New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition最新文献_第2页

Chapter 7 Exploring the Organization of University–Industry Joint Laboratories: A Leadership Perspective 第七章探讨校企联合实验室的组织:领导视角

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181007

Maral Mahdad, M. Bogers, A. Piccaluga, A. D. Minin

{"title":"Chapter 7 Exploring the Organization of University–Industry Joint Laboratories: A Leadership Perspective","authors":"Maral Mahdad, M. Bogers, A. Piccaluga, A. D. Minin","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000University–industry collaborations are an important driver of innovation that highlights the benefits of collaborative processes across organizational boundaries. However, like in most collaborative processes, many challenges remain when trying to manage the process of knowledge sharing and interaction in university–industry partnerships. In this chapter, the authors specifically investigate how leadership as a managerial dimension facilitates collaboration within university–industry joint laboratories. The authors present an explorative and inductive case study of eight joint laboratories set up by Telecom Italia within five major Italian universities. The results show that the laboratory directors play a crucial role in providing a dynamic and socially active working environment, which is enabled through a process of sensemaking and sensegiving. The authors, moreover, find that this process plays a crucial role by shaping effective communication channels that facilitate knowledge sharing and transfer of information. The authors find that this process ultimately acts as a mediator between charismatic leadership on the individual level and distributed leadership on the collective level.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127442874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Chapter 5 Cognitive Processes of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification: Toward A Holistic Understanding of the Micro-Mechanisms 第五章创业机会识别的认知过程:对微观机制的整体理解

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181005

Zorica Zagorac-Uremović, C. Marxt

{"title":"Chapter 5 Cognitive Processes of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification: Toward A Holistic Understanding of the Micro-Mechanisms","authors":"Zorica Zagorac-Uremović, C. Marxt","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000Entrepreneurial opportunity (EO) identification pertains to the core processes of entrepreneurship and innovation. The initial phase of this process starts with individual cognition, which is why cognition has been established as a critical theoretical perspective. \u0000 \u0000Knowledge and new information have been confirmed as essential cognitive impact factors. However, it is not understood well, how individuals apply those factors and how they actually identify innovative and economically viable EOs. To address the limitations of current research, this chapter investigates the current literature on underlying cognitive processes of opportunity identification. \u0000 \u0000The literature analysis demonstrates that there is not a single cognitive process but rather a magnitude of different micro-mechanisms that are necessary for the successful identification of EOs. The findings are grouped to four categories of cognitive processes and entail their micro-mechanisms: pattern recognition, information processing, and creative thinking. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that those micro-mechanisms have seldom been related to each other within the scope of opportunity identification. This chapter closes this gap by discussing and contrasting and the different process categories and respective micro-mechanisms and suggests an integrative theory development and avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129768961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Chapter 8 The Moral Dilemma of Caring Versus Ruling: An Examination of the Ethical Turn in Practices 第八章关怀与统治的道德困境:对实践中的伦理转向的考察

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181008

G. Krogh, Nina Geilinger, L. Rechsteiner

引用次数: 3

Chapter 6 The Role of Power Asymmetry and Paradoxical Leadership in Software Development Team Agility 第6章权力不对称和悖论式领导在软件开发团队敏捷性中的作用

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181006

Constantinos S. Mammassis, P. Schmid

{"title":"Chapter 6 The Role of Power Asymmetry and Paradoxical Leadership in Software Development Team Agility","authors":"Constantinos S. Mammassis, P. Schmid","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000To facilitate innovative software development, more and more software development teams (SDTs) turn to agile methods. Such agile methods develop both extensive and efficient software responses to a client’s requirement change. However, the antecedents of successful agile software development are poorly understood. The authors goal is to propose a model of how power asymmetry and paradoxical leadership interact and affect agility in SDTs, which in turn affect their capacity to innovate. By leveraging insights from research on individuals’ cognition, the authors argue that developers with relatively higher power evaluate their contributions to their teams more ambivalently, which increases their delay or postponement of their contributions to their teams’ tasks. As a result, power asymmetry is negatively related to software teams’ response extensiveness and efficiency. Second, and drawing on leadership studies on behavioral complexity, the authors consider the moderating role of paradoxical leadership that a team receives as an important moderating factor to this effect. The authors argue that, when team leaders exhibit paradoxical leadership behaviors, high-power individuals’ ambivalence is less likely to emerge; hence, transforming power asymmetry to an asset for the enhancement of agility in the SDT.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130647244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Chapter 2 The Performative Power of Words: How Business Model Innovators use Framing for Strategic Advantage 第二章文字的执行力:商业模式创新者如何使用框架来获得战略优势

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181002

Yuliya Snihur, Llewellyn D. W. Thomas, Robert A. Burgelman

引用次数: 4