Facta Philosophica最新文献_第10页

Alles nur Illusionen? - Philosophische (In-)Konsequenzen der Neurobiologie 谎言?哲学思想和神经生物学的结果

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3726/93520_189

W. Lenzen

引用次数: 2

'Encouragement in Darwin'? 达尔文的鼓励"？

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/factaphil2002425

Patrick Rysiew

引用次数: 3

Anticipation of a Final Reckoning: American Philosophy at the End of the Twentieth Century 最终清算的预期：二十世纪末的美国哲学

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/factaphil20024112

J. Margolis

引用次数: 0

How to Be a Contextualist 如何成为语境主义者

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3726/93520_261

C. Bianchi

{"title":"How to Be a Contextualist","authors":"C. Bianchi","doi":"10.3726/93520_261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3726/93520_261","url":null,"abstract":"According to Keith DeRose, epistemological contextualism is the position that “the truth-conditions of knowledge ascribing and knowledge denying sentences (sentences of the form “S knows that p” and “S doesn’t know that p”...) vary in certain ways according to the context in which they are uttered. What so varies is the epistemic standards that S must meet... in order for such a statement to be true”.1 According to the contextualist, a sentence of the form “S knows that p” does not express a complete proposition. Different utterances of the sentence, in different contexts of utterance, can express different propositions: “know” is context-dependent. Little attention has been paid to a precise formulation of the semantic contextualist thesis grounding epistemological contextualism. Many scholars refer to some kind of “hidden-indexical” theory of knowledge sentences, or claim that “know” is itself indexical. My goal is then to assess differences and similarities between “know” and context-sensitive terms in natural language—in particular pure indexicals, on the one hand, and demonstratives, on the other hand. This paper is structured as follows. In section 2, I briefly present a standard version of epistemological contextualism. In section 3, I sketch the contextualist response to scepticism. In section 4, I present the general semantic thesis grounding epistemological contextualism. In section 5 and 6, I examine and criticise a strategy in terms of pure indexicals. In section 7 and 8, I examine and criticise a strategy in terms of demonstratives. In the conclusion, I argue that only an accurate analysis of the different varieties of context sensitivity secures us a better understanding and a clearer evaluation of the contextualist approach, and of its response to the sceptic.","PeriodicalId":220934,"journal":{"name":"Facta Philosophica","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115682010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Much Ado About Nothing: Co-Referential Names and Belief Reports 无事生非：同义名称与信仰报告

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/factaphil2004624

S. Predelli

引用次数: 0

Die Negation der Klassischen Aussagenlogik als Wahrheitsfunktion 使之成为真相

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3726/93528_125

W. Loh

引用次数: 0

How Minds Understand Their World: Remarks on John McDowell’s Naturalism, Kantianism, and Pragmatism 思想如何理解他们的世界：评约翰-麦克道尔的自然主义、康德主义和实用主义

Facta Philosophica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/factaphil19991112

S. Pihlström