Forms of Implementation of the Judiciary in Criminal Proceeding in the Context of the Procedural Status of the Courtas a Participant in Criminal Proceeding

P. Lutsenko, А ЛуценкоП
{"title":"Forms of Implementation of the Judiciary in Criminal Proceeding in the Context of the Procedural Status of the Courtas a Participant in Criminal Proceeding","authors":"P. Lutsenko, А ЛуценкоП","doi":"10.17816/rjls18388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the procedural status of the court as a participant of criminal proceedings taking into account the specifics of its legal position and the functions to be implemented. The legal status of the court in criminal proceedings by the absence of public or personal interest in the outcome of the criminal case, which not only predetermines the adversarial form of the proceedings, but also guarantees the independence of the judicial authorities in the exercise of justice. The author concludes that the concept of «court» is collective, since on the one hand it is a state institution entering the judicial system, on the other hand - the judge is the bearer of power, considering the criminal case on the merits and decisions provided by law.The judicial system has a sign of instancionnosti, due to its internal hierarchical structure. The existence of judicial bodies predetermines the movement of criminal proceedings, is a structural mechanism for the implementation of the function of internal judicial control and supervision, and also protects the rights and legitimate interests of participants in the criminal Legal proceedings and other interested persons. The powers of the court are considered from the standpoint of the functional criterion, namely: the resolution of the criminal case on the merits; monitoring of the activities of the preliminary investigation bodies; consideration of complaints on actions (inaction) and decisions of officials, conducting proceedings in a criminal case; response to violations of the rights and freedoms of citizens, the principle of legality, established circumstances, which contributed to the commission of a crime by making a private determination or decision, in the course of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the procedural status of the court as a participant of criminal proceedings taking into account the specifics of its legal position and the functions to be implemented. The legal status of the court in criminal proceedings by the absence of public or personal interest in the outcome of the criminal case, which not only predetermines the adversarial form of the proceedings, but also guarantees the independence of the judicial authorities in the exercise of justice. The author concludes that the concept of «court» is collective, since on the one hand it is a state institution entering the judicial system, on the other hand - the judge is the bearer of power, considering the criminal case on the merits and decisions provided by law.The judicial system has a sign of instancionnosti, due to its internal hierarchical structure. The existence of judicial bodies predetermines the movement of criminal proceedings, is a structural mechanism for the implementation of the function of internal judicial control and supervision, and also protects the rights and legitimate interests of participants in the criminal Legal proceedings and other interested persons. The powers of the court are considered from the standpoint of the functional criterion, namely: the resolution of the criminal case on the merits; monitoring of the activities of the preliminary investigation bodies; consideration of complaints on actions (inaction) and decisions of officials, conducting proceedings in a criminal case; response to violations of the rights and freedoms of citizens, the principle of legality, established circumstances, which contributed to the commission of a crime by making a private determination or decision, in the course of criminal proceedings.
从法院参与刑事诉讼的程序地位看司法在刑事诉讼中的执行形式
本文考虑到法院法律地位的具体情况和将执行的职能,审查了法院作为刑事诉讼参与者的程序地位。法院在刑事诉讼中的法律地位是由于公共利益或个人利益与刑事案件的结果无关,这不仅预先决定了诉讼的对抗性形式,而且保证了司法当局在行使司法时的独立性。作者的结论是,“法院”的概念是集体的,因为一方面它是进入司法系统的国家机构,另一方面,法官是权力的承载者,根据法律规定的是非和判决来审议刑事案件。由于其内部的等级结构,司法系统具有实例化的特征。司法机关的存在预先决定了刑事诉讼的运动,是履行内部司法控制和监督职能的结构性机制,也保护了刑事诉讼参与人和其他利害关系人的权利和合法利益。从功能标准的角度考察法院的权力,即:根据案情解决刑事案件;监测初步调查机构的活动;审议关于官员的行动(不作为)和决定的投诉,在刑事案件中进行诉讼;对侵犯公民权利和自由的反应、合法性原则、在刑事诉讼过程中作出私人决定或决定而促成犯罪的既定情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信