnationalism, social movements, and intrastate conflicts. Via mediated or relational diffusion, transnational insurgents can engender learning or emulation on the part of the domestic insurgents, in turn shaping domestic processes of mobilization — shifts in framing of a movement’s goals, tactical innovation, and resource mobilization. The argument is anchored in an empirical analysis of the Chechen wars.","PeriodicalId":224499,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125463714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53
Human Rights Thinking and the Laws of War 人权思想与战争法
ERN: National Security & War (Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316481103.003
D. Luban
{"title":"Human Rights Thinking and the Laws of War","authors":"D. Luban","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316481103.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316481103.003","url":null,"abstract":"In a significant early case, the ICTY commented: “The essence of the whole corpus of international humanitarian law as well as human rights law lies in the protection of the human dignity of every person… The general principle of respect for human dignity is... the very raison d'etre of international humanitarian law and human rights law.”Is it true that international humanitarian law and international human rights law share the same “essence,” and that essence is the general principle of respect for human dignity? Is it true that, in the words of Charles Beitz, humanitarian law is “perhaps better described as the law of ‘human rights in armed conflicts’”? To answer yes, I argue, amounts to a reinterpretation of IHL that drifts far from its history. This reinterpretation is what I label human rights thinking (to distinguish it from doctrinal specifics). In its origins, IHL was not designed to protect human dignity, but to reduce human suffering; it was a form of disaster relief. Human rights law, by contrast, originated as a blueprint for the kind of peacetime societies that would no longer plunge the world into what the UN Charter calls the “untold sorrow” of war.Nevertheless, law changes. Perhaps the nature of IHL has evolved over time in the direction of human rights thinking, and should evolve that way. That is the view I defend – with some qualifications – in the final sections of this essay. First, I explore the very different genealogies of IHL and human rights law, and explain how human rights thinking migrated into IHL. I attribute the migration to international criminal law, military occupations, and reactions to the U.S. war on terrorism. In the final sections, I explore two ways human rights thinking can be pursued in wars. One of them, I will argue, overplays and overestimates what human rights thinking can accomplish. It does so by, in effect, willing away fundamental differences between war and peace. The other is an approach that I have defended for more than three decades. It consists, at bottom, of taking a civilian’s-eye view of the disasters of war and reading the law accordingly – recognizing, one might say, that Mother Courage and her children matter just as much to the law of war as Henry V and his band of brothers.","PeriodicalId":224499,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National Security & War (Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124710377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信