Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology最新文献_第10页

Augustine’s Eschatological Vision: The Dynamism of Seeing and Seeking God in Heaven 奥古斯丁的末世观:在天堂看到和寻求上帝的动力

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1177/1063851219886590

Alexander H. Pierce

引用次数: 0

Ecclesial Visibility as a Byproduct of Discipleship: Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Understanding of the Visible Church and Its Ecumenical Implications 作为门徒的副产品的教会可见性:迪特里希·邦霍费尔对可见教会及其普世意义的理解

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1177/1063851219891533

Cole Christian Jodon

引用次数: 0

Corrigendum to Preaching in the Context of the Eucharist: A Patristic Perspective 圣体圣事中讲道的更正:教父的观点

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1177/1063851219879524

引用次数: 0

Luther’s Theologian of the Cross and Theologian of Glory Distinction Reconsidered 路德的十字架神学家和荣耀神学家的重新思考

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-04-19 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220914005

Christopher D. Jackson

引用次数: 0

Myth and Phenomena: Introducing John the Theologian 神话与现象:神学家约翰简介

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-04-13 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220906432

Paul Saieg

{"title":"Myth and Phenomena: Introducing John the Theologian","authors":"Paul Saieg","doi":"10.1177/1063851220906432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220906432","url":null,"abstract":"On a crisp fall day of a New York October in 2014, I remember a dark espresso, a bright morning of warm hospitality, and an excited Fr. John Behr showing me his fresh insight into the structure of John’s Prologue and talking about what he thought it might mean for theology. The few seeds John had just then found have since matured and grown into a new proposal, not just for how to read the Gospel, but for how to take up the task of theology itself. In order to understand and evaluate this proposal, a group of eminent scholars in each of the several disciplines Behr traverses in this difficult book have graciously offered their reflections and evaluations of its strengths, weaknesses, and impact for the field. In this symposium, Harold Attridge evaluates Behr’s engagement with contemporary biblical scholarship in his exegesis of the Gospel; Paul Blowers takes the book’s measure as a historical theologian; Fr. Andrew Louth assesses Behr’s arguments about the figure of John in the early history of Christianity and the Gospel in the liturgy (as well as Behr’s place among Orthodox theologians); Charles Stang draws out the deep connection between Behr’s three concluding proposals and the influence of Origen (whose On First Principles Behr has recently edited and translated), offering some tentative, if beautifully drawn, theological “worries” of his own; and Fr. Olivier-Thomas Venard analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of Behr’s use of French phenomenology in his approaches to both Scripture and theology. Because of the book’s incredible breadth—working properly across the fields of biblical studies, patristics, and contemporary phenomenology—we are grateful to these scholars for offering their experience and expertise to help the rest of us critically understand what it is Behr has achieved, where he has","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131171235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On Flesh and Words 论血肉与语言

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-04-13 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220906512

O. Venard

引用次数: 0

The Sensus Literalis and the Trinity in the English Enlightenment 英国启蒙运动中的字面感觉论和三位一体论

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-03-11 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220910502

David Ney

引用次数: 0

Leaven without Loss: Church and World across Balthasar’s Corpus 没有损失的酵:横跨巴尔萨萨语料库的教会与世界

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-03-03 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220909050

J. Wood

引用次数: 1

David Elliot, Hope and Christian Ethics 大卫·艾略特，《希望与基督教伦理》

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-02-27 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220908143

John Jalsevac

{"title":"David Elliot, Hope and Christian Ethics","authors":"John Jalsevac","doi":"10.1177/1063851220908143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220908143","url":null,"abstract":"Toward the end of Hope and Christian Ethics, David Elliot bestows upon a fellow scholar (a certain Dominic Doyle) a compliment that, it strikes me, is felicitous if applied reflexively. “[I]n contrast to much Thomist scholarship,” Elliot writes, Doyle demonstrates a knack for translating “Aquinas out of inhouse scholastic language” so as the better “to engage questions of widespread and obvious interest” (p. 189). Elliot’s compliment, however, comes with a proviso. Doyle, it turns out, attempted a somewhat daring development of Aquinas’s account of hope by which Elliot—for good reason, it would seem— is unconvinced. Elliot’s study, on the other hand, takes as architectonic a rigorously faithful rendering of Thomas Aquinas’ treatment of hope as found in the Summa theologiae. For all that, however, Elliot’s Thomism hasn’t a whiff of the parochial or pedantic. On the contrary, in his hands Aquinas feels uncannily contemporary, speaking presciently to the moods and pathologies afflicting our fevered age. For Aquinas, the common thread uniting all forms of hope is that their object is a future good “possible but arduous to attain” (ST II-II 17.1). In the case of theological hope, this possible but arduous object is, quite simply, God. What differentiates hope from charity is that whereas the object of charity is God for God’s own sake, the object of hope is God “qua one’s own good or beatitude” (p. 65). As might be expected, Aquinas posits two opposed vices: despair and presumption. Accordingly, in Elliot’s book we get one chapter on each of these (Chapter 4 on presumption, and 5 on despair). We also receive treatments of the beatitude that Aquinas associates with hope—“Blessed are the poor in spirit”—as well as the associated gift of the Holy Spirit—fear. 908143 PRE0010.1177/1063851220908143Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"13 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120925665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Stephen O Presley, The Intertextual Reception of Genesis 1–3 in Irenaeus of Lyons Stephen O Presley，里昂Irenaeus的《创世纪1-3的互文接受》

Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Pub Date : 2020-02-24 DOI: 10.1177/1063851220907982

D. Driver

{"title":"Stephen O Presley, The Intertextual Reception of Genesis 1–3 in Irenaeus of Lyons","authors":"D. Driver","doi":"10.1177/1063851220907982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220907982","url":null,"abstract":"Irenaeus of Lyons is known as an early Christian apologist and theologian of creation. He has also been called the first biblical theologian. All of these elements are in view in Stephen Presley’s The Intertextual Reception of Genesis 1–3 in Irenaeus of Lyons (Leiden: Brill, 2015). A revision of his PhD at the University of St. Andrews, completed under the supervision of Mark Elliott, the study also pays a debt to D. Jeffrey Bingham, both as the teacher who first helped Presley conceive of the project and as the editor who brought it to print in Brill’s The Bible in Ancient Christianity series. It is easy enough to find accounts of Irenaeus that focus on his anti-Gnostic polemic. Such accounts seem bound to call “problematic” his description of the Ebionites, Marcion, Valentinus, and others. It is also common to see the spotlight trained on Irenaeus the trinitarian theologian. Both accounts tend to prioritize his proto-creedal commitments over his exegetical operations. Either way, whether one is thinking of Irenaeus and the heretics or Irenaeus and the scriptures, it can be difficult to avoid the impression that his work is important for some reason other than his ability to read well. The great value of Presley’s study, which builds on two earlier monographs on the use of Genesis in Irenaeus, is its exhaustive description of precisely how Genesis 1–3 functions across all five books of Adversus haereses. Irenaeus is given his due as an apologist, with acknowledged limitations, and as a theologian, especially of creation, but it is his handling of scripture that takes center stage. Presley treats “every verifiable echo, allusion, and citation of Gen 1–3” in Haer., together with the scriptural intertexts that are drawn into the orbit of Gen 1–3 (pp. 5, 241). On this account, Irenaeus emerges as a biblically minded theologian of creation whose handling of Christian scripture is marked by hermeneutical complexity and sophistication. 907982 PRE0010.1177/1063851220907982Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theologybook review book-review2020","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121033178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0