Facta Philosophica最新文献_第2页

Must the Radical Skeptic Be Intellectually Akratic 激进的怀疑论者必须是智力上的Akratic吗

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI: 10.3726/93522_207

Brian Ribeiro

引用次数: 1

Determinismus und Rationalität 决定论和理性

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI: 10.3726/93522_193

J. Rosenthal

引用次数: 0

Das Lügnerparadoxon und die Restriktion des W-Schemas 我这就是你一贯的风格

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI: 10.3726/93522_103

Adolf Rami

引用次数: 0

Auf der Suche nach dem verlorenen ≫Selbst≪ — Thomas Metzinger und die ≫letzte Kränkung≪ der Menschheit 寻找那个无助的自己≫≪及社会Thomas Metzinger≫最后元≪人类

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI: 10.3726/93522_161

W. Lenzen

引用次数: 1

Indexicals and Perspectivals

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.3726/93519_3

A. Bezuidenhout

引用次数: 7

Should Pride of Place be Given to the Norms? Intentionality and Normativity 规范是否应该得到重视?意向性和规范性

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.3726/93519_85

C. Calabi, A. Voltolini

{"title":"Should Pride of Place be Given to the Norms? Intentionality and Normativity","authors":"C. Calabi, A. Voltolini","doi":"10.3726/93519_85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3726/93519_85","url":null,"abstract":"Reasons motivate our intentions and thus our actions, justify our beliefs, ground our hopes and connect our feelings of shame and pride to our thoughts. Given that intentions, beliefs and emotions are intentional states, intentionality is strongly connected with normativity. Yet what is more precisely their relationship? Some philosophers, notably Brandom and McDowell, contend at places that intentionality is intrinsically normative. In this paper, we discuss Brandom and McDowell’s thesis and the arguments they provide for its defence. In contrast to what they hold, we argue that neither reference intentionality nor content intentionality are intrinsically normative, although at least content intentionality has normative implications. More precisely, we argue that neither species of intentionality are normative from a semantical viewpoint, because being in an intentional state is not being in a state that is semantically correct or incorrect. Nevertheless, being in a state endowed with content may be a reason for believing or acting. Thus, we argue that content intentionality has normative implications. More precisely, we argue that any content is such that, if it is the content of a state that is sensitive to reasons—as judging paradigmatically is—then it entitles the subject of that state to have further states or to act in certain ways.","PeriodicalId":220934,"journal":{"name":"Facta Philosophica","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123262171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Searles verpatzte Lösung des Freiheitsproblems 塞尔对自由问题的拙劣解决方案

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.3726/93519_35

W. Lenzen

引用次数: 2

Petitio Principii: What's Wrong? 原则请求：怎么了？

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.3726/93519_19

Andrea Iacona, D. Marconi

引用次数: 6

Managing Underdetermination Issues in Science 管理科学中的决策不足问题

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.3726/93519_99

R. Hudson