{"title":"Obraz Polski i Polaków w przemówieniu D. Trumpa (6 lipca 2017 roku w Warszawie)","authors":"Władysława Bryła, Agnieszka Bryła-Cruz","doi":"10.7311/TID.11.2018.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7311/TID.11.2018.17","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses US president Donald Trump’s speech delivered in Warsaw on 6th July 2017. The authors signal various opinions of the media about the visit (framing), discuss the setting of the speech (place, time and listeners) and present the structure and the content of the speech. The presi- dent’s address consisted of three parts: the introduction included an elaborate emotional greeting, the main body was multifaceted and the ending was a set of wishes for Poles with a nal blessing. The speaker emphasized the close relationship of the two nations, praised Poles for their bravery during the Warsaw Uprising and enumerated a set of universal values respected in European coun- tries. He also evoked the notion of the world peace. The president employed a variety of speech genres, such as appeals, wishes, threats, promises and questions. The present authors recognize the rhetorical value of the presidential address.","PeriodicalId":221855,"journal":{"name":"tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116583860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kreacje Obcego w dyskursie współczesnych polskich nacjonalistów","authors":"Bernadetta Ciesek","doi":"10.7311/TID.11.2018.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7311/TID.11.2018.16","url":null,"abstract":"Category of The Other and its instances are an obligatory element of the world’s visions constructed by social actors within many various discourses present in Polish modern social space. Discursive communities shape an attitude towards The Other that is compatible with worldview line of discourse to which they belong. The Other can be therefore perceived as The Second, coexisting beside The Yours. It can also be presented as The Stranger or even as The Enemy. This rule is valid in the nationalistic discourse where the strangeness is contrasted with hominess and it becomes one of the strategies of building the identity. It is also a strategy that places everything what is different not only beyond the discursive community’s boundaries but also beyond the national community.","PeriodicalId":221855,"journal":{"name":"tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128530226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kritik, Kritisieren vs. Rezensieren aus der Perspektive eines Sprachwissenschaftlers","authors":"Maria Krauz","doi":"10.7311/TID.11.2018.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7311/TID.11.2018.04","url":null,"abstract":"By analysing the meaning and the use of terms criticism and review criticizing and reviewing theauthor discusses similarities and di erences between the notions mentioned in the title. Starting with the sense of the verb to criticize the emphasis is placed on the di erence between lite- rary criticism and criticizing as the negatively assessing speech act. Taking into account linguistic means used in critical texts, the author discusses types of review and their constitutive features, and de nes reviewing as linguistic activity. An attempt is also made at answering the question whether considering the critic and criticisms to be dead is not premature.","PeriodicalId":221855,"journal":{"name":"tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126118347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}