Russian Journal of Legal Studies最新文献_第9页

Forms of Implementation of the Judiciary in Criminal Proceeding in the Context of the Procedural Status of the Courtas a Participant in Criminal Proceeding 从法院参与刑事诉讼的程序地位看司法在刑事诉讼中的执行形式

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-15 DOI: 10.17816/rjls18388

P. Lutsenko, А ЛуценкоП

{"title":"Forms of Implementation of the Judiciary in Criminal Proceeding in the Context of the Procedural Status of the Courtas a Participant in Criminal Proceeding","authors":"P. Lutsenko, А ЛуценкоП","doi":"10.17816/rjls18388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18388","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the procedural status of the court as a participant of criminal proceedings taking into account the specifics of its legal position and the functions to be implemented. The legal status of the court in criminal proceedings by the absence of public or personal interest in the outcome of the criminal case, which not only predetermines the adversarial form of the proceedings, but also guarantees the independence of the judicial authorities in the exercise of justice. The author concludes that the concept of «court» is collective, since on the one hand it is a state institution entering the judicial system, on the other hand - the judge is the bearer of power, considering the criminal case on the merits and decisions provided by law.The judicial system has a sign of instancionnosti, due to its internal hierarchical structure. The existence of judicial bodies predetermines the movement of criminal proceedings, is a structural mechanism for the implementation of the function of internal judicial control and supervision, and also protects the rights and legitimate interests of participants in the criminal Legal proceedings and other interested persons. The powers of the court are considered from the standpoint of the functional criterion, namely: the resolution of the criminal case on the merits; monitoring of the activities of the preliminary investigation bodies; consideration of complaints on actions (inaction) and decisions of officials, conducting proceedings in a criminal case; response to violations of the rights and freedoms of citizens, the principle of legality, established circumstances, which contributed to the commission of a crime by making a private determination or decision, in the course of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132442518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Review: Tymofeyeva A. Non-Governmental Organisations under the European Convention on Human Rights: Exceptional Legal Standing. Monografie. RWW Science and New Media Passau-Berlin-Prague, 2015 338 p. ISBN 978-3-9816855-9-6 审查:Tymofeyeva A.《欧洲人权公约》下的非政府组织:特殊法律地位》。Monografie。RWW科学与新媒体帕索-柏林-布拉格，2015 338 p. ISBN 978-3-9816855-9-6

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.58

引用次数: 0

Computer Сrimes as a Part of Information Crime in Russia: Problems of Counteraction 计算机Сrimes作为俄罗斯信息犯罪的一部分:反制问题

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.49

引用次数: 0

Provision of Agricultural Land Law in Vietnam: Reality and Petition for Changes 越南农用地法律规定:现实与变更请愿

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.40

引用次数: 1

Sexual Violence against Minors in the Criminal Legislation of the Republic of Serbia 塞尔维亚共和国刑事立法中对未成年人的性暴力

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.22

引用次数: 0

On the Legal Status of Medicinal Products in the EU and the UK 药品在欧盟和英国的法律地位

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.3

引用次数: 0

Overview of Different Approaches to GMO Legislation 转基因生物立法的不同途径概述

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.10

引用次数: 0

The Impact of International Information Security on the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination 国际信息安全对人民行使自决权的影响

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI: 10.13187/rjls.2018.1.30

引用次数: 0

Legitimation, Legitimacy and Legality of Law in the Chinese Legal System 中国法制中的法律正当性、正当性与合法性

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI: 10.17816/rjls18416

N. Malysheva, И МалышеваН

{"title":"Legitimation, Legitimacy and Legality of Law in the Chinese Legal System","authors":"N. Malysheva, И МалышеваН","doi":"10.17816/rjls18416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18416","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the problems of legitimation, legitimacy and legality of law in the light of the Chinese legal system. It is noted that the above theoretical and legal categories, which have been developed in the framework of various types of legal understanding, need serious clarification, taking into account the peculiarities of the Chinese political and legal reality. From the historical point of view attention is being paid to Confucianism and Legalism, which have laid the foundations of the Chinese legal tradition and are influencing China’s law system until now. The author is examining the possibility of further updating the ancient Chinese concept of the «Heaven mandate» in modern conditions. A significant place in the article is devoted to analyzing the role of the Chinese Communist Party in giving legitimacy to the legal norms established by the legislator. The author analyses the legal nature of the program documents of the Communist Party of China, emphasizes the existence of the suggestive elements of legitimization of laws being adopted in China. In conclusion the article focuses on the process of legitimization of one of the Constellations of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, which abolished the terms limits of the Chairman of the People’s Republic of China, and it sums up that the constitutional amendment was legal from the formal point of view.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115141615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Legitimacy, Recognition, Validity and Abolition of Legal Norms in Legal Usage 法律适用中法律规范的合法性、承认、效力与废止

Russian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI: 10.17816/rjls18411

M. Antonov

{"title":"Legitimacy, Recognition, Validity and Abolition of Legal Norms in Legal Usage","authors":"M. Antonov","doi":"10.17816/rjls18411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18411","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper has as its object the investigation into meanings of propositions about legitimacy of law and their possible conceptual interconnection with propositions about validity of law. The paper analyzes the genesis of the legitimacy discourse in law, the criteria of recognition in law and their significance for defeasibility of particular norms of law as a way of «delegitimating» these norms. The author examines whether and under which circumstances binding force of law can be dependent on legitimacy of law and on recognition of law by its addressees. The author points out at some conceptual problems that arise in the connection with discussions about the recognition of law considered as a foundation of its binding force. Different meanings of the concepts of legitimacy and recognition in legal parlance are analyzed, as well as various situations in which a proposition about legitimacy of a legal norm or of a legal system might have effect on validity of such a norm or a system. It is underscored that an indiscriminate use of the concept “legitimacy” in propositions about validity of legal norms can result in violations of such norms by their addressees because of the alleged illegitimacy of these norms. The variety of meanings of the expression «legitimacy of law» requires from lawyers to be critical and to assume responsibility against attempts to deny validity of legal norms because of their supposed illegitimacy, what is not a rare situation in such branches of law as international or constitutional law. Otherwise, language games with ambiguous notions might result in unjustified denial of binding force of norms of public law and, consequently, in undermining the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125946419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0